☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
☑ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
FROM OUR BOARD
Dear Shareholders:
On behalf of our Board of Directors, we are pleased to invite you to Greenbrier’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
During fiscal 2023, under the leadership of CEO and President Lorie Tekorius, we advanced the operating initiatives announced at the inaugural Greenbrier Investor Day in April, strategically positioning us for further growth and solidifying our position as an established industry leader. Our strong performance in fiscal 2023 demonstrates the success of our executive transitions undertaken in fiscal 2022, and well positions our Company for the future. As a continuation of this transition, and as part of our ongoing commitment to Board refreshment, William “Bill” Furman and Charles “Butch” Swindells will conclude their Board service and not stand for re-election at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We sincerely thank Bill and Butch for their service to Greenbrier. Bill co-founded Greenbrier in 1981, and during his tenure as CEO, Greenbrier became a multi-billion-dollar global operation with a consistent history of delivering shareholder value. We continue to build on the legacy that Bill created.
We value feedback from our shareholders. Our commitment to good governance, driving growth, shareholder value, succession planning, and Board refreshment is informed by engagement with our shareholders. We also recognize our broader obligation to consider the interests of stakeholders, from customers to employees to our communities, in how we operate our business and execute on our strategy. We have engaged in many discussions with stakeholders to inform our priorities. We are confident in our ability to drive growth and increase shareholder returns while being a positive force in corporate governance, environmental sustainability, and social responsibility.
Along with the Board of Directors, our leadership team and more than 13,800 employees, we thank you for your continued support and investment. We look forward to your participation at the Annual Meeting on January 5, 2024.
The leadership provided by our Board, along with Greenbrier’s experienced management team promotes the highest standards of corporate governance, shareholder |
||||
ADMIRAL THOMAS B. FARGO Board Chair |
LORIE L. TEKORIUS CEO and President |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
2024 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
|
|
|
| |||
Meeting Date: Friday, |
Meeting Access: www.virtualshareholder meeting.com/GBX2024 |
Meeting Time: 12:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) |
Record Date: |
PROXY VOTING
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, please promptly vote by telephone or over the internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or voting instruction form so that your shares will be represented at the Annual Meeting.
|
ONLINE |
![]() |
BY PHONE |
![]() |
BY MAIL |
Our Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/393657
Our Board has determined and authorized that the Annual Meeting be conducted virtually solely by remote communication beginning at 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on January 5, 2024, via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GBX2024. You may notify the Company of your desire to participate in the Annual Meeting by logging into the online site in advance. Please see “Annual Meeting Information” on page 60 of this Proxy Statement for details on how to access and participate in our virtual Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting is being held for the purpose of voting on the items set forth below and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
ITEMS TO BE VOTED ON
Proposal 1 | — | Election of Directors | Page 23 | |||
Proposal 2 | — | Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation | Page 48 | |||
Proposal 3 | — | Advisory Approval of Frequency of Executive Compensation Vote | Page 49 | |||
Proposal 4 | — | Approve an Amendment and Restatement of the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended | Page 50 | |||
Proposal 5 | — | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors | Page 58 |
As of the date of this Notice, the Company has not received notice of any matters, other than those set forth above, that may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the meeting, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card, or their duly constituted substitutes, are authorized to vote the shares represented by proxy or otherwise act on those matters in accordance with their judgment.
Holders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on November 2, 2023, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Christian M. Lucky
General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider. Please read this entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. This Proxy Statement is first being released to shareholders on November 13, 2023.
PROPOSAL 1
Election of Directors
![]() |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” all director nominees, as they have determined that each of the nominees possesses the right experience and qualifications to effectively oversee Greenbrier’s business strategy and risk management. All three of the nominees below are Class III directors nominated for a three-year term, while one nominee, Mr. Ottensmeyer, was appointed as a Class II director in June 2023 and is standing for election as a Class III director in order that the classes remain as nearly equal in number as possible with two Class III directors, Bill Furman and Butch Swindells, concluding their Board service and not standing for re-election.
See “Proposal 1, Election of Directors” on page 23 of this Proxy Statement. |
Director Nominees
The following table summarizes the qualifications of the director nominees.
|
PATRICK J. OTTENSMEYER Mr. Ottensmeyer joined the Greenbrier Board in June 2023. Mr. Ottensmeyer is a rail industry leader, serving as President and CEO of Kansas City Southern (KCS), a Class I railroad, from 2015 until the completion of the merger creating Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) in 2023. Mr. Ottensmeyer brings expertise in business strategy, the rail industry and financial matters to the Board. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Mr. Ottensmeyer. | |
|
LORIE L. TEKORIUS Ms. Tekorius joined the Greenbrier Board in March 2022. Ms. Tekorius was appointed as Greenbrier’s CEO in March 2022 and is a 25+ year employee of the Company. She provides significant company-specific and industry knowledge, in addition to organizational leadership and financial and operational expertise. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Ms. Tekorius. | |
|
KELLY M. WILLIAMS Ms. Williams joined the Greenbrier Board in March 2015. Ms. Williams is a recognized industry leader, including repeatedly having been named one of The Most Powerful Women in Finance by American Banker magazine. Ms. Williams brings executive management and financial and investment expertise to the Board. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Ms. Williams. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
1
PROXY SUMMARY
DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a variety of factors, including professional experience, demonstrated skills, and diversity of background in evaluating candidates for membership on the Board. As demonstrated in the below matrix, which reflects certain categories of experience and expertise represented by the directors serving on the Board after the 2024 Annual Meeting, Greenbrier’s directors provide a diverse mix of skills, knowledge, attributes, and experiences that cover the spectrum of areas that affect the Company’s business and its stakeholders.
(Summary | of our nine-person Board as of January 2024. See “Corporate Governance—Board Experience” for more detail.) |
Our Board believes that shareholder interests are best represented by directors with the right mix of skills, experience, and expertise to actively oversee strategy, risk management, and governance at Greenbrier. An independent, engaged, and diverse Board enhances representation of shareholder and stakeholder interests and promotes thoughtful and effective Board deliberation. Our Board is focused on the independent oversight of Greenbrier, Board refreshment, and high governance standards through a variety of policies and practices, including an independent Chair of the Board, regular executive sessions of independent directors at Board and committee meetings, continuous Board refreshment, substantial director stock ownership guidelines, director engagement with shareholders and stakeholders, continuing education, consultations with highly-qualified independent external advisors, and annual evaluations of the Board, its committees and each director.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
2
PROXY SUMMARY
In addition, the composition of the Board reflects its commitment to Board refreshment, independence, and diversity:
• | Two of our current directors, Bill Furman and Butch Swindells, will conclude their Board service at the Annual Meeting with over 65% of remaining directors having joined the Board since 2017. |
• | After the Annual Meeting, eight of the nine directors of the Board will be independent, and all eight such independent directors will meet the heightened standard of independence established by the Board as described in “Board Independence” on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. |
• | If the nominated candidates are elected at the Annual Meeting, the number of women on our Board will increase from 30% in 2017 to 44% after the Annual Meeting, and one-third of our directors will be individuals who identify as racially or ethnically diverse. |
See “Corporate Governance” on page 6 of this Proxy Statement for more information about our governance profile, achievements and initiatives.
PROPOSAL 2
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
![]() |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL
Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2023.
See “Proposal 2, Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation” on page 48 of this Proxy Statement. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
3
PROXY SUMMARY
Executive Compensation Highlights
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain the key executives who drive our success. Pay that reflects performance and aligns with the interests of shareholders is key to our compensation philosophy. A key objective of that philosophy is to link a significant portion of the compensation of our executive officers to achievement of pre-established financial and strategic goals that are directly tied to our overall business strategy. In fiscal 2023, over 60% of the compensation of each of our “named executive officers” or “NEOs” (discussed later in this proxy statement) was conditioned on the achievement of pre-established financial and strategic goals, using grant date accounting fair values for fiscal 2023 equity awards and annual bonuses actually earned.
We believe our performance in fiscal 2023 is a testament to the strength and effectiveness of our compensation philosophy. As described later in this proxy statement, in fiscal 2023 we achieved record annual revenues of $3.9 billion, an increase of $966.3 million or 32.5% compared to fiscal 2022, and record deliveries, with railcar deliveries increasing 33.2% compared to fiscal 2022.
Listed below are highlights of our fiscal 2023 executive compensation policies and practices:
WHAT WE DO | ||
✔ | Ongoing engagement with our institutional shareholders regarding our executive compensation policies and practices | |
✔ | Performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Caps on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Significant portion of executive compensation at risk based on company performance | |
✔ | Multi-year equity award vesting periods for equity awards, including three-year performance periods for performance-based equity awards | |
✔ | One-year minimum vesting requirement under equity incentive plan, with limited exceptions | |
✔ | Annual review and approval of our executive compensation program | |
✔ | Annual compensation risk assessment | |
✔ | Annual “Say On Pay” vote | |
✔ | Clawback policy on cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Robust stock ownership and stock retention guidelines for executive officers | |
✔ | No employment agreements with executive officers | |
✔ | Independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee | |
✔ | 100% independent directors on the Compensation Committee | |
✔ | Limited perquisites
|
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
4
PROXY SUMMARY
WHAT WE DON’T DO | ||
× | No “single trigger” change of control payments and benefits | |
× | No tax gross-ups, including for change of control related excise tax payments | |
× | No short sales, hedging, pledging of stock ownership positions, or transactions involving derivatives of our common stock | |
× | No strict benchmarking of executive compensation to a specific percentile of our compensation peer group | |
× | No pension benefits | |
× | No dividend payments on unvested awards | |
× | No ‘repricing’ of out-of-the-money stock options without shareholder approval | |
× | No incentivizing unnecessary or excessive risk taking |
PROPOSAL 3
Advisory Approval of Frequency of Executive Compensation Vote
![]() |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE OF EVERY “1 YEAR” FOR THIS PROPOSAL
Our Board recommends that shareholders vote every “1 YEAR” as the frequency of holding a vote on the advisory approval of our executive compensation.
