Dana Incorporated
Download
SEC Document
SEC Filing

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO.  )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
DANA INCORPORATED
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
 
 
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11- all one line.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic
Dana Incorporated
Proxy Statement and Notice of
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report
are Available at www.dana.com/proxy

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic

Dana Incorporated
3939 Technology Drive
Maumee, Ohio 43537
March 16, 2023
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
It is our pleasure to inform you that our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Dana Incorporated will be conducted online on Wednesday, April 26, 2023, starting at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. Shareholders will be able to listen, vote and submit questions from any remote location with Internet connectivity.
The annual report, which is included in this package, summarizes Dana’s major developments and includes our consolidated financial statements.
Whether or not you plan to participate in the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, please either sign and return the accompanying proxy card in the postage-paid envelope or instruct us by telephone or via the Internet indicating how you would like your shares voted. Instructions on how to vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet are on the proxy card enclosed with this proxy statement or the “Notice and Access” card we have provided.
Sincerely,
graphic
James K. Kamsickas
Chairman of the Board of Directors

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic
Dana Incorporated
Notice of Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders
March 16, 2023
Date:
April 26, 2023
Time:
8:30 a.m., Eastern Time
Place:
Online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAN2023
This year’s Virtual Annual Meeting of Shareholders will begin promptly at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. Shareholders will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions from their home or from any remote location that has Internet connectivity. There will be no physical location for shareholders to attend. Shareholders may only participate online by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAN2023.
We invite you to participate in the Dana Incorporated 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to:
1.
Elect ten (10) Directors for a one-year term expiring in 2024 or upon the election and qualification of their successors;
2.
Act on an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
3.
Act on an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
4.
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023;
5.
Vote on the shareholder proposal to require an independent board chairman; and
6.
Transact any other business that is properly submitted before the Annual Meeting or any other adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
The record date for the Annual Meeting is February 27, 2023 (the Record Date). Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date can vote at the Annual Meeting. Dana mailed this Notice of Annual Meeting or a Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials to those shareholders. Action may be taken at the Annual Meeting on any of the foregoing proposals on the date specified above or any date or dates to which the Annual Meeting may be adjourned or postponed.
Dana will have a list of shareholders who can vote available for inspection by shareholders for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, during regular business hours at Dana’s Law Department, 3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, Ohio 43537.
Whether or not you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting and whether you own a few or many shares of stock, the Board of Directors urges you to vote promptly. Registered holders may vote by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card, by using the automated telephone voting system, or by using the Internet voting system. You will find instructions for voting by telephone or by the Internet, in the “Notice and Access” card we have provided and in the “Questions and Answers” section of the proxy statement. Please vote your proxy, then follow the instructions in the “Questions and Answers” section below.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
graphic
March 16, 2023
Douglas H. Liedberg
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Chief Compliance & Sustainability Officer
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on April 26, 2023.
The Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Report are available at www.dana.com/proxy.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic
Dana Incorporated
3939 Technology Drive
Maumee, Ohio 43537
2023 PROXY STATEMENT
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The Board of Directors is soliciting proxies to be used at the Dana Incorporated Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually on Wednesday, April 26, 2023, beginning at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are being made available to shareholders beginning March 16, 2023.
What is a proxy?
A proxy is your authorization for someone else to vote for you in the way that you want to vote. When you complete and submit a proxy card or use the automated telephone voting system or the Internet voting system, you are submitting a proxy. Dana's Board of Directors is soliciting this proxy. All references in this proxy statement to “you” will mean you, the shareholder, and to “yours” will mean the shareholder's or shareholders', as appropriate.
What is a proxy statement?
A proxy statement is a document the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) requires to explain the matters, which you are asked to vote on by proxy and to disclose certain related information. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card were first mailed to the shareholders on or about March 16, 2023.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At our Annual Meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting, including i) the election of directors; ii) an advisory vote on executive compensation; and iii) ratification of the appointment of Dana’s independent registered public accounting firm. Also, management will report on the state of Dana and respond to questions from shareholders.
What is the record date and what does it mean?
The record date for the Annual Meeting is February 27, 2023 (the Record Date). The Record Date was established by the Board of Directors as required by Delaware law. Holders of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Holders of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date may vote at the meeting. On February 27, 2023, 144,329,402 shares of our common stock were outstanding, and accordingly, are eligible to be voted.
What are the voting rights of the holders of common stock?
Each outstanding share of common stock will be entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What is “Notice and Access” and why did Dana elect to use it?
We are making the proxy solicitation materials available to shareholders who hold shares electronically via the Internet under the Notice and Access rules and regulations of the SEC. On or about March 16, 2023, we mailed to such shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) in lieu of mailing a full set of proxy materials. Accordingly, our proxy materials are first being made available to our shareholders on or about March 16, 2023. The Notice includes information on how to access and review the proxy materials and how to vote via the Internet. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. We believe this method of delivery will decrease costs, expedite distribution of proxy materials to you and reduce our environmental impact. We encourage shareholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. Shareholders who received the Notice but would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail should follow the instructions in the Notice for requesting such materials.
What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a “street name” holder?
If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, then the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares. See “How do I vote my shares?” below.
I share an address with another shareholder. Why did we receive only one set of proxy materials?
Dana may satisfy SEC rules regarding delivery of our proxy materials, including our proxy statement, or delivery of the Notice by delivering a single copy of these documents to an address shared by two or more shareholders. This process is known as “householding.” To the extent we have done so, we have delivered only one set of proxy materials or one Notice, as applicable, to shareholders who share an address with another shareholder, unless contrary instructions were received prior to the mailing date.
We undertake to deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of our proxy statement, our 2022 Annual Report and/or our Notice, as requested, to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered. To make such a request,
Internet www.proxyvote.com
Telephone 1-800-579-1639
Email sendmaterial@proxyvote.com
If requesting materials by e-mail, the control number found in the box marked by an arrow on the Notice and Access card will need to be provided in the e-mail request.
If your common stock is held by a brokerage firm or bank and you prefer to receive separate copies of our proxy statement, our 2022 Annual Report or the Notice, either now or in the future, please contact your brokerage or bank. If your brokerage or bank is unable or unwilling to assist you, please make such request using the contact information indicated above.
Shareholders sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and who want to receive a single copy of our annual reports, proxy statements and/or our notices may do so by submitting a request using the contact information provided in this section.
How do I vote my shares?
If you are a registered shareholder of record as of February 27, 2023, as opposed to a street name holder, you will be able to vote in the following ways: by telephone, by the Internet, by mail, or during the Annual Meeting.
TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE: Call toll-free 1-800-690-6903, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m. (ET), on April 25, 2023.
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy.
Make sure you have your proxy card, notice document or email that you received and follow the simple instructions provided.
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(OR)
TO VOTE BY THE INTERNET: www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, until 11:59 p.m. (ET), on April 25, 2023.
Make sure you have your proxy card, notice document or email that you received and follow the simple instructions provided.
(OR)
TO VOTE BY MAIL:
If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may mark, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope that was provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), you should indicate your name and title or capacity.
If you submit a proxy to Dana before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares as you directed. If no instructions are specified, the proxy will be voted: i) “FOR” all of the listed director nominees; ii) “FOR” approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation; iii) “ONE YEAR” for the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation; iv) “FOR” ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm; and v) “AGAINST” the shareholder proposal to require an independent board chairman.
You may revoke a proxy at any time before the proxy is exercised by:
(1)
delivering written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary of Dana at the Dana Law Department, 3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, Ohio 43537;
(2)
submitting another properly completed proxy card that is later dated;
(3)
voting by telephone at a subsequent time; or
(4)
voting by Internet at a subsequent time.
If you hold your shares in “street name,” you must provide voting instructions for your shares in the manner prescribed by your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee. Your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee has enclosed or otherwise provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares.
What is a quorum?
There were 144,329,402 shares of Dana's common stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date. A majority of the issued and outstanding shares or 72,164,702 shares, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum. A quorum must exist to conduct business at the Annual Meeting.
Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?
For shareholders of record: If you are the shareholder of record and you do not vote by proxy card, by telephone or via the Internet, your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting.
For holders in street name: If your shares are held in street name, your shares may be voted even if you do not provide the brokerage firm with voting instructions. Under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules, your broker may vote shares held in street name on certain “routine” matters. The NYSE rules consider the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm to be a routine matter. As a result, your broker is permitted to vote your shares on this matter at its discretion without instruction from you.
