Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
December 30, 2020
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend Varex Imaging Corporation's 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Mountain Time. The meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via a live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the meeting, submit your questions and vote online during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VREX21. The Secretary's formal notice of the meeting and the Proxy Statement appear on the following pages and describe the matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting.
We hope that you can join us. However, whether or not you plan to attend, please vote your shares as soon as possible so that your vote will be counted.
Sincerely, | ||
![]() |
||
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD Chairman of the Board |
Varex Imaging Corporation
1678 S. Pioneer Road
Salt Lake City, Utah 84104
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
AND PROXY STATEMENT
Varex Imaging Corporation will hold its annual meeting of stockholders on Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Mountain Time. The meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via a live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the meeting, submit your questions and vote online during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VREX21.
This annual meeting is being held for the following purposes:
The Board of Directors has selected December 18, 2020 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting. A list of stockholders as of that date will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our principal executive offices at 1678 S. Pioneer Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 for 10 days before the annual meeting. If you would like to view the list, please contact us to schedule an appointment by calling (801) 978-5447 and leave a message. In addition, the list will be available for inspection by stockholders on the virtual meeting website during the meeting.
Except for those stockholders that have already requested printed copies of our proxy materials, we are furnishing our proxy materials for this annual meeting to you through the Internet. On or about December 30, 2020, we mailed or emailed to stockholders as of the record date a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice"). If you received a Notice by mail or email, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you specifically request one. Instead, the Notice explains how to access and review on the Internet all of the important information contained in our Proxy Statement and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2020, as well as how to submit your proxy over the Internet. We believe that mailing or emailing the Notice and posting other materials on the Internet allows us to provide you with the information you need more quickly while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the annual meeting. If you received the Notice and would still like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you may request a printed copy of the proxy materials through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com; by telephone at 1-800-579-1639; or by sending an email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible in accordance with the instructions provided to you to ensure that your vote is counted at the annual meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
![]() |
||
Kimberley E. Honeysett Corporate Secretary |
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, but does not contain all of the information you should consider before voting. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully.
Varex Imaging Corporation ("we," "us," "Varex," or the "Company"), a Delaware corporation formed in 2016, is a leading innovator, designer and manufacturer of X-ray imaging components, including X-ray tubes, digital detectors and other image processing solutions that are key components of X-ray imaging systems. Prior to January 28, 2017, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("Varian").
Annual Meeting of Stockholders | Meeting Agenda | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Date: | Thursday, February 11, 2021 | • Election of two directors to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
||
Time: |
2:00 p.m. Mountain Time |
• Advisory vote on executive compensation |
||
Place: |
The 2021 Annual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VREX21 and following the instructions found in the notice. |
• Ratification of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021 |
||
Record Date: |
December 18, 2020 |
• Transact any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting |
||
Voting: |
Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. |
Voting Matters and Vote Recommendation
Voting Matter | Board vote recommendation | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Election of directors | For each director nominee | ||
2. |
Advisory vote to approve executive compensation |
For |
||
3. |
Ratification of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021 |
For |
1
See Proposal One "Election of Directors" for more information.
The following table provides summary information about the director nominees and our other Board members.
Nominees for Election for a One-Year Term Ending with the 2022 Annual Meeting
Name
|
Age | Director since |
Occupation | Other public boards |
AC | CC | NC | Independent | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Timothy E. Guertin |
71 | 2020 | Former CEO of Varian Medical Systems | 1 | — | M | M | ü | |||||||||||
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. |
66 | 2018 | President and CEO, STERIS plc | 1 | — | C | M | ü |
Directors Continuing in Office until 2022 Annual Meeting
Name
|
Age | Director since |
Occupation | Other public boards |
AC | CC | NC | Independent | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jocelyn D. Chertoff, M.D. |
65 | 2017 | Chair of Radiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center | — | M | — | C | ü | |||||||||||
Jay K. Kunkel |
61 | 2017 | Former President Asia, Executive Vice President, Tenneco Inc. | — | M | M | — | ü | |||||||||||
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD (CB) |
74 | 2017 | Managing Director, Intertec Group | — | M | M | — | ü | |||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
56 | 2017 | President and CEO, Varex | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Christine A. Tsingos (FE) |
62 | 2017 | Former Executive Vice President and CFO, Bio-Rad Laboratories | 2 | C | M | ü |
The director nominees are all current directors, and all members of the Board of Directors (the "Board") attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all fiscal year 2020 meetings of the Board and each committee on which he or she served. All the directors then serving on the Board were present at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except for Mr. Kunkel who was unable to attend due to COVID-19 related travel restrictions.
2
Executive Compensation Advisory Vote
See Proposal Two "Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation" for more information.
Our Board recommends that stockholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as described in this Proxy Statement.
Approval of Auditors for Fiscal Year 2021
See Proposal Three "Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" for more information.
Our Board recommends that our stockholders ratify the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. Below is summary information about PwC's fees for services provided for fiscal years 2020 and 2019.
Fiscal Year
|
2020 | 2019 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit fees |
$ | 7,736,876 | $ | 5,600,308 | |||
Audit related fees |
$ | — | $ | — | |||
Tax fees |
$ | — | $ | — | |||
All Other fees |
$ | 900 | $ | 900 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 7,737,776 | $ | 5,601,208 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholder proposals submitted for inclusion in our 2022 proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no later than September 3, 2021.
Notice of stockholder proposals to be raised from the floor of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders outside of SEC Rule 14a-8 must be delivered to us no earlier than October 14, 2021 and no later than November 13, 2021.
3
Proposal Two is an advisory vote on the compensation of the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table (the "Named Executive Officers" or "NEOs") as described in this Proxy Statement.
Proposal Three is the ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021.
As permitted by SEC rules, we will deliver one Annual Report or Proxy Statement to multiple stockholders sharing the same address unless we have received contrary instructions. We will, upon written or oral request, deliver a separate copy of our Annual Report or Proxy Statement to a
4
stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of our Annual Report or Proxy Statement was delivered and will include instructions as to how the stockholder can notify the Company that the stockholder wishes to receive a separate copy of our Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future. Stockholders wishing to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future or stockholders sharing an address wishing to receive a single copy of our Annual Report or Proxy Statement in the future may contact us at investors@vareximaging.com or at:
Varex
Imaging Corporation
Attention: Investor Relations
1678 South Pioneer Road
Salt Lake City, Utah 84104
(801) 972-5000
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares and your shares are said to be held in "street name." Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described under "How do I vote and how do I revoke my proxy?" below.
5
Voting by proxy will not affect your right to vote your shares if you attend the Annual Meeting and want to vote in person—by voting in person you automatically revoke your proxy. You also may revoke your proxy at any time before the applicable voting deadline (11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 10, 2021) by giving our Secretary written notice of your revocation, by submitting a later-dated proxy card or by voting again using the telephone or Internet (your latest telephone or Internet proxy is the one that will be counted).
If you vote by proxy, the individuals named as proxyholders will vote your shares as you instruct. If you vote your shares over the telephone, you must select a voting option—"For," "Withhold Authority," or "Abstain" (for Proposal One) and "For," "Against," or "Abstain" (for Proposals Two and Three)—for your proxy to be counted on that matter. If you validly vote your shares over the Internet or by mail but do not provide voting instructions on all or any voting proposal, the individuals named as proxyholders will vote your shares FOR the director nominees, FOR Proposal Two, and FOR Proposal Three. In that case, the proxyholders will have full discretion and authority to vote in the election of directors.
If your shares are registered in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, or other nominee. In most instances, you can do this over the telephone or Internet, or if you have received or request a hard copy of the Proxy Statement and accompanying voting instruction form, you may mark, sign, date and mail your voting instruction form in the envelope your broker, bank, or other nominee provides. The materials that were sent to you have specific instructions for how to submit your vote and the deadline for doing so. If you hold shares in street name and would like to revoke your proxy, you must follow the broker, bank, or other nominee's instructions on how to do so. If you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the broker, bank, or other nominee holding your shares.
Broker Non-Votes—If your broker holds your shares in its name and does not receive voting instructions from you, your broker has discretion to vote these shares on certain "routine" matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm. However, on non-routine matters such as the election of directors and the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, your broker must receive voting instructions from you, as your broker does not have discretionary voting power for those particular items. So long as the broker has
6
discretion to vote on at least one proposal, these "broker non-votes" are counted toward establishing a quorum. When voted on "routine" matters, broker non-votes are counted toward determining the outcome of that "routine" matter.
For Proposals Two and Three, an affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required.
7
information about that beneficial ownership, all as detailed in our Bylaws. The notice must also describe any material interest the stockholder or beneficial owner has in the business and arrangements between such stockholder or beneficial owner and any other person in connection with the proposal and must include certain representations, all as detailed in our Bylaws.
We do not currently expect any matters other than those listed in this Proxy Statement to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is presented, your proxy gives the individuals named as proxyholders the authority to vote your shares to the extent authorized by Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
8
for director by notifying our Corporate Secretary in writing (at our Salt Lake City, Utah headquarters) as detailed in the question and answer above.
9
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
BOARD
RECOMMENDATION
VOTE "FOR" THE NOMINEES
Our Board; Selection of Nominees
In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, commencing with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, we began to declassify our board as follows: (i) the class of directors elected at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders was elected for a two-year term; (ii) the class of directors standing for election at the Annual Meeting will stand for election for a one-year term; and (iii) commencing with our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, and at each annual meeting thereafter, all directors will stand for election for a one-year term.
Timothy E. Guertin and Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. have terms expiring at the Annual Meeting and are standing for election for a one-year term. Jocelyn D. Chertoff, M.D., Jay K. Kunkel, Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD, Sunny S. Sanyal, and Christine A. Tsingos have terms expiring at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.
As discussed above, the current terms of Messrs. Guertin and Rosebrough will expire at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Guertin and Rosebrough have each been recommended by the Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders to a one-year term ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting.
Our Nominating Committee is charged with identifying, evaluating, and recommending director nominees to the full Board. There are no minimum qualifications for directors. The Nominating Committee generally seeks individuals who have or provide:
We believe that all of our directors should be committed to enhancing stockholder value, represent the interests of all stockholders, and have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience. Their service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform and carry out all director duties in a responsible manner. The Board believes that directors who are full-time employees of other companies should not serve on more than three public company boards at one time, and that directors who are retired from full-time employment should not serve on more than four public company boards. Further, while we do not have a formal diversity policy, our Board and Nominating Committee are committed to actively seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which new candidates are selected.
10
When seeking new director candidates, the Nominating Committee will consider potential candidates for directors submitted by Board members, members of our management and our stockholders. The Nominating Committee does not evaluate candidates differently based upon the source of the nominee.
The individuals named as proxyholders will vote your proxy for the election of the nominee directors unless you direct them to withhold your vote. If one or both nominees become unable to serve as a director before the Annual Meeting (or decides not to serve), the individuals named as proxyholders may vote for a substitute.
Set forth below are the names and ages of the nominees and the other continuing directors, the years they became directors, their principal occupations or employment for at least the past five years, and the names of other public companies for which they serve as a director or have served as a director during the past five years. Also set forth are the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that led our Nominating Committee to conclude that each person should serve as a director. All our directors have held high-level positions in their fields and have experience in dealing with complex issues. We believe that each is an individual of high character and integrity and exercises sound judgment.