See “Proposal 3, Advisory Approval of Frequency of Executive Compensation Vote” on page 49 of this Proxy Statement. |
PROPOSAL 4
Approve an Amendment and Restatement of the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended
![]() |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL
Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” approval of an amendment and restatement of our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended.
See “Proposal 4, Approve an Amendment and Restatement of the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, As Amended” on page 50 of this Proxy Statement. |
PROPOSAL 5
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors
![]() |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL
Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as auditors for fiscal 2024.
See “Proposal 5, Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors” on page 58 of this Proxy Statement. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
5
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board Composition
Our Board of Directors is currently composed of 11 directors. Nine directors are independent and 10 directors are not employed by Greenbrier. Each of our directors serves for a three year term, as follows:
• | Thomas Fargo, Antonio Garza, and James Huffines currently serve as Class I directors, with terms expiring at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2025; |
• | Wanda Felton, Graeme Jack, Patrick Ottensmeyer, and Wendy Teramoto currently serve as Class II directors, with terms expiring at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2026; and |
• | Lorie Tekorius, Bill Furman, Butch Swindells, and Kelly Williams currently serve as Class III directors, with terms expiring at this Annual Meeting. |
Bill Furman and Butch Swindells are not standing for re-election at this Annual Meeting. The Board sincerely thanks Mr. Furman and Ambassador Swindells for their many years of service to the Company.
Patrick Ottensmeyer was appointed as a Class II director by the Board in June 2023. Under Greenbrier’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, directors appointed by the Board stand for election at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As a result, Mr. Ottensmeyer is standing for election at this Annual Meeting. Due to the planned departures of Mr. Furman and Ambassador Swindells from the Board at the Annual Meeting (each a Class III director), Mr. Ottensmeyer is standing for election as a Class III director in order that the classes remain as nearly equal in number as possible.
In the following pages, we highlight key areas of experience that qualify each director to serve on the Board. The Board has determined it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for each of the directors to continue serving on the Board.
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
![]() |
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer (Director) | |||
Age: 66 Director Since: 2023
|
Current Term Expiration: 2026 |
Experience
Mr. Ottensmeyer has served as a member of the Board since June 2023. Prior to his service on the board, he was President and CEO of Kansas City Southern (KCS), a Class I railroad, from 2015 to 2023 until the completion of the merger creating Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC). For more than a decade, Mr. Ottensmeyer held various senior executive positions at KCS, including: President of KCS from March 2015 through April 2023; Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing of KCS from October 2008 through March 2015; Chief Executive Officer of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCSR), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KCS, from July 2016 through April 2023; and President of KCSR from March 2015 through April 2023. He also has a very extensive understanding of financial matters, which helped him lead KCS’s finance department during his time as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Ottensmeyer is a rail industry leader, with experience as U.S. Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s U.S.-Mexico Economic Council (USMXECO), Co-Chair of the Brookings Institute USMCA Initiative, and Chair of the Truman Library Institute. He received the NARS Edward R. Hamberger Lifetime Achievement Award (2023), Ingram’s Executive of the Year Award (2022), Railway Age’s Co-Railroaders of the Year Award (2022), Railway Age Railroader of the Year (2020), and Progressive Railroading’s Railroad Innovator Award (2019). He is also a member of the Board of Watco LLC. He received his Bachelors in Science in Finance from Indiana University in 1979.
Qualifications
Mr. Ottensmeyer brings expertise in business strategy, the rail industry and financial matters to the Board. Additionally, Mr. Ottensmeyer is an “audit committee financial expert” under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
![]() |
Lorie L. Tekorius (Director and Chief Executive Officer) | |||
Age: 56 Director Since: 2022
|
Current Term Expiration: 2024 |
Experience
In March 2022, Ms. Tekorius became Greenbrier’s Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior to this, she was Greenbrier’s President and Chief Operating Officer, leading strategic planning, maintenance services, management services and the accounting, finance, human resources, and other corporate functions. Ms. Tekorius joined Greenbrier in 1995 and since that time has served Greenbrier in a broad range of financial and operating roles. In 2016, she was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, a role which gained her recognition as Oregon’s 2017 CFO of the Year by the Portland Business Journal. In 2018, Ms. Tekorius was recognized as one of 14 “Women in Rail” by Railway Age in recognition of her contributions to the industry. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the Alamo Group, Inc. and sits on its Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Ms. Tekorius is an active community member, serving as Past President of the Providence St. Vincent Medical Foundation Council of Trustees.
Qualifications
As a 25+ year employee of Greenbrier, Ms. Tekorius provides significant company-specific and industry knowledge, in addition to organizational leadership and financial and operational expertise.
![]() |
Kelly M. Williams (Director and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) | |||
Age: 59 Director Since: 2015
|
Current Term Expiration: 2024 |
Experience
Ms. Williams has served as a member of the Board since 2015. Ms. Williams is the CEO of the Williams Legacy Foundation and is on the Board of Directors of KKR Private Equity Conglomerate LLC. Ms. Williams was a senior advisor of GCM Grosvenor Private Markets from June 2015 until January of 2019. Until June 1, 2015, Ms. Williams was President of GCM Grosvenor Private Markets, a member of its Management Committee and a member of its Investment Committee. Prior to joining GCM Grosvenor, Ms. Williams was a Managing Director, the Group Head and the chair of the compensation committee of the Customized Fund Investment Group of Credit Suisse Group AG from 2000 through 2014, after Credit Suisse acquired Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette, where Ms. Williams was director of the Customized Fund Investment Group. She was with the Prudential Insurance Company of America from 1993 to 2000, where she was an Executive Director and a founder of the Customized Fund Investment Group in 1999. Prior to joining Prudential, Ms. Williams was an attorney at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, where she specialized in global project finance. She graduated magna cum laude from Union College in 1986 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and Mathematics and received her Juris Doctor from New York University School of Law in 1989. Ms. Williams serves in leadership positions on the boards of several for profit and not-for profits and has won numerous awards for leadership and public service. In addition, Ms. Williams was named as one of the Most Powerful Women in Finance by American Banker Magazine from 2011-2014. Ms. Williams also serves as President of the Nantucket Historical Association, and as a board member of Union College.
Qualifications
Ms. Williams brings executive management and financial and investment expertise to the Board.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
7
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
![]() |
Thomas B. Fargo (Chair of the Board and Chair of the Compensation Committee) | |||
Age: 75 Director Since: 2015
|
Current Term Expiration: 2025 |
Experience
Admiral Fargo has served as a member of the Board since 2015. He was Lead Director from January 2021 through August 2022. In September 2022, Admiral Fargo was elected Chair of the Board of Directors upon Mr. Furman’s retirement from executive offices. He is a retired military commander with subsequent private sector experience in maritime and other transportation industries. As commander of the U.S. Pacific Command from 2002 until 2005, Admiral Fargo led the world’s largest unified command while directing the joint operations of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force in the Asia-Pacific Theater. He serves as the Board Chair of Hawaiian Electric Industries and is on the Board of Directors of Matson, Inc. Previously, Admiral Fargo served as the Board Chair of USAA and Huntington Ingalls Industries and served on the Boards of Northrop Grumman Corporation, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. and Hawaiian Airlines.
Qualifications
Admiral Fargo brings executive leadership and operational, manufacturing and international expertise to the Board.
![]() |
Wanda F. Felton (Director) | |||
Age: 65 Director Since: 2017
|
Current Term Expiration: 2026 |
Experience
Ms. Felton has served as a member of the Board since 2017. Ms. Felton has over 30 years of financial industry experience in commercial and investment banking. Ms. Felton was a Presidential Appointee and was confirmed twice by the U.S. Senate to serve on the board of the Export Import Bank of the United States as Vice Chair of the Board and First Vice President from June 2011 to November 2016. In that role, she was on the team of economic deputies that advised the National Security Staff and the President’s Export Council on trade and investment. Ms. Felton was actively engaged in helping U.S. companies penetrate international markets and develop pragmatic financing solutions to win sales. Ms. Felton had oversight responsibility for the Office of the Chief Financial Officer and enterprise risk management functions, and served on the bank’s credit committee, which was responsible for approving debt financings over $10 million for a broad range of financing types across a range of industries. A significant portion of such financings supported the export of U.S.-manufactured transportation equipment, including rail equipment and aircraft, to emerging markets. She was also an ex officio member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee. Until recently, Ms. Felton was a Senior Advisor to Spencer Stuart’s North American Board Practice focused on diversity. In September 2021, she joined Demopolis Equity Partners, a private equity fund that will invest in technology-enabled businesses (primarily fintech and e-commerce). She continues to serve as a Trustee of The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
Qualifications
Ms. Felton brings her significant prior experience with emerging markets business development and capital raising to the Board. Additionally, Ms. Felton is an “audit committee financial expert” under NYSE and SEC rules.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
8
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
![]() |
Antonio O. Garza (Director) | |||
Age: 64 Director Since: 2021
|
Current Term Expiration: 2025 |
Experience
Ambassador Garza has served as a member of the Board since 2021. He is Counsel in the Mexico City office of White & Case LLP, a global law firm. Prior to joining White & Case, Ambassador Garza served as the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico from 2002 to 2009. He has been a director of Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited (CPCK), a Class 1 railroad, since 2023, and served as a director of Kansas City Southern, a Class 1 railroad, from 2010 until the completion of the merger creating CPKC in April 2023. Ambassador Garza also served on the Board of MoneyGram International, Inc. from 2012 through 2023, and on the Board of Americas Technology Acquisition Corp from 2021 to 2022. He was Chairman of the Railroad Commission of Texas, elected to that statewide office in 1998, and served through 2002. Ambassador Garza is a member of the Board of Trustees of Southern Methodist University. He also is a director of the Americas Society, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Mexico and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and COMEXI, the CFR’s Mexican counterpart. From 1994 through 1997, he was the State of Texas Secretary of State, and Senior Policy Advisor to the Governor of Texas. He is a member of the State Bar of Texas, the District of Columbia Bar and is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court. Ambassador Garza is a past recipient of the Aguila Azteca (Aztec Eagle), the highest honor bestowed by the Mexican government on a foreign national.