When a proposal is not a routine matter, such as the election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation and you have not provided voting instructions to the brokerage firm with respect to that proposal, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. The missing votes for these non-routine matters are called “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but not as shares present and voting on a specific proposal.
What vote is required?
Proposal I - Election of Directors: If a quorum exists, the election requires a plurality vote of the shares present online or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, meaning that the director nominees with the most affirmative votes are elected to fill the available seats. As outlined in our Bylaws, regardless of this plurality vote, any director who receives more “withheld” votes than “for” votes in an uncontested election is required to tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with the
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

procedures set forth in the Bylaws. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then evaluate the best interests of Dana and its shareholders and will recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to the tendered resignation. Following the Board’s determination, Dana will promptly publicly disclose the Board’s decision of whether or not to accept the resignation and an explanation of how the decision was reached, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation. Broker non-votes will not be counted as eligible to vote and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the voting.
Proposal II - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation: The proposal represents an advisory vote and the results will not be binding on the Board or Dana. If a quorum exists, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present online or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter will constitute the shareholders’ non-binding approval with respect to our executive compensation programs. Therefore, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as eligible to vote on the proposal and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the voting on the proposal. The Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.
Proposal III – Advisory Vote on the Frequency of the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation: If a quorum exists, the proposal represents an advisory vote and the results will not be binding on the Board or Dana. While the proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting for approval, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares present or represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter will be considered the shareholders’ non-binding approval as to the frequency of submission to shareholders of executive compensation proposals. Shareholders will be deemed to have approved the alternative (either one, two or three years) that receives the most votes, even if that alternative receives less than a majority of the votes cast. The Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation. Broker non-votes will not be counted as eligible to vote on the applicable proposal and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the voting on the proposal.
Proposal IV - Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: If a quorum exists, the proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present online or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal. Brokers will have discretionary voting power to vote this proposal, so we do not anticipate any broker non-votes (described above).
Proposal V – Shareholder Proposal for Approval of Independent Board Chairman: The shareholder proposal will be voted on at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the shareholder proponent. If a quorum exists, the shareholder proposal must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Therefore, abstentions will have the same effect as voting against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as eligible to vote on the proposal and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the voting on the proposal.
Dana will vote properly completed proxies it receives prior to the Annual Meeting in the way you direct. If you do not specify how you want your shares voted, they will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. If you hold shares in more than one account, you must vote each proxy and/or voting instruction card you receive to ensure that all shares you own are voted. No other matters are currently scheduled to be presented at the Annual Meeting. An independent third party, Broadridge Financial Services, will act as the inspector of the Annual Meeting and the tabulator of votes.
How do I participate in the virtual annual meeting?
All shareholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may participate in the virtual Annual Meeting. Shareholders will be able to log into the virtual annual meeting platform beginning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, April 26, 2023. To participate in the virtual Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DAN2023 and enter your 16-digit control number as indicated on the Notice and Access card. Shareholders may submit questions either before or during the meeting.
Who pays for the costs of the Annual Meeting?
Dana pays the cost of preparing and printing the proxy statement and soliciting proxies. Dana will solicit proxies primarily by mail, but may also solicit proxies personally and by telephone, the Internet, facsimile or other means. Dana will use the services of D.F. King & Co., Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, at a cost of approximately $12,500 plus out-of-pocket expenses and fees for any special services. Officers and regular employees of Dana and its subsidiaries may also solicit proxies, but they will not receive additional compensation for soliciting proxies. Dana will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners of Dana's common stock.
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

How can shareholders propose business (other than nominations) for consideration by shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?
Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in Dana’s Proxy Materials – Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), we must receive shareholder proposals by November 17, 2023, to consider them for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. A shareholder submitting a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials must comply with Rule 14a-8.
Other Proposals for Consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting – A shareholder who intends to propose an item of business at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (not for inclusion in our proxy materials) must comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Under Dana's Bylaws, our shareholders must provide advance notice to Dana in such cases. For the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, notice must be received by Dana's Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on January 26, 2024 and no earlier than the open of business on December 28, 2023.
If Dana moves the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to a date that is more than 25 days before or after the date which is the one-year anniversary of this year's Annual Meeting date (i.e., April 26, 2024), Dana must receive your notice no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the meeting date is first distributed to shareholders or Dana makes a public announcement of the meeting date, whichever occurs first.
Under Dana’s Bylaws, the notice of proposed business must include a description of the business and the reasons for bringing the proposed business to the meeting, any material interest of the shareholder in the business and certain other information about the shareholder. Dana's Bylaws specifying the advance notice and additional requirements for submission of shareholder proposals are available on Dana's website at www.dana.com.
How can shareholders nominate individuals for election as directors for consideration by shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?
Director Nominations for Inclusion in Dana’s Proxy Materials (Proxy Access) – Pursuant to Dana’s Bylaws, a shareholder (or a group of up to 20 shareholders) who has continuously owned at least 3% of our shares for at least three years and has complied with the other requirements of our Bylaws may nominate and include in Dana’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to 25% of Dana’s Board. Notice of a proxy access nomination for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting must be received no later than the close of business on November 16, 2023 and no earlier than the open of business on October 17, 2023.
Other Nominations for Consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting – A shareholder who intends to nominate a person for election as a director at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than under proxy access) must comply with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Under Dana's Bylaws, our shareholders must provide advance notice to Dana in such cases. For the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, notice must be received by Dana's Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on January 27, 2024 and no earlier than the open of business on December 27, 2023.
If Dana moves the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to a date that is more than 25 days before or after the date which is the one-year anniversary of this year's Annual Meeting date (i.e., April 26, 2024), Dana must receive your notice no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the meeting date is first distributed to shareholders or Dana makes a public announcement of the meeting date, whichever occurs first.
Additionally, to comply with the SEC’s universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice for each nomination of a Director that includes the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
In All Cases – Whether a nomination is made under our proxy access bylaw or under our advance notice bylaw, a shareholder’s notice to nominate individuals for election to the Board of Directors must provide information about the shareholder and the nominee, as well as the written consent of the proposed nominee to being named in the proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. Dana's Bylaws specifying the proxy access, advance notice and additional requirements for submission of nominations are available on Dana's website at www.dana.com.
Where should shareholders send proposals for business and director nominations for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?
All shareholder nominations of individuals for election as directors or proposals of other items of business to be considered by shareholders at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be submitted in writing to our Corporate Secretary, Dana Incorporated, 3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, Ohio 43537.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

How many of Dana's directors are independent?
Dana's Board of Directors has determined that nine (9) of the ten (10) directors being nominated for election are independent. For a discussion of the Board of Directors' basis for this determination, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Director Independence.”
Does Dana have a Code of Ethics?
Yes, Dana has Standards of Business Conduct for Employees, which applies to employees and agents of Dana and its subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as Standards of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors. The Standards of Business Conduct for Employees and Standards of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors are available on Dana's website at www.dana.com.
Is this year's proxy statement available electronically?
Yes. You may view this proxy statement and the proxy card, as well as the 2022 Annual Report, electronically by going to our website at www.dana.com/proxy and clicking on the document you wish to view, either the proxy statement and proxy card or annual report.
How can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?
Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If the official results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
A copy of Dana's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the SEC, may be obtained without charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Dana Incorporated, 3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, Ohio 43537.
The proxy statement and Dana’s annual report to shareholders are available on our website at www.dana.com/proxy.
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Following are the names and ages of the executive officers of Dana, their positions with Dana and summaries of their backgrounds and business experience. Our executive officers serve on Dana’s Executive Leadership Team. All executive officers are elected or appointed by the Board of Directors and hold office until the annual meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of shareholders in each year.
Name
Age as of February 27, 2023
Principal Occupation and Business
Experience During Past 5 Years
Executive Officer
Aziz S. Aghili
64
Executive Vice President and President, Heavy Vehicle (since April 2021), Executive Vice President and President, Off-Highway Drive and Motion Systems (August 2018 to April 2021), President, Off-Highway Drive and Motion Systems (July 2011 to August 2018), Dana Incorporated.
2011 - Present
Byron S. Foster
54
President, Light Vehicle Drive Systems (since July 2021), Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial, Marketing and Communications Officer (February 2021 to July 2021), Dana Incorporated. Prior to joining Dana, Mr. Foster was Chief Executive Officer at Shield T3, LLC (September 2020 to February 2021) and Executive Vice President, Seating at Adient plc (October 2016 to February 2019).