Nominees for Election for a One-Year Term Ending with the 2022 Annual Meeting:
Timothy E. Guertin Age: 71 Director Since: 2020 Independent |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • Positions at Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
• Chief Executive Officer (2006 - 2012)
• President (2005 - 2012)
• Chief Operating Officer (2004 - 2006)
• Corporate Executive Vice President (2002 - 2005)
• President, Oncology Systems (1992 - 2005) • Other Current Public Company Board Memberships: Teradyne, Inc., a supplier of automatic test equipment. Prior Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years: Varian Medical Systems, Inc. |
|
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Deep knowledge of Varex's management structure, strategy, and users of Varex's technology, which he gained over more than 30 years with the former parent company of Varex; • Broad experience in product development, regulatory, marketing, financial and operational matters • Past service on the board of directors of Acelity L.P., Inc., a privately held global advanced wound care company • Has served on the board of healthcare and technology industry organizations and is a former director and chairman of the board of directors of TechAmerica (a nationwide technology trade association) • Service on the board of trustees and as treasurer of the Radiation Oncology Institute, a non-profit organization engaged in cancer treatment research |
11
|
Committee Memberships • Compensation and Management Development Committee • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
|
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • President and Chief Executive Officer, STERIS plc, a provider of infection prevention and other procedural products and services (2007 - Present) • Prior to joining STERIS, served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastal Hydraulics, Inc.; also served in various executive positions, including Chief Executive Officer, at Hill-Rom, a global leader in patient support systems, therapeutic products, and workflow information technology • Other Current Public Company Board Memberships: STERIS plc. |
|
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Service as a director and chief executive officer of a public company; • Over 30 years in the healthcare industry in various senior executive roles, including 25 years as chief executive officer; • Leadership experience in many major business functions, including product development, business development, manufacturing, finance, and marketing; • Experience leading ventures ranging in scale from start-up operations to multi-billion dollar multinational businesses; and • Service on the following healthcare industry boards: AAMI (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation), AdvaMed (Advanced Medical Technology Association), and MDMA (Medical Device Manufacturers Association). |
|
|
Committee Memberships • Compensation and Management Development Committee (Chair) • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
|
Continuing Directors |
||
Jocelyn D. Chertoff, M.D. |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • Positions at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
• Chair of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Vice President of the Regional Radiology Service Line (2015 - Present)
• Interim Chair of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (2014 - 2015)
• Vice Chair (2004 - 2012) • Practicing Radiologist since 1991 |
12
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Deep knowledge and experience in radiology; • Provides significant end-user perspective to assist with product development as well as with relationships with existing and prospective X-ray imaging system manufacturers; and • Experience serving on a number of non-profit boards and committees |
|
|
Committee Memberships • Audit Committee • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) |
|
Jay K. Kunkel |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • President Asia, Executive Vice President, Tenneco Inc., one of the world's largest manufacturers of ride performance and clean air products and systems for automotive and commercial vehicles (November 2018 - November 2020) • President Asia Pacific, Member of the Executive Counsel, and Company Officer, Lear Corporation, a global leader in automotive and e-systems (2013 - May 2018) • Positions at Continental AG, an automotive manufacturing company
• President Asia, Member of the Management Board (2007 - 2013)
• President Asia, Automotive Systems Division, Member of the Management Board (2005 - 2007) • Positions at PwC Financial Advisory Services
• Head of Corporate Finance and M&A Advisory
• Managing Director and Regional Leader of Automotive & Manufacturing Practice • Prior to joining PwC, held various positions at Visteon Automotive Systems, Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, and Chrysler Corporation |
|
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Extensive experience in manufacturing operations and the industrial market; • International experience, including in key markets in Asia; • Deep knowledge and core skills in corporate development and mergers and acquisitions; and • Expertise in project management and restructuring operations. |
|
|
Committee Memberships • Audit Committee • Compensation and Management Development Committee |
13
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • Owner and Managing Director, Intertec Group, an investment company specializing in the medical technology field (1989 - present) • Chairman of the Board of Directors, Cardiac Science Corporation, a provider of cardiology products (2006 - 2010) • Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Cardiac Science Corporation (2005 - 2006) • Chairman of Quinton Cardiology Systems, a predecessor to Cardiac Science Corporation (2000 - 2005) • Prior Public Company Board Memberships in Past Five Years: Encision Inc., Iridex Corporation and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. |
|
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Experience working in the medical device business for nearly four decades; • Experience working in senior business and finance executive roles with a leading electronics company for a decade; • Extensive experience with finance and mergers and acquisitions; • International experience, having lived and worked in Europe and Latin America, and gained fluency in four languages; and • Service as Chief Executive Director, Chairman or director, and a member of the audit, nominating and compensation committees, of a number of public medical device companies. |
|
|
Committee Memberships • Audit Committee • Compensation and Management Development Committee |
|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
Principal occupation and business experience • President and Chief Executive Officer (January 2017 - Present) • Senior Vice President and President, Imaging Components, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (2014 - 2017) • Chief Executive Officer, T-System Inc., an information technology solutions and services provider (2010 - 2014) • Positions at McKesson Corporation, a healthcare services and information technology company
• Chief Operating Officer, McKesson Provider Technologies (2006 - 2010)
• Group President, Clinical Information Systems division (2004 - 2006) • Previous management positions with GE Healthcare, Accenture, and IDX Systems Corporation |
14
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Extensive experience in medical device and healthcare industry; • Key insight into Varex through his leadership position within Varian's Imaging Components business before becoming our President and Chief Executive Officer; and • Significant public company operational experience. |
|
Christine A. Tsingos |
Principal occupation, business experience and directorships • Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., a leader in life science research and clinical diagnostics markets (2002 - 2019) • Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and consultant, Attest Systems, Inc., a leading software company in the IT asset management sector • Chief Financial Officer, Tavolo, Inc., a leading online retailer of specialty food, cookware, and cooking-related content • Vice President and Treasurer, Autodesk, Inc., a leading developer of design software • Assistant Treasurer, The Cooper Companies, Inc., a global healthcare manufacturer of vision-related products • Other Current Public Company Board Memberships: Onto Innovation Inc., a manufacturer of semiconductor equipment and Envista Holdings Corporation, a global dental products company |
|
|
Experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills supporting directorship • Expertise in finance, operations, and financial reporting matters; • Extensive experience and critical insights in financial management, strategic planning, acquisitions, treasury, and investor relations; • Over 25 years of public company experience and a proven track record, including being named Bay Area CFO of the Year in 2010 and among the Most Influential Women in Business 2008 - 2012; and • Service as chair of the audit committee and member of the compensation committee of a public manufacturing company. |
|
|
Committee Memberships • Audit Committee (Chair) • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
15
Director Qualifications Matrix
The following matrix is provided to illustrate the skills and qualifications of the nominated and continuing members of our Board and demonstrate our commitment to inclusiveness and diversity.
Overview
We are committed to strong corporate governance. Our governance policies and practices include:
Ethical Conduct and Strong Governance
16
Director Independence
Majority Voting
Board Structure
17
Annual Meeting will stand for election for a one-year term; and (iii) commencing with our 2022 annual meeting, and at each annual meeting thereafter, all directors will stand for election for a one-year term.
Director and Executive Compensation
Director Independence
The Board has determined that Dr. Chertoff, Mr. Guertin, Mr. Kunkel, Dr. Naumann-Etienne, Mr. Rosebrough, and Ms. Tsingos are "independent" for purposes of the Nasdaq listing requirements and under our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Sanyal, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is an employee and therefore not "independent." The Board considered transactions and relationships (such as Ms. Tsingos' service on the board of Envista Holdings Corporation, a customer of the Company), both direct and indirect, between each director (and his or her immediate family) and the Company and its subsidiaries and affirmatively determined that none of Dr. Chertoff, Mr. Kunkel, Dr. Naumann-Etienne, Dr. Reinhardt, Mr. Rosebrough, and Ms. Tsingos has any material relationship, either direct or indirect, with us other than as a director and stockholder.
Board Meetings
The Board met eight times in fiscal year 2020. Each of the Board meetings included executive sessions of either the independent directors or the non-management directors, or both, with Dr. Naumann-Etienne presiding at such meetings. We have three standing committees of the Board: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating Committee. Each current
18
director attended at least 75% of the total Board meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served that were held in fiscal year 2020. Directors are encouraged to attend meetings of committees on which they do not serve as members. All directors of the Company are strongly encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All the directors then serving on the Board were present at our 2020 Annual Meeting, except for Mr. Kunkel who was unable to attend due to COVID-19 related travel restrictions.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines designed to promote the functioning of the Board and its committees. These Guidelines and our Bylaws address Board composition, Board functions and responsibilities, qualifications, leadership structure, committees, and meetings.
Our Bylaws require that the Chairman of the Board be chosen from among the directors and may not be the Chief Executive Officer. The Board has determined that having Dr. Naumann-Etienne, who is "independent" within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards, serve as Chairman and Mr. Sanyal serve as Chief Executive Officer is in the best interests of the stockholders. We have separated the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting our strategic direction and for our day-to-day leadership and performance, while the Chairman provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and leads the Board. The Board believes its administration of its risk oversight function has not affected the Board's leadership structure.
The Board's Role in Risk Oversight
Our Company faces a number of risks, including operational, economic, financial, legal, regulatory, and competitive risks. Our management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face. While our Board, as a whole, has ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management, it administers its risk oversight role in part through the Board committee structure, with the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating Committee responsible for monitoring and reporting on the material risks associated with their respective subject matter areas. In fiscal year 2019, we updated the charter of the Audit Committee to reference its oversight responsibility with respect to cybersecurity.
The Board's role in our risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management, as well as external advisors such as PwC, on areas of material risk to us, including operational, economic, financial, legal, regulatory and competitive risks. The full Board (or the appropriate committee in the case of risks that are reviewed by a particular committee) receives these reports from those responsible for the relevant risk in order to enable it to understand our risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. When a committee receives the report, the Chairman of the relevant committee generally provides a summary to the full Board at the next Board meeting. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role. The Audit Committee assists the Board in oversight and monitoring of principal risk exposures related to financial statements, legal, ethical compliance, regulatory, and other matters, as well as related mitigation efforts. The Compensation Committee assesses, at least annually, the risks associated with our compensation policies. The Nominating Committee assists the Board in oversight of risks that we have relative to compliance with corporate governance standards.
Board Committees and Committee Meetings
Each of our standing committees has a written charter approved by the Board that clearly establishes the committee's roles and responsibilities. Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance
19
Guidelines and Code of Conduct, can be found through the "Corporate Governance" link on the Investors page on our website at www.vareximaging.com. Please note that information on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of these proxy soliciting materials, is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and, except for information filed by the Company under the cover of Schedule 14A, is not deemed to be proxy soliciting materials.
Audit Committee
Chair: Ms. Tsingos
Additional Members: Dr. Chertoff, Mr. Kunkel, and
Dr. Naumann-Etienne
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2020: 9
Committee Functions:
Member Qualifications
Each member of the Audit Committee meets the additional requirements regarding independence for Audit Committee members under Nasdaq listing requirements. The Board has determined that Ms. Tsingos is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act based upon her experience as the chief financial officer of Bio-Rad Laboratories between 2002 and 2019 and as the chief financial officer of Attest Systems, Inc. between 2000 and 2002.