Qualifications
Ambassador Garza brings international expertise and rail industry, legal and governmental experience to the Board.
![]() |
James R. Huffines (Director) | |||
Age: 72 Director Since: 2021
|
Current Term Expiration: 2025 |
Experience
Mr. Huffines has served as a member of the Board since 2021. Mr. Huffines has over 35 years of experience in banking and finance. He most recently served as Chief Operating Officer for subsidiaries of Hilltop Holdings, Inc., an NYSE publicly-traded financial company, and on the Board from 2012 to 2017. From 2007 to 2012, Mr. Huffines also served on the Board of Energy Future Holdings as an independent director and as the Board’s Audit Committee Chairman. Mr. Huffines presided as Chairman on the University of Texas System board of regents for four years during his seven years as a Regent. He also was on the Board and Audit Chair of the UTIMCO, a $35 billion endowment fund for higher education in Texas. Mr. Huffines currently serves on the holding company board of Susser Bank Holdings, a $1.9 billion privately owned financial institution.
Qualifications
Mr. Huffines brings banking and finance expertise, public company and governmental experience to the Board. Under NYSE and SEC rules, Mr. Huffines is an “audit committee financial expert.”
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
9
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
![]() |
Graeme A. Jack (Director and Chair of the Audit Committee) | |||
Age: 72 Director Since: 2006
|
Current Term Expiration: 2026 |
Experience
Mr. Jack has served as a member of the Board since 2006. He is a retired partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Hong Kong. He also serves, since 2017, as an independent non-executive director of HUTCHMED (China) Limited. Mr. Jack was an independent non-executive director of Hutchison Port Holdings Management Pte. Limited, the trustee manager of Hutchison Port Holdings Trust from 2011 until April 2023, and COSCO SHIPPING Development Company Limited from 2015 to 2021.
Qualifications
Mr. Jack brings accounting and financial reporting expertise to the Board as well as extensive experience in international business transactions in Asia generally, and in China in particular. Under NYSE and SEC rules, Mr. Jack is an “audit committee financial expert.”
![]() |
Wendy L. Teramoto (Director) | |||
Age: 49 Director Since: 2019
|
Current Term Expiration: 2026 |
Experience
Ms. Teramoto has served as a member of the Board since 2019. She has been a senior investment management professional with an affiliate of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited since 2018. From 2017 to 2018, she served in a senior capacity at the United States Department of Commerce. Until 2017, Ms. Teramoto was a Managing Director and a senior investment management professional, and a founding partner, at a New York-based private equity firm affiliated with Invesco Ltd. Ms. Teramoto has served as a board member for several companies in the transportation sector. In addition to serving on many private boards, Ms. Teramoto previously served on the Greenbrier Board from 2009 to 2017, and on the board for Navigator Holdings Ltd. from 2014 to 2017.
Qualifications
Ms. Teramoto brings investment management and financial expertise, and experience with manufacturing and other heavy industry companies to the Board. Additionally, Ms. Teramoto is an “audit committee financial expert” under NYSE and SEC rules.
Thank You!
The Board of Directors would like to thank Mr. Furman and Ambassador Swindells for their service to Greenbrier and its stakeholders.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
10
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Governance Highlights
Independent Oversight |
• 9 of the 11 members (over 80%) of our Board meet the independence criteria established by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Lorie L. Tekorius (our CEO) and Bill Furman (co-founder and former Executive Chair) are the only non-independent members of the Board. Bill Furman and Butch Swindells are not standing for re-election, and therefore after the Annual Meeting, 8 of 9 members (nearly 90%) will be independent | |
• The Chair of the Board, Thomas Fargo, is an independent director | ||
• 8 of the 9 independent directors of the Board, including all committee members, committee chairs, and the Board Chair, meet the heightened standard of independence described below in “Board Independence.” Butch Swindells is not standing for re-election, and therefore after the Annual Meeting, all 8 independent directors of the Board will meet such heightened standard of independence | ||
• Our independent directors regularly hold separate executive sessions at Board meetings and at committee meetings | ||
• The Board undertakes regular review of independent directors’ committee roles | ||
• The Board actively oversees strategy, risk management, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and human capital management including our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity, access and leadership (IDEAL) | ||
Board Refreshment |
• 6 of our current directors have joined the Board since 2017. Two of our current directors, Bill Furman and Butch Swindells, are not standing for re-election and as a result, after the Annual Meeting, more than 65% of the Board will have been refreshed since 2017 | |
• Average tenure of the Board, excluding the co-founder Mr. Furman and Ambassador Swindells is 5 years | ||
• The Board promotes refreshment through a policy that a director will not be nominated for election if such director’s age would be greater than 77 at the time of election | ||
• The Board promotes ongoing director education, including through our membership in the National Association of Corporate Directors | ||
• The Company received a “3+” rating (one of their highest ratings) from the 50/50 Women on Boards organization for having three or more female directors | ||
• Board succession planning is an ongoing process with a focus on integrity, experience, diversity and mix of tenure of directors | ||
• The Board regularly engages in identifying highly qualified candidates for future Board service | ||
High Governance Standards |
• Demonstrated commitment to shareholder and stakeholder engagement, including through year-round shareholder outreach | |
• Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all directors, officers, employees, and consultants | ||
• Average attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings exceeded 95% over the last 5 years | ||
• The Company maintains substantial director and officer stock ownership requirements | ||
• The Board reviews each director’s independence qualifications annually | ||
• Pledging or hedging of Company stock by directors and executives is prohibited | ||
Recent Accomplishments |
• Successful execution of planned Board refreshment and CEO succession, positioning Bill Furman and Butch Swindells to conclude Board service | |
• Effective response to unplanned Board vacancy on the untimely passing of David Starling with the appointment of Patrick Ottensmeyer | ||
• Regular review and implementation of the Company’s succession planning process for key leadership and operational positions, resulting in our recently executed multi-year succession plan | ||
• Publication of the Company’s fifth annual ESG Report, demonstrating advancement toward specific goals and continued progress on enhancing ESG reporting metrics using established reporting frameworks(1) | ||
• Increased gender diversity on our Board from 30% in 2017 to 44% after the Annual Meeting, with one third of the Board self-identifying as racially or ethnically diversity after the Annual Meeting | ||
(1) | For additional information, please see Greenbrier’s ESG Report, which can be found at www.gbrx.com/ESG. The information found on our website or in our 2023 ESG Report is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this Proxy Statement or any other report or document we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Independence
The Board makes all determinations with respect to director independence in accordance with NYSE and SEC requirements. In addition, the Board established enhanced guidelines to assist in making determinations regarding director independence (the “Independence Guidelines”), which are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and are available on the Company’s website at https://investors.gbrx.com/corporate-governance. Among other things, this heightened standard prohibits directors from serving on a committee if they receive any compensation from the Company in addition to their compensation for Board service. All of our directors who serve on Committees satisfy this heightened standard of independence, which further safeguards our Board’s autonomy and alignment with shareholders.
Based on its annual assessment of director independence, the Board has determined affirmatively that 9 of its 11 directors meet the independence criteria established by NYSE and SEC rules as set forth in the table on page 16. In arriving at this determination, the Board thoroughly considered the Company’s consulting arrangement with Ambassador Swindells, pursuant to which he provides consulting services to the Company on international projects under an agreement with the Company entered into in January 2016, and confirmed his independence and ability to exercise independent judgment. The Board also thoroughly considered an advisory arrangement between Mr. Ottensmeyer and CPKC, a company that has ordinary course commercial dealings with the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Ottensmeyer will serve as an advisor to CPKC through the remainder of calendar year 2023, and confirmed his independence and ability to exercise independent judgment. Due to the Board’s voluntary application of the heightened independence standard described above, Ambassador Swindells does not serve on any Board committees.
In fiscal 2023, the independent directors met without Company management present at all regular meetings of the Board.
Board Leadership
The Board has adopted a policy of only independent directors being eligible for the role of Chair of the Board. Admiral Thomas Fargo has served as independent Chair of the Board since September 1, 2022.