2021 - Present
James K. Kamsickas
56
Mr. Kamsickas has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since December 2019 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Dana Incorporated since August 2015. Prior to joining Dana, Mr. Kamsickas served as President and Chief Executive Officer of International Automotive Components (IAC) Group S.A., a leading global supplier of automotive interior components and systems. He also served as a member of IAC’s Board of Directors from 2007-2015. Prior to that, he spent 18 years at Lear Corporation in numerous domestic and international positions, ultimately as leader of its Interior Systems Division.
2015 - Present
Timothy R. Kraus
54
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since December 2021), Senior Vice President of Finance and Treasurer (January 2017 to December 2021), Vice President of Finance and Treasurer (December 2016 to January 2017), Dana Incorporated.
2021 - Present
Douglas H. Liedberg
55
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Compliance and Sustainability Officer (since January 2020), Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Compliance Officer (since May 2017), Associate General Counsel (November 2008 to April 2017), Dana Incorporated.
2017 - Present
Antonio Valencia
57
President, Power Technologies and Senior Vice President, Global Electrification, (since April 2020), Senior Vice President, China and India (January 2016 to April 2020), Dana Incorporated.
2020 - Present
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) provides information about the executive compensation philosophy, key principles and approaches the Company uses to determine the elements of compensation awarded to, earned by and paid to each of our named executive officers (NEOs) during 2022. This discussion offers context to the compensation disclosures included in the accompanying compensation tables and corresponding narrative discussion and footnotes below, and it should be read in conjunction with those disclosures.
Our NEOs for 2022 whose compensation is discussed in this CD&A and is included in the related tables are:
Name
Title
James K. Kamsickas
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Timothy R. Kraus
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Aziz S. Aghili
Executive Vice President and President, Heavy Vehicle
Byron S. Foster
Senior Vice President and President, Light Vehicle Drive Systems
Douglas H. Liedberg
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Compliance and Sustainability Officer
Executive Overview
Business Highlights
Dana Incorporated is a leader in the design and manufacture of highly efficient propulsion and energy-management solutions that power vehicles and machines in all mobility markets across the globe. Dana has taken a leading position in vehicle electrification by transforming the company, with roots dating back 120 years, from its foundation as a mechanical systems supplier to being at the forefront of powertrain electrification with complete in-house capability for electric vehicle propulsion applications.
Today, Dana is positioned to deliver all elements of a complete, fully integrated electrified system across all mobility markets, anywhere in the world. We have accelerated this transformation across all aspects of the business by leveraging synergies through our people, customer relationships, operations, and technology, resulting in exponential sales growth in both traditional and new energy applications. The company exceeded $10 billion in sales for the first time while navigating extreme, generational levels of inflation, relentless supply-chain and customer schedule volatility challenges, as well as skilled labor shortages in many areas of the world.
Despite this difficult environment, Dana employees around the globe have enabled the company to support its customers the right way by delivering best-in-industry employee safety performance, driving actions to reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 75 percent by 2030 – with plans to achieve net zero by 2040 – and creating an environment of diversity, equity, and inclusion that allows all employees to grow and lead.
These accomplishments have been recognized at the highest levels of the industry as Dana was named a top employer around the world and honored with numerous sustainability, diversity, equity, and inclusion recognitions, including being named by Newsweek magazine as one of America's “most responsible companies” and “greatest workplaces for diversity”. The company was also listed in the National Diversity Council Index for the first time, scored in the 90th percentile for the automotive sector of the S&P Global Corporate Sustainability index, and ranked highest among core competitors on the prestigious Drucker Institute list of best-managed companies.
Despite the year’s headwinds, the company continued to methodically execute its strategy, which starts with “leveraging the core”. This foundational concept emphasizes a relentless passion for teamwork and driving synergies across all aspects of the business to create value. It is fundamental to delivering superior innovation and technological advancement along with exceptional customer satisfaction and was a driving factor in why Dana’s Spicer Electrified™ integrated e-Powertrain was named a 2022 Automotive News PACE Award winner, demonstrating the company’s ability to deliver a completely integrated e-System for its customers.
Over the past year, Dana also received recognition from numerous global customers across our end markets, including Caterpillar, Ford Motor Company, Daimler Truck, Jaguar-Land Rover, PACCAR, John Deere, and Toyota. The company earned General Motors’ prestigious Overdrive Award, which recognizes outstanding achievements in sustainability, innovation, cultural alignment, total enterprise cost, new program launch, and sustainability.
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dana’s Compensation Philosophy
The objective of our executive compensation program is to retain, attract, motivate and reward our senior leaders in the successful execution of our strategy. Our long-range enterprise strategy builds on our strong foundation of innovation and technology and leverages our operating model, driving cross functional resource sharing while maintaining a customer centric focus. Our strategy furthers the expansion of our global markets and accelerates the commercialization of new technology, enabling us to sustain a profitable growth trajectory while capitalizing on our position as a leader in electrified mobility. The program is designed to balance short-term performance with long-term growth, offering compensation and benefits that are competitive with executive compensation arrangements provided to executive officers at similar levels at comparably sized companies with whom we compete for talent.
Dana’s executive compensation philosophy is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, with a focus on the following key goals:
Reward performance – A substantial percentage of executive pay is performance-based and therefore at risk. Our pay programs reflect our “pay-for-performance” culture that aligns incentives with shareholder interests.
Drive ownership mentality – We require executives to personally invest in Dana’s success through stock ownership guidelines that require executives to own a significant amount of our stock.
Emphasize long-term incentive compensation – We share a portion of the value created for shareholders with those responsible for the results through our performance-based long-term incentive compensation plans. Performance Shares reward executives for delivering long-term profitability and cash flow performance.
Retain, reward and attract the best talent to achieve superior results – To consistently outperform our competitors, it is crucial that we retain and recruit superior talent capable of driving superior results. We have structured our compensation program to motivate and reward these results.
Dana’s Executive Compensation Practices
Dana’s executive compensation program features many best practices that serve shareholder interests.
What We Do
What We Don’t Do
Base half of our long-term compensation on the achievement of objective, pre-established goals tied to financial, operational, and strategic measures.
No excise tax gross ups.
Award incentive compensation based on objective measures.
No excessive perquisites.
Apply leading practice stock ownership guidelines.
No hedging or pledging of Dana stock.
Maintain a clawback policy to recapture unearned incentive payments in the event of a restatement of our financial results.
No excessive change-in-control or executive severance provisions.
Retain an independent compensation consultant.
No payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards.
Include double-trigger vesting of equity awards and severance payments upon a change in control.
Say on Pay and Shareholder Engagement
At the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, more than 94% of votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee considered the favorable Say on Pay vote and other factors explained in our CD&A in evaluating the effectiveness of our executive compensation program, and in 2022 approved changes and other refinements to elements of our program to ensure the continued alignment of Dana’s strategy and business goals with shareholders’ long-term interests. Changes to the executive compensation program are described in further detail later in this discussion and analysis. We maintain an on-going dialogue with our shareholders and welcome feedback regarding our executive compensation program.
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relationship Between Dana’s Pay and Performance
Compensation Peer Group
One of the factors our Compensation Committee uses in setting executive compensation is an evaluation of how our target compensation and benefits levels compare with those of similarly situated executives at companies that comprise our executive compensation peer group (Peer Group). Dana’s philosophy for senior executive pay, including NEO pay, is to target a range of +/-15% of the 50th percentile of our Peer Group and general industry market data as provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. In addition to market data, other factors, such as an individual’s experience, responsibilities and long-term strategic value to Dana, are also considered when making recommendations and decisions on compensation.
The Peer Group used for benchmarking executive pay for all NEOs is made up of companies that are:
in similar industries where Dana competes for talent, customers and capital including automotive parts and equipment, high-tech industrial, construction and farm machinery, heavy trucks and other durable goods manufacturers,
of similar size (as measured by annual revenue), with a range of approximately 1/3rd to 3x Dana’s revenue that results in a median revenue close to Dana’s, and
of similar complexity to Dana (e.g., multi-country and multi-segment with an emphasis on technology).
The Peer Group is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and modifications are made to ensure each company in the group meets the above comparison criteria. The 22 companies shown in the table below comprised our Peer Group:
Adient plc
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
Aptiv PLC
Ingersoll-Rand Inc.
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
LCI Industries
BorgWarner Inc.
Lear Corporation
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
Meritor, Inc.
Cummins Inc.
Oshkosh Corporation
Dover Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Eaton Corporation plc
Tenneco Inc.