Compensation and Management Development Committee
Chair: Mr. Rosebrough
Additional Members: Mr. Guertin, Mr. Kunkel, and
Dr. Naumann-Etienne
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2020: 5
Committee Functions:
20
The Compensation Committee determines all compensation for our NEOs and certain other of the Company's officers. Before making decisions on compensation for individuals other than our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews with our Chief Executive Officer each individual's performance and accomplishments over the prior year. Except for his own position, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee about base salary increases, any changes to the incentive plan target awards and the amount of equity awards for each executive. However, the Compensation Committee retains and does not delegate any of its exclusive power to determine all matters of executive compensation and benefits for the designated officers. The Compensation Committee meets with its independent advisors and other independent members of the Board to determine the Chief Executive Officer's compensation.
Compensation Committee Advisors
To independently assist and advise the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FW Cook") as its compensation consultant since May 2018. The engagement with FW Cook is exclusively with the Compensation Committee, which has sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant or other advisor that it uses. FW Cook does not have any relationship with the Company or management except as it may relate to performing services on behalf of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FW Cook pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent the company from independently representing the Compensation Committee.
The compensation consultant reviews and analyzes our executive compensation programs, compensation strategy and effectiveness of pay delivery. The compensation consultant provides market information on compensation trends and practices and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee based on competitive data. The compensation consultant advises the Compensation Committee chair on agenda items for Compensation Committee meetings, reviews management proposals and is available to perform special projects at the Compensation Committee chair's request. The compensation consultant also periodically provides the Compensation Committee with updates on regulatory and legislative developments pertaining to executive compensation and compensation committee governance. The compensation consultant provides analyses and recommendations that inform the Compensation Committee's decisions, but does not decide or approve any compensation actions. As needed, the Compensation Committee also consults with the compensation consultant on program design changes.
Member Qualifications
In addition to being independent, each member of the Compensation Committee is a "non-employee director" for purposes of the Exchange Act.
21
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Chair: Dr. Chertoff
Additional Members: Mr. Guertin, Mr. Rosebrough, and
Ms. Tsingos
Meetings in Fiscal Year 2020: 4
Committee Functions:
22
PROPOSAL TWO
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Background to the Advisory Vote
Under Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are able to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis (an "Advisory Vote on Compensation"), the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the related executive compensation tables. Accordingly, we are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the following advisory resolution at our Annual Meeting:
"RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in the Annual Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Tables, and the other related tables and disclosure, is hereby APPROVED."
The Board recommends a vote FOR this resolution because it believes that the policies and practices described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement are effective in achieving the Company's goals of attracting, retaining and motivating our executives, rewarding individual and Company performance and aligning the executives' long-term interests with those of the Company's stockholders.
We encourage stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 29 of this Proxy Statement, as well as the related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the Company's compensation policies and practices and the compensation of our NEOs.
This "say-on-pay" vote is a non-binding advisory vote. The approval or disapproval of this proposal by stockholders will not require the Board or the Compensation Committee to take any action regarding our executive compensation practices. Nonetheless, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.
Approval of the resolution above (on a non-binding, advisory basis) requires that the number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, in favor of the resolution exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the resolution.
Next "Say-On-Pay" Advisory Vote
We currently conduct an annual Advisory Vote on Compensation and the Board expects to hold the next Advisory Vote on Compensation at the 2022 Annual Meeting.
23
PROPOSAL THREE
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
Selection of the Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our financial statements for fiscal year 2021, and we are asking you and other stockholders to ratify this appointment.
The Audit Committee, which is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm, annually reviews the independent registered public accounting firm's independence, including reviewing all relationships between the independent registered public accounting firm and us and any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and the independent registered public accounting firm's performance. Additionally, the Audit Committee also noted that our PwC engagement audit partner is subject to regular rotation and the most recent rotation occurred in fiscal year 2018. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Board, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, has determined to submit to stockholders for ratification, the appointment of PwC. In the event that a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on Proposal Three does not ratify this appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee will review its future appointment of PwC.
We expect that a representative of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting and that such representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally requested annually and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service, which must be classified in one of the four categories of services. The Audit Committee may also, on a case-by-case basis, pre-approve services that are not contained in the annual pre-approval request. In connection with this pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee also considers whether the categories of pre-approved services are consistent with the rules on accountant independence promulgated by the SEC.
24
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following is a summary of the fees billed or to be billed to us by PwC for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019.
Fee Category
|
Fiscal Year 2020 |
Fiscal Year 2019 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees(1) |
$ | 7,736,876 | (3) | $ | 5,600,308 | ||
Audit-Related Fees |
$ | — | $ | — | |||
Tax Fees |
$ | — | $ | — | |||
All Other Fees(2) |
$ | 900 | $ | 900 | |||
| | | | | | | |
Total Fees |
$ | 7,737,776 | $ | 5,601,208 |
The Audit Committee determined that PwC's provision of these services, and the fees that we paid for these services, are compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee pre-approved all services that PwC provided in fiscal year 2020 and 2019 in accordance with the pre-approval policy discussed above.
Ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 1, 2021 requires an affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted "FOR" ratification of the appointment of PwC.
25
The Audit Committee of the Board (the "Audit Committee") consists of the four directors whose names appear below. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the definition of "independent director" and otherwise qualifies to be a member of the Audit Committee under Nasdaq listing requirements.
The Audit Committee's general role is to assist the Board in monitoring the Company's financial reporting process and related matters. Its specific responsibilities are set forth in its charter. The Audit Committee reviews its charter at least annually, and did so in the August 2020 Audit Committee meeting.
As required by the charter, the Audit Committee reviewed the Company's financial statements for fiscal year 2020 and met with management, as well as with representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, to discuss the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with members of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and letters required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with members of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from management and the Company.
Based on these discussions, the financial statement review and other matters it deemed relevant, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company's audited financial statements for fiscal year 2020 be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2020.
Furthermore, in connection with the standards for independence promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Audit Committee reviewed the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the fees the Company paid for these services, and whether the provision of the services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee deemed that the provision of the services is compatible with maintaining that independence.
The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. In doing so, the Audit Committee considered the results from its review of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's independence, including (a) all relationships between PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the Company and any disclosed relationships or services that may impact their objectivity and independence, (b) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's performance and qualification as an independent registered public accounting firm and (c) the fact that the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP engagement audit partner is rotated on a regular basis as required by applicable laws and regulations. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Audit Committee has determined to submit its appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the stockholders for ratification. In the event that a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter does not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will review its future appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Christine A. Tsingos (Chair) Jocelyn D. Chertoff Jay K. Kunkel Ruediger Naumann-Etienne |
26
Beneficial Ownership of Certain Stockholders, Directors and Executive Officers
This table shows as of December 4, 2020: (1) the beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock and the number of shares they beneficially owned based on information provided in their most recent filings with the SEC; and (2) the number of shares each director, each nominee for director and each NEO and all directors, nominees for director and executive officers as a group beneficially owned, as reported by each person. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each is 1678 S. Pioneer Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except as noted, each person has sole voting and investment power over the shares shown in this table. For each individual and group included in the table below, the percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by the person or group, which includes the number of shares of common stock that the person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after December 4, 2020 by the sum of the 39,171,602 shares of common stock outstanding on December 4, 2020, plus the number of shares of common stock that the person or group had the right to acquire on or within 60 days after December 4, 2020.
|
Amount and Nature of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
|||
Stockholders |
|||||
Blackrock, Inc.(1) |
5,976,111 | 15.3% | |||
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055 |
|||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2) |
4,089,701 | 10.4% | |||
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 |
|||||
Shapiro Capital Management LLC(3) |
3,942,943 | 10.0% | |||
3060 Peachtree Road, Suite 1555 N.W., Atlanta, GA 30305 |
|||||
Directors, Nominees for Director and Named Executive Officers |
|||||
Jocelyn D. Chertoff, M.D.(4) |
14,097 | * | |||
Brian W. Giambattista(5) |
53,657 | * | |||
Timothy E. Guertin |
— | * | |||
Kimberley E. Honeysett(6) |
86,224 | * | |||
Mark S. Jonaitis(7) |
163,864 | * | |||
Jay K. Kunkel(8) |
14,558 | * | |||
Shubham Maheshwari |
— | * | |||
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD(9) |
35,846 | * | |||
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr.(10) |
22,701 | * | |||
Sunny S. Sanyal(11) |
903,444 | 2.3% | |||
Christine A. Tsingos(12) |
14,558 | * | |||
Clarence R. Verhoef(13) |
272,979 | * | |||
All directors, nominees for director and executive officers as a group (12 persons) |
1,581,928 | 4.0% |
27
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain officers, and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of our common stock and any changes in their ownership to the SEC. The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports and we must identify in this Proxy Statement those persons who did not file these reports when due. Based solely on our review of copies of the reports filed with the SEC and the written representations of our directors and executive officers, except as set forth in the following sentence, we believe that each person who at any time during the 2020 fiscal year was a director or an executive officer or held more than 10% of our common stock filed the required reports on time in fiscal year 2020. The Form 4s covering two transactions for each of Sunny Sanyal, Kimberley Honeysett, Mark Jonaitis, Brian Giambattista, and one transaction for Kevin Yankton that were due on February 18, 2020, were not filed until February 28, 2020.
28
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Prior to January 28, 2017, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("Varian"). On January 28, 2017, Varian completed its spin-off of the Company (the "Spin-off") and we became an independent publicly traded company. Our executives have been compensated under the Varex executive compensation program since fiscal year 2018. The discussion in this section provides an overview of, and describes details regarding, the compensation programs for our NEOs and Board in fiscal year 2020. It includes a discussion of our business highlights, our philosophy, programs, governance, along with actual and target compensation received.
In establishing the executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee continued to review and revise our executive compensation program to better align its targeted results with the Company's business strategy and objectives as a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. For 2020, the Compensation Committee approved:
The Compensation Committee believes this program incentivizes the NEOs to manage the business and take actions that will increase the market valuation of the Company over the long term.
In fiscal year 2020, the ongoing impact of COVID-19 created significant challenges for our business and operations. During this extraordinary year, we focused on improving items in our control to better position Varex for growth once the economy recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cost Reduction Actions
We targeted $28 million of annualized cost reductions which are expected to be fully realized starting in the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. Approximately 75% of the cost reductions are expected to benefit gross margin and about 25% to benefit operating expenses.
New Capital Structure
During the second half of fiscal 2020, we put in place a more flexible debt structure that also helped increase our liquidity.
29
offering primarily to pay off our prior credit facility. The remaining net proceeds from the notes offering were added to our cash balance and are expected to be used for general corporate purposes.
China
China appears to have recovered from the initial shutdown due to COVID-19. In fiscal year 2020, the China market represented 11% of our total company revenues. Our local Chinese OEM customers have continued to successfully bring new CT systems to market. Strong sales of CT systems by local Chinese manufacturers led to a significant increase in the number of CT tubes that we shipped to China in fiscal year 2020 over the prior fiscal year.
New Products
Our R&D teams have been actively engaged with our customers during fiscal year 2020 with new product development efforts.