The independent Chair of the Board serves stakeholder interests by:
• | Presiding at all meetings of the Board |
• | Providing stability and leadership during the Company’s recently completed CEO transition |
• | Leading regular executive sessions of the independent directors, which are held at every regularly scheduled Board meeting |
• | Approving Board schedules, meeting agendas and other Board matters |
• | Making requests of the CEO and providing feedback regarding the Board’s requirements and observations |
• | Consulting with the CEO on Company strategy and providing advice and feedback |
• | With the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, implementing and participating in the Board self-evaluations process |
• | Acting as a liaison between the independent directors and the CEO and generally representing the independent directors on the Board |
• | Engaging with shareholders and supporting committee chairs in engagements as appropriate |
Annual Evaluations
Our Board, through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducts an annual evaluation of itself, its committees, and each director, individually, to ensure effective functioning. In addition:
• | The Chair of the Board and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet individually with each director to discuss goals, solicit feedback, gather views regarding Board composition, and address other important matters |
• | The Chair of the Board works with each committee chair to assess development opportunities and implement changes based on feedback received in the annual evaluations |
• | The Board receives regular anti-bribery and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act training |
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
12
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Refreshment
Our Board best serves the Company and its stakeholders when there is a balance between new directors with fresh perspectives and longer serving directors who bring continuity in a cyclical business.
To promote thoughtful Board refreshment, we have:
Appointed six of our current directors since 2017, to enhance diversity of experience, supplement the Board’s existing skills, prepare for future retirements, and respond to unexpected departures |
|
|
|
Adopted a retirement policy, whereby a director will not be nominated for election if such director’s age would be greater than 77 at the time of election |
|
|
|
Continued refreshment with the appointment of Patrick Ottensmeyer in June 2023 and the departure of Bill Furman and Butch Swindells from the Board in January 2024 |
The size of the Board is currently 11 directors. In accordance with our governing documents and in connection with our Board refreshment process, the size of the Board will periodically fluctuate as new directors are appointed to overlap with directors who are not standing for election, allowing for a robust onboarding process. Bill Furman and Butch Swindells are not standing for re-election at this Annual Meeting, and as a result, the size of the Board will be 9 directors as of January 2024.
Following are key metrics reflecting the balance of skills, qualifications and experience on our Board (as it will be constituted following the Annual Meeting in January 2024).
To ensure the Board operates at the highest level, Greenbrier supports continuing education programs and performs annual evaluations, in addition to maintaining a comprehensive orientation program for all new directors. These programs, including a membership with the National Association of Corporate Directors, contribute to increased levels of Board skills and knowledge as well as a current understanding of the landscape of risks and opportunities, best practices, and current governance trends. The Company is continually seeking to improve Board performance, including through additional training, if needed, when a director assumes a new leadership role. The Company pays the reasonable expenses of directors who attend continuing education programs.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
13
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Experience
Experience Contributions (For the Board as of Jan. 2024) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||
|
CEO/PRESIDENT |
l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||||||
|
DIVERSITY INITIATIVES |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||
|
FINANCIAL EXPERTISE |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | |||||||||||||
|
GOVERNMENT/MILITARY |
l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||||||
|
INTERNATIONAL |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | |||||||||||||
![]() |
LEGAL TRAINING |
l | l | |||||||||||||||||||
|
PUBLIC COMPANY |
l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||||||
|
PUBLIC POLICY |
l | l | l | l | l | l | |||||||||||||||
|
RAIL/TRANSPORT/INDUSTRIAL |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||||
|
RISK MANAGEMENT |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||
|
TALENT DEVELOPMENT |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | l | ||||||||||||
|
SUSTAINABILITY |
l | l | l | l | l | l | l |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a variety of factors including professional experience and demonstrated skills, diversity of gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, as well as cultural and geographical background in evaluating candidates for membership on the Board. The Committee believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a diverse mix of skills, knowledge, attributes, and experiences that cover the spectrum of areas that affect the Company’s business and its stakeholders. In general, the composition of the Board is diversified across financial, operational, accounting, legal, and corporate governance expertise, as well as expertise within the Company’s business and industry, including experience in global markets, public policy, manufacturing, finance, and rail. All candidates for director nominees, including self-nominated candidates, shareholder suggested candidates, and board-identified candidates, are thoroughly evaluated and considered in the context of current perceived needs of the Board as a whole. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly assesses whether the mix of skills, experience, and background of our Board is appropriate for the Company, including the Chair of the Board and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee soliciting feedback from each director individually regarding areas of strength and opportunities to supplement the Board’s existing skills and experience.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Committees, Meetings, and Charters
Below is a general overview of the role of each committee.
Compensation Committee |
Audit Committee |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||||||
The Compensation Committee focuses on increasing shareholder value by setting compensation for senior management and is responsible for:
1) Oversight of compensation program and incentive plans design, metrics and targets for Company executives
2) Oversight of executive officer compensation, evaluating CEO performance and recommending CEO compensation to the Board
3) Reviewing policies relating to director compensation and stock ownership guidelines
4) Assessing the independence of any compensation consultants
5) Engaging with shareholders to solicit feedback and understand compensation priorities |
The Audit Committee safeguards our shareholders’ investment in the Company by overseeing:
1) The integrity and public reporting of the Company’s financial statements
2) Company compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
3) Performance of the Company’s internal audit plan and functions and internal controls
4) Engagement and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
5) Cybersecurity, including information technology resilience and data security
6) Identification and evaluation of any related party transactions |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee works to ensure that stakeholders are effectively represented by overseeing:
1) Board refreshment, including the identification of director nominees
2) The process and protocols regarding CEO succession
3) The structure and composition of Board committees
4) Annual evaluations of the Board, its committees and each director, individually
5) Risk monitoring, except matters specifically reserved to another committee
6) The Company’s Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Access and Leadership (IDEAL) program
7) Environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters and reporting
8) Shareholder engagement to solicit feedback and understand governance priorities
9) Human capital management
|
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
15
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
During fiscal 2023, the Board at large held six meetings, the Audit Committee held four meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings, and the Compensation Committee held five meetings. Each of our current directors attended 75% or more of the total Board and Board committee meetings on which the director served in fiscal year 2023. All directors are invited and encouraged to attend all committee meetings. The independent directors met regularly in executive sessions without Company management present throughout fiscal 2023. The Chair of the Board conducts and presides at each executive session. The Company’s policy is to encourage Board members to attend the Company’s Annual Meetings of Shareholders. All of the Company’s then-serving directors attended the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on January 6, 2023. The composition of each of the Board committees as of the date of this Proxy Statement is set out below.
Name |
Independent | Audit Committee | Compensation Committee |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||||
Thomas B. Fargo (Board Chair) |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Wanda F. Felton |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | ||||
William A. Furman (former CEO and former Executive Chairman) (Retiring Jan. 2024) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Antonio O. Garza |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | ||||
James R. Huffines |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||
Graeme A. Jack |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||
Charles J. Swindells (Retiring Jan. 2024) |
![]() |
|
|
| ||||
Lorie L. Tekorius (CEO) |
|
|
|
| ||||
Wendy L. Teramoto |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||
Kelly M. Williams |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Independent
Member F Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Directors Jack, Felton, Huffines, Ottensmeyer, and Teramoto qualify as “audit committee financial experts” under NYSE and SEC rules. Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee maintains a written charter. These charters, along with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, are available on the Company’s website at https://investors.gbrx.com/corporate-governance.
Succession Planning
EXECUTIVE SUCCESSION
The Board provides oversight of key executive officer transitions. The Board, together with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, exercises this oversight role through regular review and implementation of the Company’s succession planning process for key leadership and operational positions. Our multi-year succession plan has resulted in the refreshment of the majority of our executive officers over the last three fiscal years, from 2021 to 2023.
Our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer oversee the talent pipeline initiative for other key positions. This includes creating talent profiles for potential succession candidates and implementing tailored development plans with specific actions.
The Board reviews our talent pipeline activities regularly, and meets formally and informally with our CEO, key executives, and other high-potential members of senior management.
CEO SUCCESSION
Lorie L. Tekorius’ appointment as CEO in March 2022 was the result of a multi-year succession strategy led by the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which focused on identifying the best candidate and implementing a smooth transition. As a continuation of this transition, and consistent with our commitment to Board refreshment, Bill Furman, the Company’s co-founder and former Chief Executive Officer, will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
16
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Risk Oversight
The Board has delegated to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee primary responsibility for risk management oversight. In order to ensure that Board expertise is utilized most effectively in risk management, certain other standing committees are given primary risk management oversight responsibility of certain categories of risks, such as the Compensation Committee’s oversight of compensation risk and the Audit Committee’s oversight of certain financial controls and cybersecurity risks. Greenbrier has established an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program to ensure risks are addressed in a manner consistent with the Company’s overall corporate strategy, including a strong focus on railcar safety and cybersecurity. Key risk identification, evaluation, and mitigation actions are reviewed quarterly by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other committees, and, as appropriate, are considered by the entire Board. The entire Board remains actively engaged in the oversight and effective implementation of the ERM program. The Board as a whole is directly engaged in overseeing the management of all significant risks, especially risks that implicate public safety. See “Environmental and Social” below for more information regarding our strategy and Board oversight with respect to employee safety and human capital management.
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial and accounting risk assessment and risk management policies, including monitoring and recommending to the Board any modifications regarding the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Policy Regarding Trading in Company Securities. The Audit Committee also reviews the policies and procedures of the Company with respect to maintaining information and data security. The Audit Committee reviews cybersecurity on a quarterly basis with all Board members present.