Emerson Electric Co.
Terex Corporation
Flowserve Corporation
The Timken Company
Fortive Corporation
Trane Technologies plc
The Compensation Committee, after review with its independent compensation consultant, determined that the companies comprising the 2021 Peer Group continued to meet the comparison criteria with several adjustments. Navistar International was removed following its merger with TRATON GROUP in 2021. To maintain a balanced peer group, the Compensation Committee approved the inclusion of Aptiv and LCI Industries as they meet the above criteria, serving similar end markets. Aptiv is a historical competitor for executive talent.
Pay for Performance
We believe it is important to look at how NEO realizable pay compares to Dana’s performance because realizable pay is the pay that NEOs actually or could potentially receive and demonstrates how pay is linked to performance. The Compensation Committee and management analyzed the alignment between the pay of our NEOs and Dana’s three-year (2019-2021) performance relative to the Peer Group. The table below provides the definition of realizable pay and the performance metrics that were used for the pay-for-performance comparison.
Realizable Pay and Performance Measurement
Realizable Pay includes base salary, actual bonus payouts and theoretical gains of long-term incentive grants from 2019 through 2021 (“in-the-money” portion of options, all restricted stock awards/units granted, target value of performance plans where actual performance is unknown and actual award for performance plans with known payouts). Long-term incentives include the value of the awards granted at the end of the three-year period, which is not necessarily the value at vesting or exercise.
Note that this definition differs from that of summary compensation table pay, which represents the grant-date fair value of the long-term incentive awards.

For purposes of this analysis, we used an equally weighted composite of free cash flow growth, EBITDA growth, return on invested capital and revenue growth, commonly accepted key financial metrics, in order to evaluate and compare our performance with Peer Group companies.
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following graphs show the correlation between realizable pay and the financial performance metrics indicated above over the three-year period from 2019 through 2021 for Dana’s CEO and other NEOs, and the CEOs and other NEOs in our Peer Group. Performance is indicated across the horizontal axis (stronger performance from left to right) and compensation is reflected on the vertical axis (higher pay from bottom to top) of each of the graphs. Trane Technologies and Ingersoll-Rand were excluded from the analysis as each lacks the three full years of data.
graphic

graphic
2022 Compensation at a Glance
To align pay levels for our NEOs with Dana’s performance, our pay mix places the greatest emphasis on performance-based incentives. A significant majority (90% of our Chairman and CEO’s 2022 target compensation and 76% of the average 2022 target compensation of our other NEOs) is performance-based.
graphic
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elements of the 2022 Executive Compensation Program
Our annual executive compensation program has three primary pay components: base salary, annual performance-based cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives. We also offer retirement and additional benefits.
COST TO
DANA
ELEMENT
KEY
CHARACTERISTICS
WHY WE PAY
THIS ELEMENT
DETERMINING
FACTORS
FIXED
Base salary
Fixed compensation payable in cash. Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate.
Provide base level of competitive cash compensation for retaining and attracting executive talent.
Experience, job scope, market data and individual performance.
VARIABLE
Annual cash incentive award
Variable compensation payable in cash based on performance-related financial and individual goals.
Incentivize high performance levels and reward short-term consolidated and individual performance.
Corporate funding pool is based 80% on three equally weighted financial performance metrics (Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Electrification Sales) aligned with the annual operating plan, and 20% on individual performance goals tied to the delivery of strategic and other objectives.
Performance share awards (PSAs)
PSAs vest after a three-year performance period based on achieving financial and shareholder return metrics.
Align the interests of senior executives with those of shareholders around long-term value creation and executive talent retention.
Target awards based on job scope, market data and individual performance.
Minimize short-term risk-taking behaviors in the interest of positive long-term results.
Payouts are earned on the basis of performance associated with specified growth-based financial metrics (Adjusted EBITDA growth and Adjusted Free Cash Flow growth relative to initial baseline targets) and Relative Total Shareholder Return over a three-year period.
Restricted stock units (RSUs)
RSUs vest ratably on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.
Increase long-term equity ownership and focus executives on providing shareholders with superior investment returns.
Target award based on job scope, market data and individual performance.
Vesting terms and ownership guidelines promote retention and a strong linkage to the long-term interests of shareholders.
Base Salary
We provide base salaries to compensate our NEOs for their primary roles and responsibilities, and to provide a stable level of annual compensation. Actual NEO salary levels and increases, where applicable, vary based on the NEO’s role, level of responsibility, experience, individual performance, future potential and market value. In addition, salary increases may be warranted because of a promotion or change in responsibilities.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Compensation Committee approved the 2022 annualized base salaries shown in the table below. Mr. Kraus’s salary was set upon his appointment as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2021 and remained unchanged for 2022. Similarly, Mr. Aghili was provided a salary increase in April 2021 while assuming additional responsibilities and his salary was unchanged as he maintained those responsibilities through 2022. The increase provided to Mr. Foster was made to align his annual salary with base compensation comparable to executives in similar positions within our Peer Group.
NEO
2021 Salary
2022 Salary
Percent Increase
James K. Kamsickas
$1,250,000
$1,275,000
2.0%
Timothy R. Kraus
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
Aziz S. Aghili
$ 650,000
$ 650,000
Byron S. Foster
$ 525,000
$ 590,000
12.4%
Douglas H. Liedberg
$ 550,000
$ 572,500
3.1%
Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive
The Dana Annual Incentive Plan (AIP), is a cash-based annual bonus plan intended to motivate and reward employees based on Dana’s consolidated financial results as well as individual performance that drives shareholder value.
The AIP covers approximately 4,400 employees, including our NEOs. At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves an annual cash bonus target for each NEO as a percentage of base salary for the upcoming performance period. The NEOs may earn from 0% to 200% of their target incentive opportunity. The annual incentive payout is comprised of 80% weighting allocated to consolidated financial metrics and 20% weighting allocated to individual performance goals focused on driving strategic, operational and other priorities of the business.
The 2022 AIP target payout opportunities with respect to our NEOs are shown in the table below:
NEO
AIP Target
Opportunity
(% of Base
Salary)
James K. Kamsickas
150%
Timothy R. Kraus
75%
Aziz S. Aghili
80%
Byron S. Foster
75%
Douglas H. Liedberg
75%
Following a Peer Group compensation benchmarking review and an evaluation of our NEOs’ respective roles and responsibilities, the Compensation Committee approved increases to the AIP target opportunities for Messrs. Kamsickas (from 125% to 150%), Foster (from 65% to 75%) and Liedberg (from 70% to 75%) effective with the 2022 plan year.
2022 AIP performance was based on the four key metrics shown in the table below and was designed to reward the achievement of performance goals at the consolidated and individual levels. Each of the financial performance metrics maintained an equal weighting in the 2022 plan, designed to provide an appropriate level of motivation around profitability and free cash flow, which are key value drivers of our business. To reflect Dana’s accelerating transformation into electrified mobility and incentivize the rapid commercialization and growth of electrified products, the Compensation Committee approved the replacement of Adjusted EBITDA Margin with Electrification Sales as the third financial performance metric.
Annual Incentive Plan Metrics
2022 Weighting
Financial Performance Metrics
Adjusted EBITDA
1/3rd
}
80%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow
1/3rd
Electrification Sales
1/3rd
Individual Performance Goals
20%
The Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow measures used in our publicly reported financial results form the basis of the performance metrics that are components of our AIP. Adjustments to EBITDA generally include equity grant expense, restructuring expense, non-service cost components of pension and other postretirement benefits costs and other adjustments not related to our
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

core operations (e.g., gains or losses on debt extinguishment, pension settlements, divestitures and impairments, etc.). Adjustments to Free Cash Flow include discretionary pension contributions. For the purpose of calculating the annual incentive award, an additional adjustment is made to remove the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations on Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow, which may have a significant impact on our financial results given our global footprint, and which is not within management’s control.
Company Financial Metrics
Dana’s financial performance makes up 80% of the overall AIP awards for the NEOs and is measured by three equally weighted financial metrics: Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Electrification Sales. We believe these metrics are appropriate measures of our underlying earnings, align with our business enterprise strategy and our external financial reporting commitments, and drive shareholder value. 
graphic
To determine the payout level for annual incentive awards, performance for the year is measured against specified targets for each financial and individual performance goal. Each of the three financial metric targets was based on achieving a level of performance which, at the time, was anticipated to be challenging but attainable. The threshold level was set to be reflective of performance at which the Compensation Committee believed a portion of the award opportunity should be earned. The maximum level was set well above the target, requiring significant achievements and reflecting performance at which the Compensation Committee believed a 200% target award is warranted.