Financial Results
Our financial results for fiscal year 2020 included:
30
impacted across all the vertical markets we serve, including applications for cargo screening at ports and borders, baggage screening at airports, and non-destructive testing and inspection.
2020 Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
At our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 92.3% of the votes cast in the "say-on-pay" advisory vote were "FOR" approval of our proposal. We value this positive endorsement by our stockholders of our 2019 executive compensation policies and believe that the outcome signals our stockholders' support of our compensation program. Consequently, based on these say-on-pay results, we continued our general approach to compensation for fiscal year 2020, including our pay for performance philosophy and our efforts to attract, retain, and motivate our named executive officers.
Philosophy of Our Executive Compensation Programs
The Compensation Committee believes that attracting, motivating, and retaining a team of high-performing executives with strong industry expertise is critical to advancing the interests of stockholders. To promote these objectives, the Compensation Committee is guided by the following principles in developing our executive compensation program and in making pay decisions:
The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs should include short-term and long-term components, including cash and equity-based compensation, and should reward performance as measured against established goals and in terms of share price appreciation. The Compensation Committee evaluates both performance and compensation to make sure that the compensation provided to executives remains competitive relative to compensation paid by companies of similar size operating in our industry, taking into account our relative performance and our own strategic goals. Our Compensation Committee considers the total current and potential long-term compensation of each of our executive officers in establishing each element of compensation, but views each element as related but distinct.
31
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section focuses on the following executives who were our NEOs for fiscal year 2020:
Name
|
Title | |
---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Shubham Maheshwari | Chief Financial Officer | |
Brian W. Giambattista | Senior Vice President and General Manager, Detectors | |
Kimberley E. Honeysett | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | |
Mark S. Jonaitis | Senior Vice President and General Manager, X-Ray Sources | |
Clarence R. Verhoef | Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Each program component and the rationale for it are highlighted below:
Component
|
Purpose and Role | |
---|---|---|
Base salary |
• Provide a competitive, fixed level of cash compensation to attract and retain talented and skilled senior executives. |
|
|
• Recognize sustained performance, capabilities, job scope, experience, and internal pay equity. |
|
Annual cash incentives |
• Motivate and reward achievement of annual financial results that drive stockholder value. |
|
|
• Reward achievement of strategic goals that provide the foundation for future growth and profitability. |
|
Performance-based stock options |
• Align executives with stockholders on gains in equity value (exercise price is set 10% higher than our closing stock price on the date of grant). |
|
|
• Encourage retention and long-term thinking through time-based vesting over four years. |
|
Restricted stock units |
• Align executives with stockholders through use of equity. |
|
|
• Encourage executive retention and long-term thinking through time-based vesting over four years. |
|
Executive benefits and perquisites |
• Provide the same 401(k) and other benefits as non-executive employees. |
|
|
• Provide a competitive retirement benefit by allowing executives to defer compensation pursuant to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. |
Our executive compensation programs are heavily weighted towards variable compensation that provides a direct link between corporate performance, stock price and pay outcomes for our executives. Our programs also tie pay outcomes to the achievement of key strategic objectives that we believe will drive longer-term value to stockholders. The Compensation Committee regularly assesses our programs to ensure they are aligned with the Company's evolving business strategy and are effective in supporting the Company's talent needs.
32
with our stockholders in the form of annual cash incentives and LTIs. For our other NEOs as a group, 68% of their target TDC was at-risk.
33
contributions of each executive. Because 85% of our Chief Executive Officer's target TDC is tied to the achievement of operating results and share price performance, it is valuable to assess the pay that is realized compared to the pay opportunity. Our NEOs' TDC for fiscal year 2020, which includes short-term incentives and the intrinsic value of LTIs granted in fiscal year 2020 as of the end of fiscal year 2020, was significantly lower than their fiscal year 2020 target TDC, which demonstrates alignment with stockholders as illustrated below:
|
Fiscal Year 2020 TDC(1) | |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Difference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salary Paid |
|
Actual Annual Incentive |
|
Option Value |
|
RSU Value |
|
|
FY 2020 Target TDC(2) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
+ |
+ |
+ |
= |
Total | = |
($) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 584,817 | $ | 230,885 | $ | 0 | $ | 747,717 | $ | 1,563,419 | $ | 4,312,177 | $ | (2,748,758 | ) | (64 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari(3) |
$ | 88,461 | $ | 26,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 749,993 | $ | 864,455 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 334,200 | $ | 63,032 | $ | 0 | $ | 127,028 | $ | 524,260 | $ | 1,033,956 | $ | (509,696 | ) | (49 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 331,338 | $ | 88,647 | $ | 0 | $ | 125,828 | $ | 545,813 | $ | 1,025,239 | $ | (479,426 | ) | (47 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 319,070 | $ | 100,047 | $ | 0 | $ | 120,979 | $ | 540,096 | $ | 985,675 | $ | (445,579 | ) | (45 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef(4) |
$ | 406,950 | $ | 74,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 480,950 | $ | 1,438,105 | $ | (957,155 | ) | (67 | )% |
Key Changes for Fiscal Year 2021 Compensation and Governance Programs
For fiscal year 2021, our short-term incentive plan will only utilize one corporate financial measure: Earnings before Interest and Taxes ("EBIT"). The plan will also incorporate two distinct six-month measurement periods for the financial metric as opposed to a full year measure. This allows the setting of appropriate thresholds at the beginning of fiscal year 2021 and then to establish new thresholds in May 2021 that will apply for the second six-month period of the fiscal year. The change is being done in recognition of the enhanced economic uncertainties as of November 2020 when the Plan was approved, related to the global COVD-19 global pandemic. Our LTI program for fiscal year 2021 will remain substantially the same as the program for fiscal year 2020.
34
Executive Compensation Practices Highlights
A number of practices strengthen the alignment of our executive compensation program with the interests of our stockholders:
What we do | What we do not do | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
✓ | Independent Compensation Committee | × | Routinely target pay above market median | |||
✓ | Independent compensation advisor | × | Provide tax gross ups or tax reimbursements | |||
✓ | NEOs employed "at will" | × | NEO employment contracts | |||
✓ | Robust CEO & NEO stock ownership guidelines | × | Permit directors and NEOs to engage in common stock margining, pledging, or hedging | |||
✓ | Clawback policy that applies to our annual cash incentive plan and equity incentive plan | × | Provide excessive NEO perquisites | |||
✓ | Require NEOs to sell Company stock in the public market through a 10b5-1 trading plan | × | Reprice and repurchase options | |||
✓ | Annual compensation review and risk assessment | × | Egregious pension/supplemental NEO retirement plan payouts | |||
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ |
Annual stockholder "Say-on-Pay" vote Award over 50% of LTI value in performance-based option awards Place caps on maximum payouts from our annual cash incentive plan Annual review of succession plan |
× × × |
Provide for a liberal change in control definition in individual contracts or equity plans which could result in payments to NEOs without an actual change in control occurring Change in control severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties Excessive severance/change in control provisions that provide cash payments exceeding two and a half times base salary plus target/average/most recent bonus |
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Role of the Compensation and Management Development Committee.
The Compensation Committee oversees the development and administration of our executive compensation programs, including the underlying philosophy and related policies. The Compensation Committee's responsibilities include:
Role of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee as requested on incentive plan design, financial and strategic performance goals, performance and compensation for other executives, and management transitions and succession.
35
The Chief Executive Officer does not make recommendations regarding his own compensation or Board compensation.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee retained FW Cook, a nationally-recognized independent compensation consulting firm, to advise on certain compensation matters. FW Cook does not provide other services to the Company or the Company's management.
FW Cook advised the Compensation Committee with respect to fiscal year 2020 compensation trends and best practices, competitive pay levels, equity grant practices and competitive levels, peer group data, incentive plan design, and relevant Proxy Statement disclosure.
The Compensation Committee has determined that FW Cook is independent, and the services provided by FW Cook during fiscal year 2020 did not raise any conflict of interests. In reaching these conclusions, the Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act and applicable listing standards.
Setting Executive Compensation. Generally, in determining base salary, target annual incentives and guidelines for long-term equity awards, the Compensation Committee considers several factors including, but not limited to the executive's:
Peer Group and Market Analysis. The Compensation Committee uses a compensation peer group to monitor the compensation practices of our primary competitors for executive talent. The Compensation Committee reviews executive pay relative to the median pay of comparable positions in peer group companies and, as appropriate, compensation survey data. The Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant reviews the companies in the peer group annually and proposes changes in response to mergers and acquisitions, significant movements in revenues or market capitalization, and revised business strategies. For the peer group developed during fiscal year 2019 and used for fiscal year 2020 pay decisions, the Compensation Committee approved the removal of one peer from the prior year peer group (Integra) and the addition of one peer (marked with an asterisk in the table below). The peer group companies compete in the healthcare equipment and supplies, life sciences tools and services, and electronic equipment instruments and components industries that the Compensation Committee believes reflect the competitive market for executive talent similar to that required by the Company.
Angio Dynamics, Inc. | Merit Medical Systems, Inc. | |
Coherent | MTS Systems Corporation | |
CONMED Corporation | Natus Medical Incorporated | |
CyroLife* | Novanta | |
CTS Corporation | NuVasive | |
Integer Holding | Orthofix Medical Inc. | |
KEMET Corporation | OSI Systems, Inc. | |
Luminex Corporation | Rogers Corporation | |
Wright Medical |
36
At the time the peer group was selected, Varex had annual revenue (based on the most recent four quarters) and market capitalization (as of April 22, 2019) near the median of the peer group. Further detail on the peer group is as follows:
|
|
Peer Group | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company Scope
|
Varex | 25P | Median | 75P | |||||||||
Revenue ($M) |
783 | 475 | 836 | 1,102 | |||||||||
Market Capitalization at time of selection ($M) |
1,209 | 989 | 1,555 | 2,944 |
Fiscal Year 2020 Compensation Program and Pay Decisions
Base Salaries. The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries of our NEOs annually but primarily adjusts salaries in recognition of significant increases in position responsibilities, demonstrated capabilities, and sustained individual performance. Gaps in internal pay equity or external pay competitiveness are also considered. For fiscal year 2020, the NEOs received base salary increases ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% from their fiscal year 2019 base salaries, which salaries were effective as of December 14, 2019. Fiscal year 2020 base salaries were as follows:
Name
|
Fiscal Year 2020 Base Salary(1) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 637,360 | ||
Shubham Maheshwari(2) |
$ | 460,000 | ||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 349,513 | ||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 347,802 | ||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 333,211 | ||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
$ | 393,592 |
Annual Cash Incentives. Our NEOs receive annual incentives through our Management Incentive Plan ("MIP"), which rewards our executive officers for the achievement of predetermined annual financial and strategic goals. On November 21, 2019, the Compensation Committee set the fiscal year 2020 performance goals under the MIP for the NEOs and certain other executive officers. For fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee established a pool of funds equal to 4.0% of our fiscal year 2020 EBIT results (the "MIP Bonus Pool") to be available for annual cash incentives under the MIP to the executive officers. The Compensation Committee retained negative discretion to pay each of these executive officers less than their corresponding maximum share of the MIP Bonus Pool based on the financial performance measures, team and individual strategic goals summarized below. The corresponding maximum share of the MIP Bonus Pool was the lesser of two times the target participation level of each executive officer under the MIP or a specified percentage of the MIP Bonus Pool, which is defined in the table below for each NEO.