The Compensation Committee evaluates the Company’s compensation programs and has concluded that its risks are effectively mitigated by a variety of policies including clawback, anti-hedging, and stock ownership policies. The compensation program balances between short-term and long-term incentives and establishes multiple and strategically weighted performance measures. Based on the results of its evaluation, the Compensation Committee concluded that any risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and FCPA Compliance
We strive for the highest ethical standards in all of our business dealings. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics guides our Board, executive officers, and employees in the work they do for the Company. We work diligently to ensure that all our employees fully understand and are empowered to implement ethical practices and promptly report any noncompliant or suspicious activity. The Company maintains the right to require any employee to supply a written statement certifying compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers, employees, and consultants, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on the Company’s website at https://investors.gbrx.com/corporate-governance.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is closely tied to our FCPA and Anti-Corruption Policy. We are an international company, and as such, compliance with all anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws is a key component of our ethics commitment. We conduct ongoing compliance training at all our locations across the globe.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
17
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation
Our non-employee director compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and reward qualified non-employee directors and align the financial interests of non-employee directors with those of our shareholders. Pursuant to this program, each non-employee member of our Board received the cash and equity compensation described below for fiscal 2023 Board service. We also reimbursed our non-employee directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings, assisting with other Company business, such as meeting with potential officer and director candidates, as well as continuing director education. Members of the Board who are our employees are not separately compensated for serving on the Board.
Our Compensation Committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing the compensation paid to our non-employee directors and making recommendations for adjustments, as appropriate, to the full Board. The Compensation Committee undertakes an annual review of the type and form of compensation paid to our non-employee directors, which includes a market assessment and analysis by its independent compensation consultant, Mercer, a national compensation consulting firm (“Mercer”). No changes were made in fiscal 2023 to our fiscal 2023 non-employee director compensation program, other than in connection with Admiral Fargo’s transition from Lead Director to Chair of the Board, as described below. The Board believes that the fiscal 2023 compensation program for our non-employee directors attracted, retained, and rewarded qualified non-employee directors, consistent with market practices and the demands placed on our Board.
FISCAL 2023 CASH COMPENSATION
In fiscal 2023, non-employee directors received an annual cash retainer of $80,000. The Audit Committee chair received an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, and each other committee chair received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000. The Chair of the Board, Admiral Fargo, received an additional cash retainer of $150,000 (increased from $70,000 in fiscal 2022 to reflect his transition from Lead Director to Chair of the Board). Members of the Audit Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000, and members of the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees received an additional annual cash retainer of $7,500. All annual retainer fees were paid quarterly.
FISCAL 2023 EQUITY COMPENSATION
We maintain the Company Stock Incentive Grant Program for Non-Employee Directors under the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the program, upon a director’s initial election to the Board, the director automatically receives an “initial” award of restricted stock units (RSUs) with a value of $145,000. If such initial election occurs prior to the next annual meeting of shareholders, this initial award is prorated. A director who is also an employee of the Company, and who subsequently ceases such employment status but remains a director, is not eligible for such an initial award. Immediately following each annual meeting of shareholders, each director automatically receives an “annual” award of RSUs with a value of $145,000. Both the initial award and the annual award vest on the earlier of (a) the one-year anniversary of grant and (b) the next annual meeting of shareholders (if such meeting is at least 50 weeks after the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders). In the event of a director’s termination of service due to death, disability, or retirement, or because such director is not nominated or re-elected to serve an additional term as a director, any unvested portion of the director’s initial award or annual award will vest. In the event of a director’s termination of service due to such director’s removal or resignation, any unvested portion of the director’s initial award or annual award will be forfeited. Dividends on unvested RSUs are subject to the same vesting terms as the unvested RSUs to which they relate. Upon a Company change of control, all unvested initial and annual director awards will vest.
For fiscal 2023, pursuant to the program described above, Mr. Ottensmeyer received an initial award of RSUs covering 2,451 shares, determined by dividing $145,000 by the average closing price for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the grant date, rounded up to the nearest whole share, and prorating for Mr. Ottensmeyer’s commencement of services with us. All our other non-employee directors received an award of RSUs covering 4,050 shares, determined by dividing $145,000 by the average closing price for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the grant date, rounded up to the nearest whole share.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
18
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
FISCAL 2023 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the compensation of the non-employee Board members for fiscal year 2023. Ms. Tekorius did not receive compensation for her service as a director in fiscal 2023. Ms. Tekorius’ compensation for her service as an employee is discussed in the executive compensation disclosures below.
FISCAL 2023 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name |
Fees Earned ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
All Other ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Thomas B. Fargo |
260,000 | 116,073 | — | 376,073 | ||||||||||||
Wanda F. Felton |
97,500 | 116,073 | — | 213,573 | ||||||||||||
William A. Furman |
80,000 | 116,073 | (2) | — | 196,073 | |||||||||||
Antonio O. Garza |
87,500 | 116,073 | — | 203,573 | ||||||||||||
James R. Huffines |
90,000 | 116,073 | — | 206,073 | ||||||||||||
Graeme A. Jack |
125,000 | 116,073 | — | 241,073 | ||||||||||||
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer |
13,333 | 104,952 | — | 118,285 | ||||||||||||
David L. Starling |
47,500 | 116,073 | 127,720 | (3) | 291,293 | |||||||||||
Charles J. Swindells |
80,000 | 116,073 | 120,000 | (4) | 316,073 | |||||||||||
Wendy L. Teramoto |
97,500 | 116,073 | — | 213,573 | ||||||||||||
Kelly M. Williams |
120,000 | 116,073 | — | 236,073 |
(1) | The amounts in the Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted to directors in fiscal 2023 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (Compensation – Stock Compensation), excluding estimated forfeitures. Such amounts may not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by them if and when the RSU awards vest. As of August 31, 2023, each director, except for Mr. Ottensmeyer and Mr. Starling, held 4,050 unvested RSUs and 103 corresponding dividend equivalent rights; Mr. Ottensmeyer held 2,451 unvested RSUs and 15 corresponding dividend equivalent rights; and Mr. Starling held no unvested equity awards. In addition, as of August 31, 2023, Mr. Furman held 89,443 unvested performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) (assuming target achievement) granted to him in his role as Chief Executive Officer prior to his retirement. |
(2) | In fiscal 2023, Mr. Furman received 121,752 shares pursuant to the vesting of a PSU award granted to him in his role as Chief Executive Officer prior to his retirement. Pursuant to its terms, the award remained outstanding following his retirement as Chief Executive Officer, subject to vesting upon achievement of performance metrics. |
(3) | Mr. Starling unexpectedly passed away in February 2023. The amounts in the All Other Compensation column reflect the accelerated vesting of the RSUs, already reflected in the Stock Awards column, together with corresponding dividend equivalents rights, upon his death in accordance with the Company Stock Incentive Grant Program for Non-Employee Directors under the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. |
(4) | Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Swindells in fiscal 2023 pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Company entered into in January 2016. |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
We maintain an unfunded, voluntary non-qualified deferred compensation plan for our non-employee directors, which allows our non-employee directors to defer compensation received in exchange for their non-employee director services to us. We do not contribute to the plan. We do not guarantee any returns on participant contributions to the plan. The plan does not pay or provide for preferential or above-market earnings. Amounts deferred under the plan are credited with hypothetical and/or actual investment earnings based on participant investment elections made from among investment options available under the plan. Distributions may be made in lump-sum or in installments (subject to certain restrictions in the plan) upon the non-employee director’s death, disability, other termination of service, a change of control of us, and certain unforeseeable emergencies, each as defined in the plan.
FISCAL 2024 COMPENSATION
In late fiscal 2023, as a result of the Compensation Committee’s annual assessment and analysis, we increased compensation levels for non-employee directors effective fiscal 2024 in order to continue to attract, retain, and reward qualified non-employee directors. The last time we increased compensation levels for non-employee directors was fiscal 2019, other than as described above in connection with Admiral Fargo’s transition from Lead Director to Chair of the Board. The annual cash retainer fee for non-Chair non-employee directors was increased from $80,000 to $100,000, the cash retainer for the Chair of the Board was increased from $150,000 to $165,000, and the value of the initial and annual equity awards was increased from $145,000 to $160,000.
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND STOCK RETENTION
We believe that our non-employee directors should hold a meaningful financial stake in the Company to further align their interests with those of our shareholders. To promote this belief, the Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for its non-employee directors pursuant to which all non-employee directors of the Company are required to acquire and retain holdings of Company stock with a value equal to five times the annual cash retainer. As of the end of fiscal 2023, all of our non-employee directors met, exceeded, or are on track to meet, these guidelines.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
19
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Shareholder Engagement
We actively and regularly engage with shareholders to identify and understand matters important to them. Our independent Chair of the Board, Board Committee Chairs and Management team are directly involved in these efforts, which are reported to the entire Board. Following our 2023 Annual Meeting, we contacted institutional shareholders representing approximately 74% of our shares (including 100% of our shares represented by our top 20 shareholders) to, among other things, discuss our executive compensation program, policies, and practices, solicit feedback and ensure that we had insight into the issues that were most important to our shareholders so that we could better understand their perspectives. We met with institutional shareholders representing 59% of our shares. These figures are based on the number of shares outstanding as of the end of fiscal year 2023. In the course of 50 meetings with our institutional shareholders, we received valuable feedback.