AIP Performance
Weighting, target performance, actual performance and the payout associated with each of the 2022 AIP metrics are shown in the table below. Metric weightings and performance ranges approved by the Compensation Committee are intended to complement the rigor inherent in our target-setting processes by further incentivizing the attainment of superior performance outcomes.
AIP Performance Metrics
Weight
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Actual
Payout
(% of Target)
Adjusted EBITDA
1/3rd
$808M
$950M
$1,021M
$744M
0%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow
1/3rd
$264M
$310M
$333M
$253M
0%
Electrification Sales
1/3rd
$425M
$500M
$538M
$590M
200%
Weighted Payout for Financial Metrics
66.7%
Individual Performance Goals
The NEOs’ individual performance makes up 20% of the overall AIP award. For 2022, each executive leader, including our NEOs, was accountable for individual goals focused on driving specific priorities such as, but not limited to, employee safety commitments, quality performance, sales growth and other customer-centric objectives, financial performance, operational efficiencies and continuous improvement initiatives, inclusion and diversity outcomes, sustainability actions and execution of our overall business strategy.
graphic
The Compensation Committee reviews the strategic, operational and other individual performance goals for the Chairman and CEO and other NEOs. The Chairman and CEO sets forth each of the other NEO’s individual goals (and the weighting of each goal), subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee sets the individual goals and weighting of each goal for the Chairman and CEO.
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The levels of achievement (0% - 200% of targeted goals) for the individual performance goals portion of the 2022 annual incentive award for each of our NEOs were: Mr. Kamsickas (108.5%); Mr. Kraus (101.0%); Mr. Aghili (112.5%); Mr. Foster 112.4%) and Mr. Liedberg (123.9%).
2022 Annual Incentive Plan Results
The annual incentive payments for our NEOs under the 2022 AIP, based on financial and individual performance described above, are shown in the following table.
NEO
2022 Award
James K. Kamsickas
$1,435,523
Timothy R. Kraus
$ 331,020
Aziz S. Aghili
$ 394,472
Byron S. Foster
$ 335,592
Douglas H. Liedberg
$ 335,514
The performance and payout range (threshold, target and maximum incentive opportunity) of annual cash incentives for each of our NEOs is provided in the table titled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards”. The actual award paid, as shown in the table above, is also provided in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” below.
Long-Term Incentive Program
We believe that Dana’s long-term performance is driven through an ownership culture that rewards executives for creating and maximizing shareholder value. Our Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP) provides participants, including our NEOs, with incentive awards that serve an important role by balancing short-term goals with long-term shareholder value creation while minimizing risk-taking behaviors that could negatively affect long-term results.
The Compensation Committee approves the amount of the long-term incentive award, which is based on a percentage of the NEO’s base salary. Each NEO’s award opportunity is based on a target dollar value (determined prior to the beginning of the performance period) assigned to his or her position based on market comparisons for similar positions, using both Peer Group and general industry market data. Following its market data review for 2022, the Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Kamsickas’ LTIP target opportunity from 575% to 700% of base salary to maintain alignment with long-term compensation opportunities afforded chief executive officers of the companies in Dana’s Peer Group. Similarly, the Compensation Committee approved a target opportunity for Mr. Foster at 225% of base salary in alignment with peer and market comparisons.
NEO
LTIP Target
Opportunity
(% of Base
Salary)
James K. Kamsickas
700%
Timothy R. Kraus
250%
Aziz S. Aghili
250%
Byron S. Foster
225%
Douglas H. Liedberg
200%
Half of the total value of the target long-term incentive opportunity is delivered through performance share awards (PSAs) and the other half through restricted stock units (RSUs). We believe both PSAs and RSUs are forms of performance-based incentive compensation because PSAs provide direct alignment with shareholder interests and the value of RSUs fluctuates based on stock price performance.
In addition to requiring achievement of performance criteria in respect of the performance shares, PSAs and RSUs require the NEO to remain employed with Dana for three years from the grant date, unless the NEO departs and is retirement eligible (retirement is defined as age 60 with at least 10 years of service, or age 65 regardless of service) whereby a prorated award is paid. The grant date value of PSAs and RSUs granted to each of our NEOs in 2022 (using the valuation methodologies required by the SEC disclosure rules) is shown in the “Summary Compensation Table”.
15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Shares
The LTIP is designed to provide PSAs to a select group of senior executives, including our NEOs. PSAs are tied to the achievement of two financial performance measures of equal weight, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow, and Total Shareholder Return relative to a pre-established index (“Relative TSR”). Each metric is measured over a three-year performance period (2022-2024) and PSAs can be earned from 0% to 200% of target opportunity. This combination of metrics incentivizes performance associated with profitability, cash flow and shareholder return and is intended to drive execution of our long-term financial and strategic objectives while aligning with investor interests. The value of performance shares is also tied to Dana’s stock price performance, which further aligns the executives’ interests with those of shareholders.
The target opportunities of PSAs for the NEOs are shown in the table below:
NEO
PSA 2022 Target Award
Opportunity (# shares)
James K. Kamsickas
199,041
Timothy R. Kraus
33,452
Aziz S. Aghili
36,239
Byron S. Foster
29,605
Douglas H. Liedberg
25,535
Restricted Stock Units
The other half of the LTIP design consists of RSU awards. We use RSUs to motivate and reward executives for improving long-term stock value and to serve as a retention tool. RSUs are generally granted in February to approximately 175 senior management employees, including our NEOs, and vest ratably on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date, provided the recipient remains employed by Dana when the awards vest. The RSUs awarded in 2022 to the NEOs are shown in the table below. Mr. Kraus received the second of two grants of RSUs awarded upon being named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Liedberg was awarded an additional grant of RSUs in recognition for leading the Company’s successful sustainability and social responsibility initiatives.
NEO
Number of RSUs
Awarded in 2022
James K. Kamsickas
199,041
Timothy R. Kraus
33,452
Aziz S. Aghili
36,239
Byron S. Foster
29,605
Douglas H. Liedberg
25,535
Equity awards granted to each of our NEOs are shown in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table and “Summary Compensation Table” below.
2020 LTIP Performance (three-year performance period ending December 31, 2022)
December 31, 2022 marked the end of the three-year performance period for the 2020 LTIP awards. The performance metrics, targets and performance payout ranges for these awards were set and approved by the Compensation Committee in January 2020.
Under the 2020 LTIP, PSAs could be earned by the NEOs based on performance associated with two equally weighted metrics, Adjusted EBITDA Margin, measured as an average over the three-year performance period, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow, measured on a cumulative basis over the same three-year performance period. The target levels of achievement for each metric were set at the beginning of the three-year performance period to align with aggressive financial objectives established within our 2020 through 2022 operating plan.
16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The COVID-19 pandemic, directly and indirectly in the form of severe labor shortages, extraordinary supply chain disruptions and historically high levels of input cost inflation, had a significant impact on our financial results over the entirety of the performance period. As a result, the performance of both metrics fell below the threshold level for a payout. While recognizing the extraordinary circumstances of the pandemic and their impact over the performance period, the Compensation Committee took into consideration pay for performance as well as our stockholders’ interests and decided against the use of discretion. Accordingly, no PSAs were earned by the NEOs under the 2020 LTIP. The table below summarizes the results of the 2020 LTIP.
Performance Measures
for PSAs
Equal Weighting
2020-2022 Targets
2020-2022
Performance
2022
Actual
Award
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (3-year average)
10.7%
11.9%
13.1%
8.0%
0%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow (3-year cumulative)
$850M
$1,045M
$1,240M
$57M
0%
Weighted Payout:
0%
The actual payout of PSAs to the NEOs, awarded as part of the 2020 LTIP and based on the results shown above for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2022, is reflected in the table below. Mr. Foster joined the Company in 2021 and, as such, did not receive an award under the 2020 LTIP. See footnote 3 of the Summary Compensation Table for additional details involving the PSAs granted in 2020.
NEO
Performance
Shares Target Award
(# shares)
Performance Share
Payout
(# shares)
James K. Kamsickas
221,459
0
Timothy R. Kraus
11,381
0
Aziz S. Aghili
43,887
0
Douglas H. Liedberg
33,959
0
Other Elements of Compensation
To remain competitive with other companies and to retain, attract and motivate highly talented executives, we provided certain other benefits to our NEOs in 2022, including health, wellness and retirement benefits.