The Compensation Committee sets individual incentive opportunities, expressed as a percentage of each individual's salary, prior to the commencement of the fiscal year corresponding with each individual's position and responsibilities with the Company and competitive pay practices. The target incentive opportunities are reviewed by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its
37
independent compensation consultant. There were no changes to the target incentive opportunity percentages for fiscal year 2020.
|
|
MIP Target | MIP Maximum (lesser of the following) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Base Salary | % of Base Salary |
Amount | % of Base Salary |
As a % of MIP Bonus Pool |
|||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 637,360 | 100 | % | $ | 637,360 | 200 | % | 39 | % | ||||||
Shubham Maheshwari(1) |
$ | 460,000 | 65 | % | $ | 299,000 | — | — | ||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 349,513 | 50 | % | $ | 174,756 | 100 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 347,802 | 50 | % | $ | 173,901 | 100 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 333,211 | 50 | % | $ | 166,605 | 100 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
$ | 393,592 | 60 | % | $ | 236,155 | 120 | % | 14.5 | % |
75% of the MIP opportunity is based on financial measures and 25% is based on individual strategic goal. Both portions have potential funding of between 0% and 200% of target. For fiscal year 2020, for corporate executives (Messrs. Sanyal, Maheshwari, Verhoef and Ms. Honeysett), the 75% financial portion is determined by metrics based on overall company performance (revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow), and for solution and business line executives (Messrs. Giambattista and Jonaitis), the 75% financial portion is determined 50% by metrics based on overall company performance and 50% by metrics related to each executive's solution or business line. The individual strategic portion is determined based on achievement of pre-established individual goals. The mechanics for calculating the fiscal year 2020 MIP awards was as follows:
Fiscal Year 2020 MIP Framework
Financial Portion—On November 21, 2019, the Compensation Committee set the fiscal year 2020 financial performance goals under the MIP for the NEOs and other officers reporting directly to our CEO, as well as for our Chief Accounting Officer. For fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee selected revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow as the equally-weighted financial performance measures applicable to overall Company performance because it believes that these measures drive our stock market value. As noted above, Messrs. Giambattista and Jonaitis also had metrics related to their solution or business line. For these metrics, the Compensation Committee selected solution or business line revenue and contribution margin (gross margin less research and development costs) because it believes these are the best measures of financial success at the solution or business line level. Each of
38
these metrics is subject to adjustment provisions adopted by the Compensation Committee at the time the MIP goals were set.
The payout percentages for the financial metrics were determined in accordance with the tables below. Results between indicated levels in the table are interpolated on a straight-line basis.
Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Goals Attainment
Measure ($M)
|
Min 30% |
Target 100% |
Maximum 200% |
Result | Attainment | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue |
$725.0 | $805.0 | $845.0 | $736.3 | 39.9% | |||||
% of Target |
90% | 100% | 105% | 91% | ||||||
EBITDA $ |
$87.0 |
$109.0 |
$125.0 |
$50.0 |
0.0% |
|||||
% of Target |
80% | 100% | 115% | 46% | ||||||
Free Cash Flow |
$37.0 |
$46.0 |
$53.0 |
$13.0 |
0.0% |
|||||
% of Target |
80% | 100% | 115% | 28% | ||||||
|
Total Company Financial Attainment: 13.3% |
Fiscal Year 2020 Solution Line Financial Goals Attainment
Segment / Solution Line Financial Objectives
|
Revenue ($M) | Contribution Margin ($M) | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Min (30% Payout) |
Target (100% Payout) |
Max (200% Payout) |
FY 20 Result |
Goal Attainment |
FY19 Actual |
Min (30% Payout) |
Target (100% Payout) |
Max (200% Payout) |
FY 20 Result |
Goal Attainment |
BU Financial Attainment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Giambattista |
* | * | * | * | 0.0 | % | * | * | * | * | * | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Jonaitis |
* | * | * | * | 117.5 | % | * | * | * | * | * | 87.6 | % | 99.5 | % |
Fiscal Year 2020 Payouts—
The Compensation Committee evaluated the performance of Mr. Sanyal, considering the applicable financial and individual achievements, and determined his award in its sole discretion. Mr. Sanyal's individual goals related to the successful consolidation of the Company's Santa Clara facility, product development, and the completion of important customer contract renewals. The Committee met in executive session for this evaluation and then reviewed their recommendation for Mr. Sanyal with the full Board.
Mr. Sanyal submitted recommendations for each of the other NEOs based on the achievement of the respective corporate and solution line financial goals for fiscal year 2020, in relation to the thresholds set by the Compensation Committee, in addition to the scoring of the individual portions of the MIP. MIP payouts were not adjusted to account for the significant difficulties that COVID-19 presented for the business.
Mr. Maheshwari received a prorated award in accordance with the terms of his offer letter. Mr. Giambattista's individual goals related to developing production capabilities and prototype
39
development. Ms. Honeysett's individual goals related to improving operational efficiency by developing a crisis communications strategy and streamlining the contract approval process. Mr. Jonaitis' individual goals related to reducing the overall bill of material (BOM) cost for certain groups of products, while also improving international operations. Mr. Verhoef's individual goals related to supply chain cost improvements and reducing the run rate of general and administrative costs and manufacturing overhead. In addition to the original assessment of individual goal attainment, Mr. Sanyal recommended an additional discretionary adjustment to 125% of the individual target for Mr. Giambattista. This adjustment was recommended due to the successful completion and accelerated closing of the Santa Clara facility, in addition to other achievements, not fully reflected in the original assessment.
Final determination of awards was made by the Compensation Committee, with payouts as calculated in the following table:
|
FY20 MIP Weightings (% Total Opportunity) |
FY20 MIP Funding (Unweighted % of Target) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Financial | Qualitative | Financial | Qualitative | Base Sal |
FY20 Target Incentive |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FY20 MIP Payout | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a) Corporate |
(b) Solution Line |
(c) Scorecard × Individ.Mult. |
(d) Corporate |
(e) Solution Line |
(f) indiv. Scorecard |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
($000) | ($000) | (% Sal.) | % Target | ($000) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
75.0 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 105.0 | % | $ | 637 | $ | 637 | 100 | % | 36.2 | % | $ | 231 | ||||||||||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari |
75.0 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 460 | $ | 299 | 65 | % | 35.0 | % | $ | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
37.5 | % | 37.5 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 0.0 | % | 125.0 | % | $ | 350 | $ | 175 | 50 | % | 36.2 | % | $ | 63 | ||||||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
75.0 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 164.0 | % | $ | 348 | $ | 174 | 50 | % | 51.0 | % | $ | 89 | ||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
37.5 | % | 37.5 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 99.5 | % | 71.0 | % | $ | 333 | $ | 167 | 50 | % | 60.1 | % | $ | 100 | ||||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
75.0 | % | 25.0 | % | 13.3 | % | 86.0 | % | $ | 394 | $ | 236 | 60 | % | 31.5 | % | $ | 74 |
Note: Mr. Maheshwari was hired in July 2020 and his incentive payment was pro-rated.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. An important objective of our compensation program is aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. To accomplish this objective, we tie a significant portion of the total compensation of executive officers to our long-term stock performance through the grant of equity awards. We believe that equity compensation helps motivate executive officers to drive long-term profitable growth because they will be rewarded with increased equity value and also assists in the retention of executive officers who may have significant value in unvested equity awards.
2019 was the last year in our three-year post spin-off LTI program. Beginning in fiscal year 2020, we transitioned to an LTI strategy with annual equity grant values established near median market levels. On a year over year basis, the fiscal year 2020 LTI was higher than fiscal year 2019 grant levels due to the fiscal year 2017-19 LTI program that frontloaded the grants resulting in a higher-than-average fiscal year 2017 and relatively lower values fiscal year 2018 and 2019. The fiscal year 2020 LTI is composed of 50% RSUs and 50% performance-based stock options. Multiple alternative performance designs were considered, and the Compensation Committee decided to replace time-based stock options with performance-based (premium priced) stock options, with the strike price set 10% above the Company's stock price on the applicable grant date. We believe the performance-based stock options, together with RSUs provide a strong balance incentivizing financial performance and growth, while also supporting executive retention.
Annual guideline LTI values were established as a dollar value, as opposed to a percent of salary in fiscal year 2020. However, the LTI values amounted to the same percentages of salary as those used for purpose of the fiscal year 2017-2019 LTI program.
40
The performance-based stock options granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2020 have up to ten-year terms and vest over four years, with 25% of the stocks options vesting one year after grant and the remainder vesting in equal monthly increments over the following 36-month period.
The RSUs granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2020 vest over four years, with 50% vesting on the second anniversary and the remaining 50% vesting on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.
Vesting of the stock options and RSU awards will occur only if the NEO is employed by the Company or an affiliate through each vesting date, except in cases involving death, disability, or termination without cause or good reason in connection with a change of control. Additionally, such awards will accelerate in the event of certain corporate transactions if such awards are not assumed or continued.
The fiscal year 2020 LTI awards are summarized in the table below. The grants were made under the Company's 2020 Stock Plan. The grant date fair value of each award was determined using the Black-Scholes model for stock options and was based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant for RSUs. Additional information about equity awards granted in fiscal year 2020 is provided below in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.
|
Fiscal Year 2020 LTI Grant Value | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Stock Options |
+ |
RSUs | = |
Total | |||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 1,544,998 | $ | 1,545,000 | $ | 3,089,998 | ||||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari(1) |
$ | 749,999 | $ | 749,993 | $ | 1,499,999 | ||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 262,498 | $ | 262,476 | $ | 524,974 | ||||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 259,991 | $ | 259,996 | $ | 519,987 | ||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 249,992 | $ | 249,977 | $ | 499,969 | ||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef(2) |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
Other Elements of Executive Compensation. Because our philosophy is to emphasize pay for performance, we provide retirement, group benefits and perquisites of relatively minor value to our executives.
Deferred Compensation Plan. NEOs and other highly compensated U.S. employees may make voluntary contributions to the Varex Imaging Corporation 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the "DCP"). The Company currently does not contribute into the DCP.
Group Benefits and Other Perquisites. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the same employee benefit plans and on the same basis as all other Company employees, such benefit plans include group medical, dental, vision, long-term disability, life insurance and 401(k). During 2020, as a cost saving measure due to the economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 global pandemic, the Company matching contribution to the 401(k) was suspended. We expect to reinstate a matching contribution commencing in January of 2021. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer can be reimbursed for financial counseling expenses of up to $10,000 and other NEOs up to $7,500. In addition, all NEOs are eligible to receive reimbursement of up to $4,000 for an executive physical.
41
The Company does not provide executives tax gross-ups or reimbursements for any taxable income from these benefits and perquisites.
Change in Control Agreements. We currently have change-in-control agreements with all our NEOs. We entered into these agreements to attract and retain high-quality executives and to ensure that executives who might be involved in acquisition or merger discussions with another entity make the best decisions for us and our stockholders and are not unduly biased by the impact of such a transaction on their personal situations. These agreements do not factor into our decisions surrounding the executive's cash and equity compensation.