WHAT WE DISCUSSED
• | Strong execution of executive succession strategy |
• | Our compensation philosophy for our executive team |
• | The amount and form of our named executive officers’ pay, including performance metrics and related disclosures regarding such metrics |
• | Board structure and composition, including our classified board structure and our ongoing Board refreshment initiatives |
• | Business outlook and demand environment |
Depending on availability and specific shareholder requests, Greenbrier was represented at these engagements by the Chairs of our Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and by senior executives including our CEO, Chief Human Resources Officer, SVP External Affairs and VP Corporate Finance and Treasurer and Chief Legal Officer or General Counsel. Shareholder engagement activity and feedback is reported directly to the Board, either by the Committee Chairs, if they participated, or by Management.
See “Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Engagement on Compensation” on page 26 of this Proxy Statement for further information regarding key feedback from shareholders related to our executive compensation program and our responses.
Environmental and Social
We strive to continually integrate our ESG values of Safety and Quality, People, Environmental Sustainability, Governance and Ethics, and Communities into our broader business strategy. Greenbrier’s 2023 ESG report, provides further detail about our priorities and the actions we took in fiscal 2023 and that we will take in the future, and can be found at www.gbrx.com/ESG/.
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability is central to Greenbrier. Our core product offerings are not only among the most fuel-efficient modes of transport globally, but freight railcars are designed for a 40-year useful life. We remain dedicated to traditional stewardship by reducing our environmental footprint and are committed to meeting or exceeding environmental regulations in the countries where we operate. Greenbrier continues to progress on our sustainability goals, which are informed by a materiality assessment completed in fiscal 2021. For example, we have expanded our waste management tracking to include what our facilities send to landfill and have implemented a formal Environmental, Health and Safety policy at each plant. Our first pilot project for site-level generation of renewable energy was implemented at our manufacturing facility in Tlaxcala, Mexico. To ensure sustained alignment, Greenbrier will continue to balance our environmental focus areas and goals with our overall corporate strategy. We plan to refresh our materiality assessment regularly, with a periodic review of the priority issues.
SAFETY
Greenbrier knows that promoting the health and safety of our employees is vital to our success. We believe no one should be injured while working at Greenbrier. In addition to following strict U.S., E.U. and other applicable requirements, Greenbrier operates under a
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
20
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Health & Safety Management System that was developed consistent with ISO 45001. As part of our safety program, each production shift begins with a safety briefing. Senior Management reviews monthly safety data, while the Board is updated each quarter. Our culture of safety evolves and works towards continuous improvement. Notably, several locations have achieved multiple years without a recordable incident and one new railcar manufacturing facility had no recordable incidents in fiscal 2023. Greenbrier’s safety program is robust, effective, and ingrained in our company culture.
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Greenbrier manufactures, leases, and services a broad range of freight railcars and components on four continents which requires a large number of highly-skilled employees working in manufacturing facilities and plants to produce at scale consistently high-quality and safe products. We do not take our employees for granted. We have no higher priorities than ensuring our employees have a safe and inclusive working environment that promotes their health and well-being, and provides them opportunities for development.
With the oversight of our Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Greenbrier’s approach to human capital management (HCM) is wide-reaching and encompasses many facets including business strategy alignment, talent pipeline planning, diversity and inclusion, training and development, employee well-being, workforce safety, and risk mitigation. Different aspects of human capital management are reviewed quarterly by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit Committee with participation of all Board members.
Culture and work environment are increasingly vital in retaining talent. This year, we deployed a new onboarding framework across our U.S. operations, spanning each employee’s pre-hire period through the employee’s first 90 days of employment, designed to guide employees and managers through successful integration. We also conduct employee surveys in the United States and Mexico to gain important insights to strengthen our Company and improve the employee experience. Mexico hosted the employee survey in fiscal 2023 and received a 95% participation rate. We use the results from these surveys to create actionable goals, such as enhancing communications, providing more training and development opportunities, and implementing a formal recognition and reward program.
Our HCM strategy also supports our IDEAL (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Access and Leadership) commitment. In fiscal 2022, we created a framework for Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) at Greenbrier and were pleased by the formation of six ERGs during that innaugural year and an additional two in fiscal 2023. ERGs are voluntary, employee-driven groups that are organized around a shared interest or dimension and provide an opportunity for employees to network as well as promote cultural diversity, education, and professional development of its members, contributing to the success of Greenbrier’s IDEAL mission. We hosted our first-ever Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Summit in 2023 to celebrate our successes and develop new goals for the future of our IDEAL program.
Our deep commitment to workplace safety and our promotion of employee health and well-being supports our overall emphasis on attracting a diverse talent base and fostering an inclusive culture for our global workforce.
DIVERSITY OF OUR LEADERSHIP
After the Annual Meeting, our Board will be 44% female, versus the Russell 3000 index average of 29% as of June 30, 2023. Greenbrier was previously recognized by the nonprofit, 50/50 Women on Boards, as one of the few Oregon publicly-traded companies with over 20% female representation on the Board. In addition, after the Annual Meeting, one third of our Board self-identifies as racially or ethnically diverse.
Related Person Transactions
Under Greenbrier’s written Related Transactions Policy, the Audit Committee of the Board has the responsibility to review and, if appropriate, approve (or, when applicable, ratify) all related person transactions. Standard procedure is for related person transactions to be submitted to the Audit Committee (or its designated representative) for consideration prior to consummation whenever practicable. If advance approval of a related person transaction is not practicable under the circumstances or if Greenbrier management becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, the transaction is submitted to the Committee at the Committee’s next meeting. The Committee is required to review and consider all relevant information available to it about each related person transaction, and a transaction is considered approved or ratified under the policy if the Committee authorizes it according to the terms of the policy. Related person transactions of an ongoing nature are reviewed annually by the Committee. The definition of “related person transactions” for purposes of the Policy covers the transactions that are required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
21
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Aircraft Usage. Bill Furman, one of our directors, is the ultimate owner of a private aircraft managed by a private independent management company. From time to time, the Company’s business requires charter use of privately owned aircraft, which may include the aircraft owned by Mr. Furman. During fiscal 2023, charters of the aircraft owned by Mr. Furman were placed with or through the company that manages Mr. Furman’s aircraft aggregating approximately $66,818. The approximate dollar value of the amount of Mr. Furman’s interest in the transactions was $36,465. The fiscal 2023 charters of the aircraft owned by Mr. Furman were reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with Greenbrier’s Related Transactions Policy as described in the preceding paragraph.
Indebtedness of Management. Since the beginning of fiscal 2023, none of our directors or executive officers have been indebted to us.
Majority Voting Policy
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines establish a majority voting policy with respect to the election of directors. Pursuant to the policy, in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee who has received a greater number of votes withheld from his or her election than votes for his or her election will, within two weeks following certification of the shareholder vote by the Company, submit a written resignation offer to the Board for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation offer and, within 60 days following certification of the shareholder vote by the Company, make a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of the resignation offer.
The Company will publicly disclose, in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC, the decision of the Board. The Board will also provide an explanation of the process by which the decision was made and, if applicable, its reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.
Communication with the Board
Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with members of the Board by mail addressed to the Chair of the Board, to any other individual member of the Board, to the full Board, to the non-management directors as a group, or to a particular committee of the Board. In each case, such correspondence should be sent to the Company’s headquarters at One Centerpointe Drive, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 or via email to investorrelations@gbrx.com. Such communications are distributed as appropriate. Please note that communications with directors does not constitute service of process to the Company and that nominations and shareholder proposals must be submitted in accordance with the procedure set forth on pages 61 to 62.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
22
PROPOSAL 1 |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors have recommended the following three nominees for election. Class III Directors Bill Furman and Butch Swindells are not standing for re-election and are retiring.
• | Lorie L. Tekorius, Kelly M. Williams, and Patrick J. Ottensmeyer as Class III Directors. |
• | Patrick J. Ottensmeyer was appointed as a Class II director by the Board in June 2023. Under Greenbrier’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, directors appointed by the Board stand for election at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As a result, Mr. Ottensmeyer is standing for election at this Annual Meeting. Due to the planned departures of Mr. Furman and Ambassador Swindells (each a Class III director), Mr. Ottensmeyer is standing for election as a Class III director in order that the classes remain as nearly equal in number as possible after the Annual Meeting. |
The Class III candidates are nominated to serve a three-year term, until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2027, or until their respective successors are qualified and elected. If a nominee is unable or unwilling to serve as a director at the date of the applicable Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee, designated by the proxy holders or by the present Board of Directors to fill such vacancy, or for the other nominees named without nomination of a substitute, or the number of directors may be reduced accordingly. The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unwilling or unable to serve if elected a director.
Under Oregon law, the directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of the vote.
![]() |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF Mr. Ottensmeyer, Ms. Tekorius, and Ms. Williams. Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will be voted FOR the election of the three nominees. |
Directors are divided into three classes, with three directors in Class I and four directors each in Class II and Class III. Typically, one class is elected each year for a three-year term. The following table sets forth certain information about each nominee for election to the Board and each continuing director.