Executive Perquisites
We do not offer significant individual perquisites to our NEOs such as car allowances, club memberships, and tax and financial planning.
International Assignment Benefits
We maintain an International Assignment Policy for certain employees who accept an international assignment at the request of Dana. The benefits under this program generally include some or all of the following benefits as needed: cost of living allowance, location premium, relocation allowance, housing allowance, transportation allowance, tax preparation, assignment completion payment, repatriation allowance and annual home leave. Mr. Aghili received benefits under this program in 2022 reflecting trailing tax-related items associated with the end of his assignment and repatriation in 2020.
For more information on the benefits provided to Mr. Aghili, see the “Summary Compensation Table” and related footnotes.
Health and Welfare – Wellness Benefits
We provide other benefits such as medical, dental, life insurance, accidental disability and dismemberment insurance, short-term disability and long-term disability to our NEOs, which are also provided to all eligible U.S.-based salaried employees. Eligible employees can purchase additional life, dependent life and accidental death and dismemberment coverage as part of their employee benefits package. Our NEOs and certain other manager-level employees may also purchase supplemental long-term disability insurance.
As part of our employee health and wellness benefit initiatives, we provide an executive physical program to certain executives, including our NEOs, in which we strongly encourage participation. The benefit provides an annual routine wellness examination and comprehensive physical at a cost to Dana of approximately $2,500 per executive with a slightly higher cost for initial participation.
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Retirement Benefits
We maintain a tax-qualified, “safe harbor” 401(k) plan for our employees, including the NEOs. Eligible participants may make voluntary contributions to the plan up to Internal Revenue Code limits. Dana makes both matching contributions and a fixed contribution to each eligible employee’s 401(k) plan account. We match 100% of the employee’s contributions up to 3% of compensation and 50% of the employee’s contributions from 3% to 5% of compensation, providing a maximum employer match of 4% of compensation to an employee. We give a company fixed contribution equal to 3.5% of each eligible employee’s compensation.
We provide a non-qualified savings plan (restoration plan), to which we credit amounts to participants, including our NEOs, that we would have otherwise provided as matching and fixed contributions under the 401(k) plan if IRS statutory limits on 401(k) plan contributions had not been applicable.
We also administer a non-qualified defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) for certain executives, including certain of our NEOs. A portion of the SERP benefit is based on our performance.
We offer a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows eligible employees, including our NEOs, to defer base salary and/or incentive pay to be paid at a future date. For more information regarding our non-qualified retirement programs, see the narrative following the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table.
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Role of the Compensation Committee and Chairman and CEO
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors assists the Board in fulfilling its obligations related to the compensation of Dana’s executive officers and, in general, with respect to compensation and benefits programs relating to all employees. Our current Compensation Committee consists of a chair and independent directors who are appointed annually by the Board. Under its Charter, the Compensation Committee must have a minimum of three members who meet the requirements for independence as set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and our Standards of Director Independence. Members of the Committee must also qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 16b-3.
Rachel A. Gonzalez served as Chair of the Compensation Committee for part of 2022 before her decision to not stand for reelection to Dana’s Board of Directors. Ms. Gonzalez was succeeded by Michael J. Mack, Jr. who was named Chair and served in that capacity for the remainder of the year. The other members of the Compensation Committee serving in 2022 included Ernesto M. Hernández, Brett M. Icahn and R. Bruce McDonald.
The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
Reviewing our executive compensation philosophy and strategy;
Participating in the performance evaluation process for our Chairman and CEO;
Setting base salary and incentive opportunities for our Chairman and CEO and other senior executives;
Establishing the overarching pay philosophy for Dana’s management team;
Establishing incentive compensation and performance goals and objectives for our executive officers and other eligible executives and management, and determining whether performance objectives have been achieved; and
Recommending employment and severance agreements for our Chairman and CEO and other senior executives to the Board.
The Compensation Committee holds executive sessions without the participation of any member of executive management, including the NEOs, typically to discuss compensation matters pertaining to the Chairman and CEO. Each year, the Committee reviews the performance and total compensation package of our NEOs and reviews and establishes each NEO’s total target and actual compensation for the current year including base salary, annual bonus opportunities and long-term incentive awards.
Our Chairman and CEO is responsible for making recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding base salary and incentive opportunities for the NEOs other than with respect to his own compensation.
Compensation decisions are made by the Compensation Committee using its sole judgment. The Compensation Committee focuses primarily on each NEO’s performance against his or her financial and strategic objectives, Dana’s overall performance, and a business unit’s performance where applicable, while reserving authority to make decisions based on overall business performance, conditions and challenges.
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee’s charter states the Committee may retain outside compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisors. The Committee retains an independent compensation consultant, Mercer US LLC (Mercer), a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC), to advise it on certain compensation matters. The Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate and terminate any independent compensation consultants of its choosing.
In connection with the Compensation Committee’s engagement of Mercer, the Committee considered factors relevant to Mercer’s independence, including six factors specified by NYSE rules, and determined that Mercer’s work does not raise any conflict of interest. The Committee requested Mercer’s advice on a variety of issues, including compensation strategy, market comparisons, review of our Peer Group, pay and performance alignment versus industry peers, executive pay trends, stock ownership guidelines, compensation best practices and potential compensation plan designs and modifications.
Mercer provided the Peer Group and general industry compensation data to management and the Compensation Committee, and it was used as a frame of reference for establishing compensation targets for base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentives for all of our NEOs at the beginning of 2022.
In addition to its services for the Compensation Committee, separate and distinct from executive and director compensation consulting services, Mercer provided select services for Dana in various other capacities in 2022. Those services included other global compensation consulting where Mercer data was most relevant in a given country. Mercer’s fees for executive compensation consulting in fiscal year 2022 were $272,354. During the fiscal year, Dana retained Mercer (and its MMC affiliates) to provide services unrelated to executive compensation. The aggregate fees paid for these other services were $20,510. These other services were not approved by our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee because they relate to broad-based compensation and benefit plans. Our management used Pay Governance LLC (Pay Governance) for additional executive compensation advice.
Compensation Policies and Practices
Dana’s Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our NEOs must comply with stock ownership guidelines that require executives to own a significant number of shares of our common stock. The stock ownership guidelines are calculated based on a multiple of the executive’s annual base salary and the average stock price during the prior calendar year.
In determining that the ownership requirements are satisfied, we generally include RSUs that have been granted and any shares owned outright by the executive. Stock options and unearned performance shares are not counted in determining stock ownership for this purpose. Executives have five years beginning from date of hire or promotion into an applicable role in which to attain compliance. The sale of shares acquired upon vesting of awards is restricted until the ownership requirements, shown below, have been met.
Title
Ownership as a
Multiple of
Base Salary
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
8x
Chief Financial Officer
5x
Executive Vice Presidents and General Counsel
3x
Senior Vice Presidents
1x
All NEOs had exceeded, met or were on track to meet their ownership requirement as established under our guidelines.
Clawback Provisions
To mitigate risk to Dana of paying either annual or long-term incentives based on faulty financial results, we have a policy (Clawback Policy) regarding adjustment of performance-based compensation in the event of a restatement of our financial results. It provides that the Compensation Committee will review all bonuses and other compensation paid or awarded to our executive officers based on the achievement of corporate performance goals during the period covered by a restatement. If the amount of such compensation paid or payable to any executive officer based on the originally reported financial results differs from the amount that would have been paid or payable based on the restated financial results, the Committee will make a recommendation to the independent members of the Board as to whether to seek recovery from the executive officer of any compensation exceeding that to which he or she would have been entitled based on the restated results. In the case of Mr. Kamsickas, his executive employment agreement sets forth clawback provisions in addition to the Clawback Policy provisions described above. These additional clawback provisions are described below under “CEO Employment Agreement.”
19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hedging and Pledging of Dana Stock
Under the terms of our “Insider Trading Policy”, no employee, officer or non-employee Director is permitted to engage in securities transactions that would allow them either to insulate themselves from, or profit from, a decline in Dana’s stock price. Similarly, no employee, officer or director may enter into hedging transactions in Dana’s stock. Such transactions include, but are not limited to, short sales as well as any hedging transactions in derivative securities (e.g., puts, calls, options, swaps, forward contracts or collars) or other speculative transactions relating to Dana’s stock. Pledging of Dana’s stock is also prohibited.