Each change-in-control agreement contains a "better after-tax" provision, which provides that if any of the payments to the executive constitutes a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code, the payments will either be (i) reduced or (ii) provided in full to the executive, whichever results in the executive receiving the greater amount after taking into consideration the payment of all taxes, including the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. The agreements do not include tax gross up payments for excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.
The change-in-control agreements are intended to provide an appropriate level of compensation for a specified time interval for executives who would likely be involved in activities regarding a change in control and are personally at risk for job loss in the event of a change in control. Our change-in-control agreements are "double-trigger" meaning that to receive benefits under the agreements there must be a change-in-control event and the executive must either:
For more information about the agreements as well as a tabular summary of the potential payments that may be made to our NEOs, please refer to "—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
Executive Compensation Governance Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines. As noted above, a core element of our compensation philosophy is to align the interests of executive officers with those of stockholders by providing appropriate long-term incentives. To further this goal, the Company maintains stock ownership guidelines based on the value of our common stock owned as a multiple of base salary. The guidelines are reviewed annually and revised upward as appropriate to keep pace with competitive and good governance practices. The multiples are set based upon each officer's position, as set forth below:
Position
|
Stock Ownership Multiple of Salary |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
CEO |
6x | |||
CFO |
3x | |||
Other corporate officers |
1x |
The program counts owned shares and unvested RSUs towards the guideline. Ownership levels are expected to be achieved within the later of: (i) five years of first becoming an officer, (ii) three years of an amendment increasing ownership levels with respect to any increase, or (iii) three years of the date that the new ownership levels apply to such individual due to a change in position or becoming a NEO. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, except as described in the following sentence, all the NEOs meet the guidelines or are on track to meet the guidelines in the relevant timeframe. While Mr. Sanyal was on track to meet the Company's stock ownership guidelines as the end of fiscal year 2019, because
42
of the drop in our stock price during fiscal year 2020, the value of his stock holdings have decreased significantly and Mr. Sanyal may not meet the stock ownership guidelines within five years of becoming an officer. Mr. Sanyal did not sell any Company stock during fiscal year 2020. Throughout fiscal year 2021, the Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the NEOs stock ownership.
Recoupment (or "Clawback") Policy. The Board has adopted a formal policy to recover certain incentive payments if we are required to restate our financial statements as a result of an executive officer engaging in misconduct or other violations of our Code of Conduct that caused or partially caused the restatement. In the event of a restatement, the Board will review the conduct of the executive officer in relation to the restatement. If the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in misconduct or other violations of our Code of Conduct, the Board can, in its discretion, take appropriate action, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, to remedy the misconduct, including, without limitation, seeking reimbursement of any portion of performance-based or incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive that is greater than would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results. Such action by the Board would be in addition to any other actions the Board or we may take under our other policies, as modified from time to time, or any actions imposed by law enforcement, regulators or other authorities.
This recoupment policy is incorporated into the provisions of our MIP, 2017 Stock Plan, and 2020 Stock Plan. Under our current stock option agreement and restricted stock unit agreement, if an employee commences employment with a company that competes with us in any of our businesses, we may, in our sole discretion, terminate the applicable agreement, including the vesting of any options or other grants which remain unvested as of the date the employee commences employment with the competitor and may seek a recoupment of options or shares that have vested within the previous three years.
Prohibition on Hedging or Pledging Company Securities and Insider Trading Policy. The Board has approved a corporate insider trading policy to prohibit executive officers and directors from purchasing Company securities on margin, holding Company securities in a margin account, borrowing against any account in which Company securities are held or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. For all other employees subject to the quarterly blackout period under the insider trading policy, which includes business unit general managers, and other employees who have access to, or assist in compiling, company financial data, purchases on margin and the pledging of or borrowing against Company securities are not strictly prohibited, but such activities are strongly discouraged and advance consultation with the Company's Legal Department is required. The insider trading policy also prohibits officers, directors, and other employees subject to the quarterly blackout period from engaging in transactions in puts, calls or other derivatives on an exchange or in any other organized market and other hedging transactions. In addition, our NEOs are required to sell Company stock through a 10b5-1 trading plan.
Equity Grant Practices. The Compensation Committee has typically approved grants of equity awards to selected newly-hired individuals on the date of the first regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Compensation Committee following their date of hire. Special grants to continuing employees, such as for promotions or retention purposes, are typically approved on the date of the first regularly scheduled quarterly Compensation Committee meeting following the recommendation to make a special grant.
In fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee provided a pool of available shares and delegated authority to the CEO to make off-cycle grants for new hires, promotions, or other retention situations. Such grants may only be made to individuals who are not Section 16 Insiders and not direct reports of the CEO. Equity grants to the CEO, direct reports of the CEO and other Section 16 insiders continue to be the approved by the Compensation Committee either at one of the Compensation Committee's regularly scheduled meetings or through unanimous written consent.
43
The date of grant of an equity award is the date of approval by the Compensation Committee. However, if on any date of grant our trading "blackout" is in effect or if our management knows of material, non-public information about the Company, any equity awards to be made will be granted effective as of the close of the business day after the "blackout" expires, or the close of the second business day after the public release of the material, non-public information, as applicable. Our standard quarterly "blackout" period begins two weeks prior to the end of each fiscal quarter (i.e. before the stock markets open on the second Monday prior to the last day of each fiscal quarter) and ends two full business days after the Company publicly releases its quarterly financial and operational results for the quarter.
The exercise price of our stock options is based on (and is not less than) the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq exchange on the date of grant. If the date of grant falls on a day upon which Nasdaq is closed, then the exercise price is based on the closing price of our common stock on the next trading date. The 2017 Stock Plan and the 2020 Stock Plan explicitly prohibit the repricing of stock options without prior stockholder approval.
Compensation Risk Management. The Compensation Committee's annual review and approval of the Company's compensation philosophy and strategy includes the review of compensation-related risk. In fiscal year 2020, the Compensation Committee's consultant reviewed the Company's compensation programs for employees and executives, including the annual cash incentive plans and long-term, equity-based incentive awards, and does not believe that such compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Compensation Committee's consultant reported that the Company's compensation programs are designed using an appropriate pay philosophy, peer group, and benchmarking to support business objectives with meaningful risk mitigation, oversight, and discretion by the Compensation Committee.
The report also determined that the Company's principal sales incentive plan is based on measurable and verifiable goals for its bonus plan for executives. In addition, total target incentive compensation for all employees is a small percentage of total sales and revenue, and incentive opportunities under these plans are capped. Management also retains discretion to reduce incentive amounts.
The Compensation Committee believes that the following risk oversight and compensation design features described in greater detail above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section safeguard against excessive risk taking:
Tax Deductibility. Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers. While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award and pay compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in
44
the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation and to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.
Compensation Committee Report.
The Compensation and Management Development Committee (the "Compensation Committee") of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Varex Imaging Corporation (the "Company") has reviewed and discussed with management the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of the Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. (Chair)
Timothy E. Guertin
Jay K. Kunkel
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne
45
The following table sets forth certain information about the compensation of the NEOs for each of the years during which such individuals were NEOs.
Name and Principal Position
|
Fiscal Year |
Salary ($)(3) |
Bonus ($)(4) |
Stock Awards(5) ($) |
Option Awards(6) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(6) ($) |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other Compensation(7) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
2020 | 584,817 | — | 1,545,000 | 1,544,998 | 230,885 | — | 28,062 | 3,933,762 | |||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief |
2019 | 620,000 | 468 | 1,052,444 | 1,052,444 | 403,000 | — | 36,765 | 3,165,121 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer |
2018 | 615,769 | — | 1,052,416 | 1,052,448 | 256,665 | — | 24,134 | 3,001,432 | |||||||||||||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari(1) |
2020 |
88,461 |
— |
749,993 |
749,999 |
26,000 |
— |
— |
1,614,453 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
2020 |
334,200 |
— |
262,476 |
262,498 |
63,032 |
— |
12,391 |
934,597 |
|||||||||||||||||||
SVP and General Manager |
2019 | 339,993 | 1,487 | 178,466 | 178,488 | 142,800 | — | 17,750 | 858,964 | |||||||||||||||||||
X- Ray Detectors |
2018 | 337,966 | — | 178,488 | 178,485 | 83,522 | 14,970 | 793,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
2020 |
331,338 |
— |
259,996 |
259,991 |
88,647 |
— |
10,631 |
950,603 |
|||||||||||||||||||
SVP, General Counsel and |
2019 | 334,425 | 462 | 175,544 | 175,564 | 126,390 | — | 20,400 | 832,785 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Secretary |
2018 | 332,433 | 208 | 163,834 | 163,864 | 77,959 | — | 20,504 | 758,802 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
2020 |
319,070 |
— |
249,977 |
249,992 |
100,047 |
— |
16,441 |
935,527 |
|||||||||||||||||||
SVP and General Manager— |
2019 | 324,135 | 196 | 170,171 | 170,163 | 93,740 | — | 19,255 | 777,660 | |||||||||||||||||||
X-Ray Sources |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef(2) |
2020 |
406,950 |
— |
— |
— |
74,000 |
— |
21,234 |
502,184 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Former SVP and Chief |
2019 | 385,875 | 198 | 270,086 | 270,106 | 139,440 | — | 26,500 | 1,092,205 | |||||||||||||||||||
Financial Officer |
2018 | 383,575 | 714 | 270,088 | 270,107 | 71,652 | — | 28,906 | 1,025,042 |
Name
|
Company Contributions to 401(k)(a) |
Other(b) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 17,062 | $ | 11,000 | |||
Shubham Maheshwari |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 10,141 | $ | 2,250 | |||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 9,631 | $ | 1,000 | |||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 8,658 | $ | 7,783 | |||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
$ | 11,234 | $ | 10,000 |
46
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020
The following table provides information on plan-based awards made in fiscal year 2020 to each of our NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
All other Stock Awards: # of Shares of RSUs(2) |
All Other Option Awards: # of Securities Underlying Options(3) |
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(4) |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grant Date |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Threshold(1) | Target(1) | Maximum(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
— | $ | 191,208 | $ | 637,360 | $ | 1,274,720 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | 60,446 | — | — | $ | 1,545,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 173,206 | $ | 28.12 | $ | 1,544,998 | |||||||||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari |
— | $ | 89,700 | $ | 231,525 | $ | 463,050 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
10/2/2020 | — | — | — | 60,630 | — | — | $ | 749,993 | ||||||||||||||||
|
10/2/2020 | — | — | — | — | 160,944 | $ | 13.61 | $ | 749,999 | |||||||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
— | $ | 52,427 | $ | 174,756 | $ | 349,512 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | 10,269 | — | — | $ | 262,476 | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 29,428 | $ | 28.12 | $ | 262,498 | |||||||||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
— | $ | 52,170 | $ | 173,901 | $ | 347,802 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | 10,172 | — | — | $ | 259,996 | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 29,147 | $ | 28.12 | $ | 259,991 | |||||||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
— | $ | 49,982 | $ | 166,605 | $ | 333,210 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | 9,780 | — | — | $ | 249,977 | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 28,026 | $ | 28.12 | $ | 249,992 | |||||||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