Equity-Based Grant Practices
Under our equity-based grant practices, we make regular equity-based grants to eligible employees, including our NEOs, in the first quarter of the calendar year at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee. Under our current practice, the exercise price, in the case of any stock options, is the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of the grant. We also may award equity-based grants during the year to newly hired executive officers as part of their compensation package or to executives based on a promotion during the year. In the case of equity-based grants to newly hired employees who may be officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, including NEOs, the grants are authorized by the Committee.
Mitigation of Potential Risk in Pay Programs
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation policies and practices and determined that there are no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Dana. To avoid excessive risk-taking behaviors, Dana has put in place several mechanisms, including, but not limited to:
Stock ownership guidelines;
Caps on annual incentive payouts;
Financial performance-based annual incentive program;
Long-term incentive awards that are delivered in the form of equity;
Mix of multiple types of awards and performance assessment periods;
Use of multiple metrics and performance periods to determine annual and long-term incentive payouts; and
Clawback and anti-hedging and pledging policies.
CEO Employment Agreement
As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kamsickas has an executive employment agreement with the Company. Terms of the employment agreement can be found in the “CEO Employment Agreement” section below. No other NEO has an employment agreement.
Severance Arrangements
We administer an executive severance plan (Executive Severance Plan) in which our current NEOs participate, except for Mr. Kamsickas, whose severance compensation, other than for a change in control, is governed by his employment agreement. We also provide a double-trigger change in control severance plan (Change in Control Severance Plan) in which all of our NEOs participate. The Change in Control Severance Plan provides severance benefits as a result of a qualifying termination of employment after a change in control. These arrangements provide certainty to both Dana and the former executive as to their rights and obligations to each other, including restrictive covenants and non-compete agreements.
Executive Severance Plan
The Executive Severance Plan provides severance compensation to eligible executives, including our NEOs whose employment is involuntarily terminated other than by reason of death, disability or cause prior to a change in control. Severance compensation for our Chairman and CEO is provided in his employment agreement.
Change in Control Severance Plan
The Change in Control Severance Plan provides severance benefits to eligible executives whose employment is involuntary terminated as a result of a change in control. Each of our current NEOs is eligible to participate in the plan. We believe that such a plan helps to both retain and attract executives by reducing the personal uncertainty that arises from the possibility of a future business combination or restructuring. Dana believes that the Change in Control Severance Plan helps to increase shareholder value by encouraging
20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

executives to consider change in control transactions that are in the best interest of Dana and its shareholders, even if the transaction may ultimately result in termination of their employment. The plan contains a double-trigger provision (i.e., termination of employment after a change in control) for the vesting of equity awards and for distributing severance payments in the event of any change in control. No excise tax gross-up is provided under this plan.
Additional information on the terms and conditions of these plans as they relate to our NEOs is described in the section entitled “Potential Payments and Benefits upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
Generally, Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million per year. Tax deductibility is only one of a number of factors the Compensation Committee may consider in evaluating the Company’s executive compensation program and its effectiveness in retaining, attracting, motivating and rewarding its senior leaders.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based payments under our equity-based plans in accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Further information about this accounting treatment can be found in Notes 1 and 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Dana’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Compensation Committee
Michael J. Mack, Jr., Chair
Ernesto M. Hernández
Brett M. Icahn
R. Bruce McDonald
February 14, 2023
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the compensation of our Chairman and CEO, Senior Vice President and CFO, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (collectively, the named executive officers) for services rendered during the years stated in all capacities to Dana and our subsidiaries.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
Principal Position(1)
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
James K. Kamsickas Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
2022
1,275,000
0
9,139,212
0
1,435,523
0
32,513
11,882,248
2021
1,237,500
0
8,478,178
0
467,188
0
433,137
10,616,003
2020
1,050,000
0
8,282,900
0
750,000
0
453,532
10,536,432
Timothy R. Kraus
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2022
600,000
0
1,621,879
0
331,020
0
61,301
2,614,200
2021
459,993
0
526,550
0
134,550
0
66,836
1,187,929
Aziz S. Aghili
Executive Vice President and President, Heavy Vehicle
2022
650,000
0
1,669,207
0
394,472
0
(502,049)
2,211,630
2021
635,000
0
1,866,082
0
155,480
0
39,788
2,696,350
2020
560,500
0
1,640,443
0
221,250
0
1,338,952
3,761,145
Byron S. Foster
Senior Vice President and President, Light Vehicle Drive Systems
2022
590,000
0
1,346,668
0
335,592
0
53,241
2,325,501
Douglas H. Liedberg
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Chief Compliance and Sustainability Officer
2022
572,500
0
1,328,095
0
335,514
0
46,359
2,282,468
2021
543,750
0
1,219,614
0
115,115
0
163,048
2,041,527
2020
498,750
0
1,203,447
0
170,625
0
139,084
2,011,906
Footnotes:
(1)
The latest position held by the named executive officer as of December 31, 2022.
(2)
With respect to the 2022, 2021 and 2020 grants, this column shows the grant date value of the PSAs and RSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Also included in this column are dividend equivalent units earned on RSUs in the applicable year which are subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying awards. For additional information regarding the assumptions used in determining fair value for share-based compensation, refer to Notes 1 and 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Dana’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. Refer to the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below for information on awards made in 2022. Refer to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table for the market value of awards not vested as of December 31, 2022. The values of the PSAs at the grant date if the highest level of performance conditions were to be achieved would be as follows: Mr. Kamsickas—$8,924,998; Mr. Kraus—$1,499,988; Mr. Aghili—$1,624,957; Mr. Liedberg—$1,144,989; Mr. Foster—$1,327,488.
(3)
Based upon the financial performance for the three-year period ending December 31, 2022, the PSAs that were granted in 2020 as part of the NEOs 2020 LTIP award resulted in an aggregate payout of 0% of target as summarized below:
Name
Total 2020 LTIP
Grant Value
Value of
RSUs
Value of PSAs
Value of Actual
Payout of PSAs
James K. Kamsickas
$7,050,548
$3,626,792
$3,423,756
$ 0
Timothy R. Kraus
$ 362,243
$ 186,293
$ 175,950
$ 0
Aziz S. Aghili
$1,397,182
$ 718,689
$ 678,493
$ 0
Douglas H. Liedberg
$1,081,041
$ 556,034
$ 525,006
$ 0
The 2020 LTIP was comprised of an award of 50% RSUs and 50% PSAs. PSAs were subject to the performance of two metrics, Adjusted EBITDA Margin and Adjusted Free Cash Flow. The payout of PSAs awarded in 2020 was 0% of target based on metric performance, further described in the 2020 LTIP performance section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”.
(4)
This column shows the cash incentive awards earned for performance under our 2022 AIP. For years 2021 and 2020, the amount shown reflects cash incentive awards pursuant to the annual incentive payable in the reported year.
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(5)
The total values shown for the individuals during 2022 include benefits set forth below.
a.
James K. Kamsickas: $22,875 for contributions to Dana Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)); $107,789 for credits to Dana Restoration Plan; $(114,436) representing the change in value of the supplemental executive retirement plan; $10,116 for life benefits (including AD&D and group variable universal life insurance); $550 for executive physical; and $5,619 for business-related spousal travel.
b.
Timothy R. Kraus: $22,875 for contributions to Dana Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)); $32,216 for credits to Dana Restoration Plan; $1,310 for life benefits (including AD&D and group variable universal life insurance); $3,575 for executive physical; and $1,325 for business-related spousal travel.
c.
Aziz S. Aghili: $22,875 for contributions to Dana Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)); $37,536 for credits to Dana Restoration Plan; $(98,704) representing the change in value of the supplemental executive retirement plan; $4,438 for life benefits (including AD&D and group variable universal life insurance); and $(468,195), for international assignment benefits, comprised primarily of assignment-related tax credits, and which includes tax gross-down payments totaling $(8,770) .
d.
Byron S. Foster: $22,875 for contributions to Dana Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)); $27,941 for credits to Dana Restoration Plan; $1,525 for life benefits (including AD&D and group variable universal life insurance; and $900 for business-related spousal travel.
e.
Douglas H. Liedberg: $22,875 for contributions to Dana Retirement Savings Plan (401(k)); $28,696 for credits to Dana Restoration Plan; $(6,948) representing the change in value of the supplemental executive retirement plan; and $1,736 for life benefits (including AD&D and group variable universal life insurance).
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table contains information on grants of awards to named executive officers in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 under the 2017 Dana Incorporated Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), the 2021 Dana Incorporated Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) and the 2022 Annual Operating Plan.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Name
Type of Award
Grant Date



Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
(3)
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or
Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
James K. Kamsickas
Performance Share Award
2/15/2022
49,760
199,041
398.082
4,462,499
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
212,094
4,676,713
Annual Incentive Plan
765,000
1,912,500
3,825,000
Timothy R. Kraus
Performance Share Award
2/15/2022
8,363
33,452
66,904
749,994
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
34,786
771,885
Restricted Stock Unit Award
12/1/2022
5,711
100,000
Annual Incentive Plan
180,000
450,000
900,000
Aziz S. Aghili
Performance Share Award
2/15/2022
9,060
36,239
72,478
812,478
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
38,937
856,728
Annual Incentive Plan
208,000
520,000
1,040,000
Byron S. Foster
Performance Share Award
2/15/2022
7,401
29,605
59,210
663,744
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
30,773
682,924
Annual Incentive Plan
177,000
442,500
885,000
Douglas H. Liedberg
Performance Share Award
2/15/2022
6,383
25,535
51,070
572,495
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
27,390
602,935
Restricted Stock Unit Award
2/15/2022
6,853
152,665
Annual Incentive Plan
171,750
429,375
858,750
Footnotes:
(1)
These columns reflect the potential payments for each of the named executive officers under our 2022 AIP. As discussed in the Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, the actual payout for the 2022 AIP was 66.7% of target based on 2022 performance against established metrics. Refer to the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” for individual payouts. Refer to the 2022 AIP portion of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above for additional information on such program, including the performance targets that correspond to the potential payments listed.
(2)
These columns reflect the potential issuance of shares for each of the NEOs under the PSA component of the 2022 LTIP. As discussed in the LTIP awards section of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” PSAs account for fifty percent (50%) of the 2022 LTIP and such awards cliff vest at the end of the three-year period based on performance against established metrics. Refer to the 2022 LTIP portion of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above for additional information on such program, including the performance targets that correspond to the potential payouts listed.
(3)
This amount represents the number of RSUs granted as a component of the 2022 LTIP and the dividend equivalent units granted in 2022. As discussed in the LTIP section of the CD&A, RSUs accounted for fifty percent (50%) of the 2022 LTIP. The RSUs ratably vest over the three (3) year period after the date of grant. As noted in the table, Messrs. Kraus and Liedberg each received an additional grant of RSUs in 2022, as described in the LTIP section of the CD&A.
(4)
This column represents the fair value (at grant date) of PSAs, RSUs and dividend equivalents granted to each of the NEOs in 2022. The value of the PSAs and RSUs is calculated using the closing stock price on the date of grant. The value of PSAs assumes a target level of performance. The value of the dividend equivalents is calculated using the closing stock price on the dividend payment date.
The following table provides information on stock options, PSAs and RSUs awarded under the 2012, 2017 and 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plans for each named executive officer that were outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
Each outstanding award is shown separately. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price of Dana common stock on December 30, 2022 of $15.13 per share.
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Name
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Exercise
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(7)
($)
James K. Kamsickas
203,935(1)
3,085,537
398,082(4)
6,022,981
105,449(2)
1,595,443
306,764(5)
4,641,339
234,592(3)
3,549,377
0(6)
0
Timothy R. Kraus
39,984(1)
604,958
66,904(4)
1,012,258
5,159(2)
78,056
15,018(5)
227,222
12,050(3)
182,317
0(6)
0
Aziz S. Aghili
37,129(1)
561,762
72,478(4)
1,096,592
25,056(2)
379,097
57,916(5)
876,269
45,017(3)
681,107
0(6)
0
Byron S. Foster
30,332(1)
458,923
59,210
895,847
13,831(2)
209,263
Douglas H. Liedberg
2,777
16.19
2/25/2023
33,014(1)
499,502
51,070(4)
772,689
15,404(2)
233,063
44,814(5)
678,036
35,966(3)
544,166
0(6)
0
Footnotes:
(1)
RSUs granted on February 15, 2022 vest ratably on the subsequent three (3) grant date anniversaries. Figures also include additional grants for Mr. Kraus (5,711 RSUs on December 1, 2022 with a one (1) year cliff vest) and Mr. Liedberg (6,853 RSUs on February 15, 2022 vesting ratably on the subsequent two (2) grant date anniversaries).
(2)
RSUs granted on February 9, 2021 vest ratably on the subsequent three (3) grant date anniversaries. The first tranche of this grant vested on February 9, 2022. Figures also include additional grants for Mr. Aghili (10,260 RSUs on November 1, 2021 vesting ratably on the subsequent two (2) grant date anniversaries) and Mr. Foster (7,717 RSUs on June 30, 2021 vesting ratably on the subsequent three (3) grant date anniversaries and 7,010 RSUs on December 14, 2021 vesting ratable on the subsequent two (2) grant date anniversaries).
(3)
RSUs granted on February 10, 2020 cliff vest on February 10, 2023.
(4)
PSAs granted on February 9, 2021 cliff vest after three-year performance period.
(5)
PSAs granted on February 10, 2020 cliff vest after three-year performance period.
(6)
This reflects the shares earned from the PSA component of the LTIP award issued on February 10, 2020 based on weighted performance results of 0%.
(7)
For the PSAs granted in 2022, the amounts in this column reflect the market value of 200% of the PSAs granted (i.e., maximum performance) based on the closing stock price of $15.13 on December 30, 2022. For the PSAs granted in 2021, the amounts in this column reflect the market value of 200% of the PSAs granted (i.e., maximum performance) based on the closing stock price of $15.13 on December 30, 2022. For the PSAs granted in 2020, the amounts in this column reflect actual aggregate performance based on achievement of 0% of the PSAs granted for the performance period ended December 31, 2022.
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table provides information concerning the vesting of PSAs and RSUs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, for each of the named executive officers.
Options Exercised and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized
on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
James K. Kamsickas
272,515
5,857,268
Timothy R. Kraus
19,940
410,327
Aziz S. Aghili
63,369
1,325,756
Byron S. Foster
8,648
149,651
Douglas H. Liedberg
36,064
776,351
Footnotes:
(1)
These values represent the vesting of RSUs and were determined by using the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on each vesting date.
The following table provides information on the nonqualified deferred compensation of the named executive officers with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation at Fiscal Year-End
Name
Dana
Credits in
2022
($)
Aggregate
Earnings in
2022
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
in 2022
($)
Aggregate
Balance on
12/31/2022
($)
James K. Kamsickas
215,282(1)
(379,704)(2)
311,925
3,193,956(3)
Timothy R. Kraus
32,216(1)
(79,664)
0
388,514
Aziz S. Aghili
87,234(1)
(266,763)
0
1,517,848
Byron S. Foster
27,941(1)
(481)
0
34,354
Douglas H. Liedberg
71,122(1)
(112,482)
0
691,742
Footnotes:
(1)
Includes credit for employer fixed and matching contributions that exceed the IRS limits for our qualified 401(k) plan and credit for the supplemental executive retirement plan described below. This credit is also reflected in Footnote 5 of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.
Restoration Plan Company Credits
($ value)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Company Credits ($ value)
James K. Kamsickas
107,789
James K. Kamsickas
107,493
Timothy R. Kraus
32,216
Timothy R. Kraus
0
Aziz S. Aghili
37,536
Aziz S. Aghili
49,698
Byron S. Foster
27,941
Byron S. Foster
0
Douglas H. Liedberg
28,696
Douglas H. Liedberg
42,426
(2)
Includes earnings on employee deferrals in the deferred compensation plan.
(3)
Includes deferred compensation plan balance.
Retirement Plans
Dana maintains a non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan for certain executives, including the named executive officers. Under the terms of the supplemental executive retirement plan, Dana established unfunded notional defined contribution accounts subject to the claims of Dana’s general creditors. Each participant account is credited on an annual basis as follows: (a) fixed employer credits – equal to 3.5% of compensation; and (b) discretionary employer credits based on the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee and Company performance not to exceed 4% of compensation. The earnings rate for each participant is based on the rates of return (positive or negative) earned by the measurement funds selected by the participant as offered for the purposes of the plan. Participants are fully vested after five (5) years of service or upon death, disability or Change in Control.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dana also maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows certain executives to defer base pay and/or incentive pay into unfunded notional accounts subject to the claims of Dana’s general creditors.
CEO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Mr. Kamsickas became President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Dana effective August 11, 2015. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Kamsickas is entitled to the following:
Annual base salary;
Upon the achievement of target-level performance, an annual bonus;
Annual grants pursuant to the long-term incentive program under Dana’s 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and