— | $ | 70,847 | $ | 236,155 | $ | 472,310 | — | — | — | — |
47
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards of the NEOs as of the end of fiscal year 2020:
Name
|
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)(1) |
Option Exercise Price ($)(2) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
2/21/2014 | 111,330 | (4) | — | $ | 27.77 | 2/21/2021 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/13/2015 | 70,503 | (5) | — | $ | 30.74 | 2/13/2022 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2016 | 80,280 | (6) | — | $ | 25.17 | 2/12/2023 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 12,467 | (7) | — | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 34,889 | (8) | — | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 34,254 | (8) | — | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 355,220 | (9) | 41,305 | (9) | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | 57,553 | (11) | 31,562 | (11) | $ | 37.10 | 2/15/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | 40,882 | (12) | 62,400 | (12) | $ | 31.42 | 2/15/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | 173,206 | (13) | $ | 28.12 | 2/15/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2017 | — | — | — | — | 9,363 | (15) | 115,820 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 14,184 | (17) | 175,456 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 25,122 | (18) | 310,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 60,446 | (19) | 747,717 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
797,378 | 308,473 | — | — | 109,115 | 1,349,752 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Clarence R. Verhoef |
2/21/2014 |
22,063 |
(4) |
— |
$ |
27.77 |
2/21/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2/13/2015 | 27,116 | (5) | — | $ | 30.74 | 2/13/2022 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2016 | 47,786 | (6) | — | $ | 25.17 | 2/12/2023 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 4,795 | (7) | — | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 14,537 | (8) | — | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 91,551 | (9) | 10,646 | (9) | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | 14,770 | (11) | 8,101 | (11) | $ | 37.10 | 2/15/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | 10,492 | (12) | 16,015 | (12) | $ | 31.42 | 2/15/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2017 | — | — | — | — | 2,414 | (15) | 29,861 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 3,640 | (17) | 45,027 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 6,447 | (18) | 79,749 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
233,110 | 34,762 | — | — | 12,501 | 154,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
2/12/2016 |
9,189 |
(6) |
— |
$ |
25.17 |
2/12/2023 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 49,590 | (9) | 5,767 | (9) | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | 8,960 | (11) | 4,915 | (11) | $ | 37.10 | 2/15/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | 6,819 | (12) | 10,410 | (12) | $ | 31.42 | 2/15/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | 29,147 | (13) | $ | 28.12 | 2/15/2030 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2017 | — | — | — | — | 1,307 | (15) | 16,168 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,208 | (17) | 27,313 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 4,191 | (18) | 51,843 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 10,172 | (19) | 125,828 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
74,558 | 50,239 | — | — | 17,878 | 221,152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shubham Maheshwari |
10/02/2020 |
— |
160,944 |
(14) |
$ |
13.61 |
8/15/2030 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||||||||||||
|
10/02/2020 | — | — | — | — | 60,630 | (20) | 749,993 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
— | 160,944 | — | — | 60,630 | 749,993 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mark S. Jonaitis |
2/21/2014 |
13,790 |
(4) |
— |
$ |
27.77 |
2/21/2021 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||||||||||||
|
2/13/2015 | 12,472 | (5) | — | $ | 30.74 | 2/13/2022 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2016 | 14,703 | (6) | — | $ | 25.17 | 2/12/2023 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/16/2017 | 57,677 | (9) | 6,707 | (9) | $ | 31.08 | 2/16/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | 9,305 | (11) | 5,104 | (11) | $ | 37.10 | 2/15/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | 6,610 | (12) | 10,089 | (12) | $ | 31.42 | 2/15/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | 28,026 | (13) | $ | 28.12 | 2/15/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
2/12/2017 | — | — | — | — | 1,521 | (15) | 18,815 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,293 | (17) | 28,364 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 4,062 | (18) | 50,247 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 9,780 | (19) | 120,979 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
114,557 | 49,926 | — | — | 17,656 | 218,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
48
Name
|
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)(1) |
Option Exercise Price ($)(2) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(1) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards; Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brian W. Giambattista |
5/25/2017 | 31,132 | (10) | 6,227 | (10) | $ | 34.13 | 5/15/2024 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | 9,760 | (11) | 5,353 | (11) | $ | 37.10 | 2/15/2025 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | 6,933 | (12) | 10,583 | (12) | $ | 31.42 | 2/15/2026 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | 29,428 | (13) | $ | 28.12 | 2/15/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
5/25/2017 | — | — | — | — | 863 | (16) | 10,675 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2018 | — | — | — | — | 2,406 | (17) | 29,762 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/15/2019 | — | — | — | — | 4,260 | (18) | 52,696 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2/18/2020 | — | — | — | — | 10,269 | (19) | 127,028 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
47,825 | 51,591 | 17,798 | 220,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
49
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company's common stock acquired by NEOs through stock option exercises and vesting of RSUs during fiscal year 2020. In addition, the table presents the value realized upon such exercises or vesting, as calculated, in the case of stock options, based on the difference between the market price of the Company's common stock at exercise and the option exercise price and, in the case of RSUs, based on the closing price per share of the Company's common stock on the vesting date.
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
Value Realized Upon Exercise |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting |
Value Realized on Vesting |
|||||||||
Sunny S. Sanyal |
— | — | 24,829 | $ | 286,732 | ||||||||
Shubham Maheshwari |
— | — | — | — | |||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
— | — | 3,807 | $ | 48,207 | ||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
13,530 | $ | 110,675 | 4,021 | $ | 50,693 | |||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
— | — | 3,485 | $ | 32,923 | ||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
21,047 | $ | 128,391 | 6,382 | $ | 51,987 |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table sets forth contributions, earnings and distributions during fiscal year 2020, and account balances as of October 2, 2020 for each of the NEOs under (i) our nonqualified DCP and (ii) the now frozen deferred compensation plan that they participated in at Varian prior to the Spin off:
Name
|
Plan | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year(1) |
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year(2) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year(3) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions |
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
DCP | — | — | $ | 64,198 | — | $ | 210,464 | ||||||||||
|
Frozen DCP | — | — | $ | 6,715 | $ | 116,980 | |||||||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
DCP | $ | 117,544 | — | $ | 85,757 | — | $ | 543,836 | |||||||||
|
Frozen DCP | — | — | $ | 106,829 | — | $ | 651,969 | ||||||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
DCP | $ | 24,146 | — | $ | 35,356 | — | $ | 242,697 | |||||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
Frozen DCP | — | — | $ | 247 | — | $ | 23,638 | ||||||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
DCP | $ | 11,534 | — | $ | 430 | — | $ | 11,965 | |||||||||
|
Frozen DCP | — | — | $ | 332,925 | $ | (403,638 | ) | $ | 1,110,164 |
In October 2016, the Board approved the DCP and it became effective for 2017 compensation. In addition, the DCP assumed certain deferred compensation obligations from the Varian 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan in connection with the Spin-off. The Company also maintains the Varex Imaging Corporation Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Frozen DCP"), which assumed certain pre-Spin-off deferred compensation obligations from the Varian Frozen Deferred Compensation Plan. No deferrals have been made under the Frozen DCP.
50
The DCP is designed to allow a select group of management and highly compensated employees, including its executive officers, to defer receipt of a specified percentage of their base salaries (up to 50%) and its non-employee directors to defer receipt of their director fees (up to 100%). Further, the Company may make discretionary contributions on behalf of participants in the DCP. Deferred amounts under the DCP and Frozen DCP will be unfunded, unsecured obligations subject to the claims of the Company's creditors. The payment of DCP and Frozen DCP benefits will be funded by its general assets, which may be held in a rabbi trust for this purpose.
Amounts deferred by a participant into the DCP and any employer contributions are credited to an unfunded bookkeeping account maintained on behalf of each participant. These amounts will be periodically adjusted for earnings and/or losses at a rate that is equal to the various hypothetical investment funds (also referred to as measurement funds) selected by the plan administrator and elected by the participant. Participants may reallocate previously invested money among each of the available measurement funds daily.
Under the DCP, a participant will be permitted to make separate distribution elections with respect to each year's deferrals. These distribution elections will include the ability to elect a single lump-sum payment or installment payments for up to 10 years following termination of employment. Deferrals also may be paid out prior to termination of employment in the event of a financial hardship or if the participant makes a short-term payout election, and such deferrals will be paid in the form of a lump sum. Under the DCP, amounts credited as Company contributions are paid in the form of a lump sum following a participant's separation from service.
Under the Frozen DCP, upon retirement, a participant's accounts will be paid in a single lump-sum payment or in installment payments of up to 15 years following retirement, as elected by the participant in accordance with the terms of the plan. Upon a pre-retirement termination of employment, a participant's accounts will be paid in a lump sum (or if they equal or exceed $50,000 in the aggregate, in up to five annual installments if approved by the plan committee). Deferrals under the Frozen DCP also may be paid out prior to termination of employment in the event of a financial hardship or if the participant makes a short-term payout election. Special rules also apply to distributions following a participant's death or disability.
The DCP and Frozen DCP may be terminated by action of the Board. In the case of the DCP, upon termination, benefits will be distributed as soon as the plan and Section 409A of the Code permit. In the case of the Frozen DCP, upon termination, payments will generally be made in a lump sum but may be made in annual installments of up to fifteen years for plan terminations covering all participants that occur prior to a change in control, in each case, except as would cause plan benefits to become subject to Section 409A of the Code.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Each of our NEOs have entered into a Change in Control Agreement ("CIC Agreement") that was approved by our Board. Under the CIC Agreements, if the Company terminates the NEO's employment other than by reason of death, disability, retirement or "cause", or if the NEO voluntarily terminates for "good reason", in either case, within 60 days prior to, or 18 months following, a change in control of the Company, then the NEO will be entitled to:
51
The amount of the lump sum severance payment in the case of each of the NEOs will be equal to a multiple of the sum of: (A) the NEO's base salary and (B) the greater of (x) the NEO's most recently established target annual bonus under the Company's annual cash incentive plan and (y) the average annual cash incentive that was paid to the NEO in the three fiscal years ending prior to the date of termination under the Company's annual cash incentive plan or Varian's annual cash incentive plan. The severance multiple for Mr. Sanyal is 2.5 and the severance multiple for other NEOs is 2.0. If the NEO has not completed at least three full fiscal years of service with the Company prior to the NEO's termination date, then the amount determined in (y) above will be based on the average annual cash incentive for the number of full fiscal years that the NEO has completed.
As a condition to receiving such severance benefits, an NEO must execute a release of all of his or her rights and claims relating to his or her employment and comply with certain post-termination restrictions, including, among other things, continuing to comply with the terms of his or her proprietary information and non-disclosure agreement, and for a period of 12 months, complying with certain non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that are set forth in the NEO's CIC Agreement.
In addition, if within 18 months after a change in control, the NEO incurs a separation from service by reason of the NEO's death or disability, the NEO or, if applicable, the NEO's estate will be entitled to death or long-term disability benefits from the Company no less favorable than the most favorable benefits to which the NEO would have been entitled had the death or disability occurred at any time during the period commencing one year prior to the change in control under the plans of the Company.
The CIC Agreements with the NEOs do not provide for tax gross-ups of payments subject to the "golden parachute" excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. Each CIC Agreement instead contains a "better after-tax" provision, which provides that if any of the payments to the NEO constitutes a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code, the payments will either be (i) reduced or (ii) provided in full to the NEO, whichever results in the NEO receiving the greater amount after taking into consideration the payment of all taxes, including the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code.
Under the Company's 2017 Stock Plan and 2020 Stock Plan, except as otherwise provided in the NEOs' equity agreements, in the event of certain corporate transactions, if the Compensation Committee does not provide for the assumption, continuation or substitution of stock awards, each stock award will fully vest and terminate upon the consummation of the transaction. In these instances, stock option holders will be given reasonable advance notice of the impending termination and a reasonable opportunity to exercise their outstanding vested stock options before the termination of such awards.
The NEOs' equity agreements provide that if the applicable NEO's employment terminates due to death or disability, his or her unvested stock option and RSU awards will fully vest upon such termination. Vested stock options granted in 2017-19 may be exercisable for up to three years from the date his or her employment terminates due to death and one year from the date his or her employment terminates due to disability, unless in each case the stock option term expires earlier. The 2020 stock options, once vested, remain exercisable for up to one year upon a disability and for the remainder of the option term in the instance of a retirement or death.
52
Potential Payments Table
The table below reflects the value of compensation and benefits that would become payable to each of the NEOs if (i) a change in control occurred on October 2, 2020 and the NEO experienced a qualifying termination of employment on that date, (ii) a corporate transaction occurred on October 2, 2020 and the NEO's equity awards are not assumed, continued or substituted, or (iii) the NEO died or experienced a qualifying disability on October 2, 2020. These amounts are based upon the NEO's compensation as of such date and on the Company's closing stock price of $12.37 on October 2, 2020 and do not take into account the "better after-tax" provision in the CIC Agreements.
These benefits are in addition to the benefits under then-exercisable stock options, the benefits under the DCP which the NEO would receive in the event of any termination, and the benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as distributions under the Company's broad based 401(k) plan. No additional benefits are provided to NEOs upon retirement.
The benefits payable as a result of a change in control as reported in the columns of this table are as follows:
The actual amounts that would be paid in such circumstances can be determined only at the time of any such event. Due to several factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon such an event, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the Company's stock price, the executive's current base salary, and the "better after-tax" provision in the CIC Agreements.
53
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment in Connection with a Change in Control
Name
|
Cash Severance |
Benefit Continuation |
Options(1) | RSUs(1) | Total | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 3,186,800 | $ | 25,544 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,349,753 | $ | 4,562,097 | ||||||
Shubham Maheshwari |
$ | 1,518,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 749,993 | $ | 2,267,993 | ||||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 1,048,036 | $ | 18,010 | $ | 0 | $ | 220,161 | $ | 1,286,707 | ||||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 1,043,406 | $ | 25,544 | $ | 0 | $ | 221,151 | $ | 1,290,101 | ||||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 999,630 | $ | 28,586 | $ | 0 | $ | 218,405 | $ | 1,246,621 | ||||||
Clarence R. Verhoef(2) |
— | — | — | — | — |
Potential Payments upon Death or Disability
Name
|
Options(1) | RSUs(1) | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunny S. Sanyal |
$ | 0 | $ | 1,349,753 | $ | 1,349,753 | ||||
Shubham Maheshwari |
$ | 0 | $ | 749,993 | $ | 749,993 | ||||
Brian W. Giambattista |
$ | 0 | $ | 220,161 | $ | 220,162 | ||||
Kimberley E. Honeysett |
$ | 0 | $ | 221,151 | $ | 221,151 | ||||
Mark S. Jonaitis |
$ | 0 | $ | 218,405 | $ | 218,405 | ||||
Clarence R. Verhoef |
$ | 0 | $ | 154,637 | $ | 154,637 |
This section provides information regarding our director compensation policy for non-employee directors and the amounts paid and equity awards granted to these directors in fiscal year 2020. Our non-employee director compensation policy is designed to provide the appropriate amount and form of compensation to our non-employee directors. Directors who are employees (i.e., Mr. Sanyal) receive no compensation for their services as directors.
Our business was impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic and the associated economic downturn, as described above in the Business Highlights section. The assist the Company in responding to the economic downturn, our nonemployee directors agreed to temporarily reduced their cash retainers by 30%.
Each year the Compensation Committee and the Board review the Company's director compensation program with the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant (FW Cook). As a result of this review, in 2019, the Board of Directors approved the following changes to
54
our director compensation program that applied to fiscal year 2020: meeting fees were eliminated, and committee chair retainers were increased to better align with peers.
Component
|
Description | |
---|---|---|
Annual Retainer |
• $65,000 in cash, payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears, and pro-rated for any partial year of service. For Q3 and Q4 of fiscal year 2020, the annual retainer was temporality reduced to $11,375 per quarter due to COVID-19 pay reductions |
|
Non-Executive Board Chair Retainer |
• Additional $40,000 in cash, payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears, and pro-rated for any partial year of service |
|
Committee Member Retainer |
|
|
—Audit |
• $15,000 in cash |
|
—Compensation & Management Development |
• $8,000 in cash |
|
—Nominating & Corporate Governance |
• $7,000 in cash |
|
|
Payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears, and pro-rated for any partial year of service |
|
Committee Chair Retainers |
|
|
—Audit |
• $30,000 in cash |
|
—Compensation & Management Development |
• $18,000 in cash |
|
—Nominating & Corporate Governance |
• $15,000 in cash |
|
|
Payable in equal quarterly installments in arrears, and pro-rated for any partial year of service |
|
Annual Equity |
• On or about the Company's annual meeting of stockholders, non-employee directors will receive an annual award of DSUs with a grant date fair value of $160,000, and the non-employee chair of the Board of Directors will receive an additional annual award of DSUs with a grant date fair value of $60,000. For fiscal year 2020, the annual grant was made on February 14, 2020 |
|
|
• DSUs vest 100% after the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the grant date and the next annual meeting of stockholders that occurs after the grant date, subject to the applicable director's continued service; provided however, that such DSUs will vest in full upon the earlier of (i) a termination of service due to the applicable director's death, disability, retirement or (ii) a change in control of the Company |
55
Component
|
Description | |
---|---|---|
|
• The DSUs will generally be settled for shares of the Company's common stock on the earlier of (i) the applicable director's termination of service for any reason, (ii) the third anniversary of the date of grant, (iii) a change in control of the Company or (iv) the applicable director's death |
|
Share Ownership Guidelines |
• Each non-employee director is expected to own shares valued at five times the annual Board service retainer fees |
|
|
• Shares underlying DSU awards held by the non-employee directors (whether or not vested) will be counted toward satisfaction of the guidelines |
|
|
• Ownership levels must be achieved within five years from the date upon which an individual becomes a non-employee director; all non-employee directors have met the guidelines or are on track to do so within five years of joining the Board |
Non-employee directors may elect to defer their cash retainers and/or meeting fees under our DCP, subject to the restrictions of applicable tax law. Please refer to the discussion in "—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" above for more information.
The following table sets forth the compensation received by each non-employee director during fiscal year 2020 (note that all directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with attending Board and committee meetings, and for expenses related to attending continuing directors' education programs):
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
Stock Awards(1) |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings |
All Other Compensation |
Total | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jocelyn Chertoff, M.D. |
$ | 70,250 | $ | 159,975 | — | — | $ | 230,225 | ||||||||
Timothy E. Guertin(2) |
$ | 6,667 | — | — | — | $ | 6,667 | |||||||||
Jay K. Kunkel |
$ | 78,250 | $ | 159,975 | — | — | $ | 238,225 | ||||||||
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD |
$ | 118,250 | $ | 219,992 | — | — | $ | 338,242 | ||||||||
Erich R. Reinhardt |
$ | 85,250 | $ | 159,975 | — | — | $ | 245,225 | ||||||||
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. |
$ | 80,250 | $ | 159,975 | — | — | $ | 240,225 | ||||||||
Christine A. Tsingos |
$ | 92,250 | $ | 159,975 | — | — | $ | 252,225 |
56
The following table sets forth the aggregate number of outstanding DSUs held by each non-employee director as of the end of fiscal year 2020:
Name
|
Outstanding DSUs |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jocelyn D. Chertoff, M.D |
15,570 | |||
Timothy E. Guertin |
— | |||
Jay K. Kunkel |
15,570 | |||
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, PhD |
21,410 | |||
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. |
14,861 | |||
Christine A. Tsingos |
15,570 |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during fiscal year 2020 or at any other time an officer or employee of the Company, and no member of this committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2020.
For fiscal year 2020, based on reasonable estimates, the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO) was $58,257, and the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in our Summary Compensation Table, was $3,933,762. Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of the median off all employees was 68:1.
Employees Included. October 2, 2020 was used to determine the median employee (the "determination date"). At the determination date, we had approximately 2,068 employees worldwide. In identifying the worldwide median employee, we included all our employees (except for our CEO).
Selecting Median Employee. In identifying the median employee, we used base salary (or hourly rate multiplied by 2020 work schedule for hourly employees) for fiscal year 2020 plus each employees' annual cash incentive opportunity as of the determination date (in each case annualized for regular part-time employees and full-time employees who joined during the fiscal year). No adjustments were made for cost of living or low compensation standards in any countries. Pay for non-U.S. employees was converted to U.S. dollars using currency exchange rates as of the determination date. There were two median employees identified. In accordance with SEC rules, we selected the employee with the most representative set of compensation components.
The SEC's rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the CEO pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
57
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions
The Nominating Committee is responsible for the review, approval, or ratification of "related person transactions" between the Company or its subsidiaries and related persons. Under SEC rules, a related person is a director, nominee for director, or executive officer since the beginning of the last fiscal year, or a more than five percent stockholder, and their immediate family members. Such transactions may include employment or consulting relationships with a related person or contracts under which we receive goods or services from (or provide goods and services to) a related person or a company for which the related person is an employee or otherwise affiliated. The Board has adopted written policies and procedures that apply to any transaction or series of transactions in which the Company or one of its subsidiaries is a participant and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. Generally for a transaction to be approved, the Nominating Committee must be informed or have knowledge of (i) the related person's relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction; (ii) the material facts of the proposed transaction, including a description of the nature and potential aggregate value of the proposed transaction; (iii) the benefits, if any, to the Company of the proposed transaction; (iv) if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; and (v) an assessment of whether the proposed transaction or situation is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.
The Nominating Committee has, however, determined that a related person does not have a direct or indirect material interest in the following categories of transactions:
Transactions involving related persons that are not included in one of the above categories are forwarded to our legal department to determine whether the related person could have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction, and any such transaction is forwarded to the Nominating Committee for review. The Nominating Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, terminate, or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion. There were no related party transactions during fiscal year 2020.
58
VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION 1678 S. PIONEER ROAD SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VREX21 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D28743-P48012 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. To elect two directors to serve until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Nominees: 1a. Timothy E. Guertin For Withhold Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! 1b. Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain ! ! ! 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation as described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: ! ! ! 3. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021. NOTE: The proxyholders are authorized to vote on any other business as is properly brought before the Annual Meeting for action in accordance with their judgment as to the best interests of Varex Imaging Corporation. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D28744-P48012 VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Stockholders February 11, 2021 2:00 PM Mountain Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Sunny S. Sanyal and Kimberley E. Honeysett, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 2:00 PM, MST on February 11, 2021, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held virtually and may be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VREX21. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side