Committee Memberships | ||||||||||||||||
Name |
Independent | Director Since |
Audit |
Compensation | Nominating/ Corp. Gov. |
Expiration of Current Term | ||||||||||
Class I Directors |
||||||||||||||||
Thomas B. Fargo Age: 75 Chair of the Board |
l | 2015 | Chair | l | 2025 | |||||||||||
Antonio O. Garza Age: 64 Director |
l | 2021 | l | l | 2025 | |||||||||||
James R. Huffines Age: 72 Director |
l | 2021 | Financial Expert | l | 2025 | |||||||||||
Class II Directors |
||||||||||||||||
Wanda F. Felton Age: 65 Director |
l | 2017 | Financial Expert | l | 2026 | |||||||||||
Graeme A. Jack Age: 72 Director |
l | 2006 | Chair, Financial Expert | l | l | 2026 | ||||||||||
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer(1),(2) Age: 66 Director |
l | 2023 | Financial Expert | l | 2026 | |||||||||||
Wendy L. Teramoto Age: 49 Director |
l | 2019 | Financial Expert | l | 2026 | |||||||||||
Class III Directors |
||||||||||||||||
William A. Furman (Retiring Jan. 2024) Age: 79 Director |
1994 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
Charles J. Swindells (Retiring Jan. 2024) Age: 81 Director |
l | 2005 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
Lorie L. Tekorius(1) Age: 56 Director and CEO |
2022 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
Kelly M. Williams(1) Age: 59 Director |
l | 2015 | l | l | Chair | 2024 |
(1) | Nominees for Election |
(2) | If elected, Mr. Ottensmeyer will serve as a Class III director in order that the classes remain as nearly equal in number as possible. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
23
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses material information relating to the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2023 (“NEOs”):
Lorie L. Tekorius,
Chief Executive Officer and President
Adrian J. Downes,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Brian J. Comstock,
Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial and Leasing Officer
William Krueger,
Senior Vice President, President Greenbrier Manufacturing Operations
Martin R. Baker,
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain the key executives who drive our success. Pay that reflects performance and aligns with the interests of shareholders is key to our compensation program design and decisions. We structure our executive compensation program to include significant performance metrics that are aligned with our business strategy and shareholder value creation. As described in more detail below, in response to shareholder feedback, in fiscal 2023 we added a relative total stockholder return (rTSR) performance metric to our performance-based restricted stock unit (PSU or performance-based RSU) program. In previous fiscal years the program utilized a rTSR modifier. Our fiscal 2023 PSU program is described in more detail on pages 31-32. Listed below are highlights of our fiscal 2023 executive compensation policies and practices:
WHAT WE DO | ||
✔ | Ongoing engagement with our institutional shareholders regarding our executive compensation policies and practices | |
✔ | Performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Caps on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Significant portion of executive compensation at risk based on company performance | |
✔ | Multi-year equity award vesting periods for equity awards, including three-year performance periods for performance-based equity awards | |
✔ | One-year minimum vesting requirement under equity incentive plan, with limited exceptions | |
✔ | Annual review and approval of our executive compensation program | |
✔ | Annual compensation risk assessment | |
✔ | Annual “Say On Pay” vote | |
✔ | Clawback policy on cash and equity incentive compensation | |
✔ | Robust stock ownership and stock retention guidelines for executive officers | |
✔ | No employment agreements with executive officers | |
✔ | Independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee | |
✔ | 100% independent directors on the Compensation Committee | |
✔ | Limited perquisites |
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
24
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
WHAT WE DON’T DO | ||
× | No “single trigger” change of control payments and benefits | |
× | No tax gross-ups, including for change of control related excise tax payments | |
× | No short sales, hedging, pledging of stock ownership positions, or transactions involving derivatives of our common stock | |
× | No strict benchmarking of executive compensation to a specific percentile of our compensation peer group | |
× | No pension benefits | |
× | No dividend payments on unvested awards | |
× | No ‘repricing’ of out-of-the-money stock options without shareholder approval | |
× | No incentivizing unnecessary or excessive risk taking |
FISCAL 2023 FOCUS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Fiscal 2023 was another year of transformation. We delivered strong results despite challenges that impacted our business throughout the year. While demand in the marketplace remained strong, supply chain challenges, inflation, rising interest rates, rail service congestion, and labor shortages impacted and continue to impact our business and require focused attention from our management. We were able to navigate these trends and exceed key financial goals in fiscal 2023, including achieving record annual revenues of $3.9 billion, an increase of $966.3 million or 32.5% compared to fiscal 2022, and record deliveries, with railcar deliveries increasing 33.2% compared to fiscal 2022.
ADDITIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• | Launched a multi-year strategy during fiscal 2023 that we outlined at our first-ever Investor Day in April 2023. The strategy has three basic tenets: |
• | Maintain our manufacturing leadership position across geographies; |
• | Optimize our industrial footprint for efficiency and margin enhancement while addressing the needs of our customers; and |
• | Grow our recurring revenue to reduce the impact of manufacturing cyclicality. |
• | Conducted a strategic review of our global business capacity, and took actions during the fiscal year to: |
• | Sell the Gunderson Marine business and close our Portland railcar manufacturing facility; |
• | Sell Southwest Steel, a foundry business in Longview, Texas; and |
• | Divest our interest in Rayvag, a manufacturing facility located in Turkey. |
• | Acquired the minority interest in GBX Leasing and now wholly own our lease fleet. |
• | Launched European leasing and syndication business to add another channel to the market. |
• | Ended fiscal year 2023 with strong backlog value and units. Our railcar backlog was 30,900 units with an estimated value of $3.81 billion as of August 31, 2023, with deliveries that extend into 2026. |
• | Increased our quarterly dividend by 11%, to $0.30 per share, starting in July 2023. Fiscal 2023 marks nine consecutive years of dividend payments by the Company. |
• | Repurchased 1.9 million shares for $56.9 million under our share repurchase program. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
25
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AND SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ON COMPENSATION
At our 2023 Annual Meeting, we held a Say-on-Pay vote on the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2022, which received the support of approximately 80% of the votes cast. This was lower than the Say-on-Pay vote support of approximately 88% of the votes cast at our 2022 Annual Meeting for the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2021. The Compensation Committee and our full Board took the Say-on-Pay vote outcome seriously. Following our 2023 Annual Meeting, we contacted institutional shareholders representing approximately 74% of our shares (including 100% of our shares represented by our top 20 shareholders) to, among other things, discuss our executive compensation program, policies, and practices, solicit feedback and ensure that we had insight into the issues that were most important to our shareholders so that we could better understand their perspectives. We met with institutional shareholders representing 59% of our shares. These figures are based on the number of shares outstanding as of the end of fiscal year 2023. We value our shareholders’ opinions and feedback and are committed to maintaining an active dialogue to understand the priorities and concerns of our shareholders. We believe that ongoing engagement builds mutual trust and alignment with our shareholders and is essential to our long-term success.
In the course of 50 meetings with our institutional shareholders, we received valuable feedback on our executive compensation program, policies and practices. These shareholders generally viewed the evolution of our executive compensation program as consistent with what we previously communicated in our outreach over the past several years and consistent with our strategy and pay-for-performance philosophy. The key feedback from our shareholders related to our executive compensation program and our responses are shown in the chart below.
Area of Focus |
What We Heard from Investors | How We Responded | ||
NEO Employment Agreements |
Several shareholders indicated a preference for eliminating NEO employment agreements with “evergreen” provisions | We no longer provide any NEO employment agreements | ||
Clearer Disclosure of PSU metrics |
Several shareholders indicated a preference for enhanced disclosure regarding PSU metrics | This proxy statement includes enhanced narrative and graphic disclosures regarding PSU metrics. Our fiscal 2023 PSU program is described in more detail on pages 31-32 | ||
Amount and Form of NEO Pay |
Shareholders indicated continued support for amount of pay and significant weighting toward equity | As in previous fiscal years, we continued to assess executive compensation in the context of our business strategy, as well as against market practices in consultation with our independent compensation consultant, and maintained significant weighting towards equity | ||
Overlapping Performance Metrics |
Several shareholders indicated a preference for differentiated performance metrics in our annual bonus plan and our PSU program | As in previous fiscal years, the Compensation Committee reviewed the use of EBITDA as a metric in both the annual bonus and PSU programs. The Compensation Committee notes that the aggregate weighting of EBITDA across both compensation programs has declined over time. The Compensation Committee continues to believe that EBITDA is an appropriate and important indicator of our operating performance and correlates with increased shareholder value |
FISCAL 2023 NEO COMPENSATION PROGRAM
PRINCIPLES
The Compensation Committee designed the Company’s executive compensation program to be consistent with the goals of its executive compensation philosophy: to drive performance and increase shareholder value. In evaluating and determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee also considers the results of our most recent Say-on-Pay vote and other feedback from our shareholders. For additional information about the Compensation Committee, see “Corporate Governance—Board Committees, Meetings and Charters—Compensation Committee” in this Proxy Statement. The current compensation program is designed to strengthen and continually reinforce the link between pay and performance.
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
• | Align the interests of key executives with the long-term success of the business, our shareholders, and other stakeholders |
• | Attract, develop, retain, and motivate key executives to drive our business and financial performance |
• | Link a significant amount of executive compensation to achievement of pre-established financial metrics and business goals that are directly tied to our overall business strategy |
• | Incentivize the management team to create shareholder value by balancing growth and return on capital at all points in the business cycle |
Our compensation principles state that:
• | A significant portion of compensation should be performance-based |
• | Total direct compensation should be competitive with the market and based on the complexity of an executive’s assignment, years and depth of experience, and readiness for leadership in the CEO and key executive succession plan |
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
26
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
• | Annual incentive awards should be aligned with the Company’s operating, financial, and strategic objectives while considering the cyclical nature of our business |
• | Long-term incentive plans should promote retention and reward absolute performance as well as relative performance to appropriate peers |
• | A meaningful equity stake helps ensure that executive and shareholder interests are aligned |
In evaluating the competitiveness of our compensation program, we compare it against the programs of peers in related industries at a similar stage of development and comparable financial profile. We also evaluate broader size-appropriate comparisons in related industries. More information about our use of peer group data is provided below. We also assess pay levels and pay mix of our aggregate executive and non-executive compensation programs through compensation positioning, and review realizable pay analysis to inform our decisions. Our compensation philosophy also recognizes the need for flexibility based on experience, scope of position, critical skills, and individual/corporate performance. We consider compensation data from our compensation peer group as one of several factors that informs our judgment of appropriate parameters for compensation levels. We do not strictly benchmark compensation to a specific percentile of our compensation peer group, nor do we apply a formula or assign relative weightings to specific compensation elements. We believe that over-reliance on benchmarking can result in compensation that is unrelated to the value delivered by our executive officers because it does not take into account the specific performance of the executive officers, the relative size, growth, and performance of the Company, or any unique circumstances or strategic considerations of the Company.
ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the performance and compensation of the Company’s senior executive management team, including the NEOs. In making executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee seeks the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, Mercer, as well as our CEO and our management team (except with respect to their own compensation). The Compensation Committee reviews the cash and equity compensation of our executive officers to properly incentivize and reward them for their performance. The role of the Compensation Committee includes:
• | Establishing compensation policies for executive officers and directors of the Company |
• | Reviewing, determining, and approving the compensation of the Company’s CEO |
• | Approving compensation of non-CEO executive officers |
• | Reviewing and approving executive officer change of control agreements and other special benefits, including supplemental retirement benefits |
• | Regularly reviewing, administering, and recommending changes to equity-based and other incentive compensation plans |
• | Annually reviewing the Company’s compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management and evaluating potential risks |
ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate independent consultants, counsel, experts, and other personnel the Compensation Committee deems necessary to enable it to fully perform its duties and fulfill its responsibilities, and to determine the compensation and other terms of engagement for such independent consultants, counsel, experts, and other personnel.
The Compensation Committee directly engaged Mercer as independent consultant for fiscal 2023 to provide information, analysis, and advice regarding executive and director compensation. The Compensation Committee has evaluated the independence of Mercer and concluded that there are no conflicts of interest. Mercer provided the following services for the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2023: (i) advice on 2023 executive officer bonus program structure, performance goals and targets, and bonus amounts; (ii) advice on 2023 executive officer equity grant award sizes and performance goals and targets; (iii) market data and recommendations on executive officer compensation; (iv) advice on equity retention policies and holding requirements after vesting; (v) advice on updating the Company’s peer group companies; and (vi) ongoing advice regarding the Company’s executive compensation practices to advise whether any such practices should be modified to improve effectiveness or to implement “best practices.”
ROLE OF MANAGEMENT
The Compensation Committee consults with our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) when making compensation decisions. Typically, our CEO and CHRO engage with other members of our management team to gather information on corporate and
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
27
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
individual performance and their perspective and recommendations on compensation matters. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation matters, including the compensation of our other executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses these recommendations as one of several factors in making compensation decisions, and those decisions do not necessarily follow the CEO’s recommendations.
PROGRAM DESIGN
The following table describes the material elements of fiscal 2023 pay for NEOs and explains why each element was provided.
Incentive Type |
Compensation Element | What the Element Rewards | Key Features & Purpose | Form of Payment | ||||
Fixed |
Base Salary | Individual performance while considering market pay levels, specific responsibilities and experience of each NEO | • Attract and retain talent
• Provide financial certainty |
Cash | ||||
|
Annual Cash Bonus | Achievement of specific financial and strategic goals | • Drive achievement of key business results on an annual basis |
Cash | ||||
Performance-Based |
Long-Term Equity | Achievement of specific financial goals including relative financial performance |
• Reward achievement of long-term objectives over a three-year performance period
• Directly tie interests of our NEOs to those of our shareholders |
Shares | ||||
Time-Based |
Long-Term Equity | Creation of shareholder value | • Retain talent
• Vest annually in equal installments, generally over a three-year period |
Shares |
PEER GROUP
Greenbrier’s fiscal 2023 compensation peer group is listed below. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews our peer group. Mercer performs an independent review and makes recommendations annually, providing substantial detail and support to the Compensation Committee for consideration. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee removed Meritor, as it was acquired by Cummins Inc. Our fiscal 2023 peer group is:
Astec Industries (ASTE)
Crane (CR)
GATX Corp (GATX)
H&E Equipment Services (HEES)
Hub Group (HUBG)
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling (HY) |
Manitowoc (MTW)
Oshkosh (OSK)
REV Group (REVG)
Terex (TEX)
Timken (TKR) |
Trinity Industries (TRN)
Triton International (TRTN)
Wabash National (WNC)
Westinghouse Air Brake (WAB) |
Peer group companies are chosen based on whether they are in a comparable industry, have comparable revenue or market capitalization, or compete with Greenbrier for executive talent. The current peer group includes companies in the following sectors: railcar manufacturing; heavy manufacturing; other related manufacturing; after-market products; transportation services; and high-value equipment leasing. Annual revenues of the peer group companies range from approximately one-third to three times Greenbrier’s annual revenue, with Greenbrier approximating the peer group median revenue size.
SPECIFIC ELEMENTS OF FISCAL 2023 COMPENSATION
The charts below show the pay mix of our CEO and other NEOs and the components of their pay for fiscal 2023, specifically the base salary at fiscal end 2023, cash bonus amounts earned for fiscal 2023, and the grant date fair value of equity awards granted in fiscal 2023.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
28
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
BASE SALARY
In establishing salary levels, we consider market pay levels, the specific responsibilities and experience of each NEO, and his or her individual performance. As part of its annual review, the Compensation Committee may adjust base salaries, including for:
• | Annual merit increases |
• | Changes in role, such as promotions or added responsibilities |
• | Market adjustments to promote retention |
Base salary for Mr. Comstock was adjusted in early fiscal 2023 to align with market pay levels for executives with similar duties and responsibilities. Base salary for Mr. Krueger was adjusted effective fiscal 2023 in connection with his appointment as President of Greenbrier Manufacturing Operations, effective fiscal 2023. The table below sets forth the base salaries for our NEOs at fiscal end 2022 and 2023.
Named Executive Officer |
Fiscal 2022 Base Salary | Fiscal 2023 Base Salary | Percentage Increase from Fiscal 2022 Base Salary |
|||||||||
Lorie L. Tekorius |
$ | 900,000 | $ | 900,000 | N/A | |||||||
Adrian J. Downes |
$ | 525,000 | $ | 525,000 | N/A | |||||||
Brian J. Comstock |
$ | 575,000 | $ | 600,000 | 4.4% | |||||||
William Krueger |
$ | 535,000 | $ | 560,000 | 4.7% | |||||||
Martin R. Baker |
$ | 465,000 | $ | 465,000 | N/A |
ANNUAL CASH BONUS
A key objective of our compensation philosophy is to tie a significant portion of each NEO’s total direct compensation to company performance. To help accomplish this objective, we provide annual performance-based cash bonus opportunities (“annual bonuses”) for our NEOs, which are earned based on the Company’s achievement against performance objectives established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Target incentive opportunities under the annual bonus plan for NEOs are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The target incentive opportunity for Ms. Tekorius was increased in early fiscal 2023 to align with market pay levels for executives with similar duties and responsibilities. The target incentive opportunity for Mr. Krueger was increased effective fiscal 2023 in connection with his appointment as President of Greenbrier Manufacturing Operations. The table below shows the target annual bonus opportunity for each NEO as a percentage of his or her base salary at fiscal end 2022 and 2023.
Named Executive Officer |
Fiscal 2022 Target | Fiscal 2023 Target | ||||||
Lorie L. Tekorius |
105 | % | 110 | % | ||||
Adrian J. Downes |
85 | % | 85 | % | ||||
Brian J. Comstock |
95 | % | 95 | % | ||||
William Krueger |
90 | % | 95 | % | ||||
Martin R. Baker |
90 | % | 90 | % |
As in fiscal 2022, our NEOs’ fiscal 2023 annual bonus opportunities were based 40% on the achievement of earnings per share (EPS) goals, 40% on the achievement of EBITDA goals, and 20% on the achievement of strategic goals. The Compensation Committee believes that EPS reflects key financial and operational performance objectives, aligns the interests of shareholders with management, and encourages management to focus on all aspects of performance, including top line growth in revenue, expense control, and bottom line results. The annual bonus ultimately earned could have ranged from 0% to 200% of an individual’s target opportunity for the EPS and EBITDA portions of the annual bonus, and 0% to 150% for the strategic goal portion of the annual bonus. Our CEO has discretion to recommend to the Compensation Committee (and the Compensation Committee has discretion in the case of the CEO) to make a downward (but not upward) adjustment of any award by up to 20% to reflect individual performance. No such adjustments were made in fiscal 2023.
The performance metrics, their weighting, targets, and payout levels were established at the beginning of fiscal 2023 by the Compensation Committee with input from management and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. This process included a thorough review and discussion of the risks and variables in management’s financial plan for fiscal 2023,
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
29
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
including existing backlog, production schedules and forecasts of industry demand. The level of performance required for the maximum payout for the EPS and EBITDA portions of the annual bonus was established based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the level of performance that shareholders would consider superior in view of the economic outlook for Greenbrier and its industry. EBITDA and EPS targets for fiscal 2023 were set higher than the level of EBITDA and EPS achievement in fiscal 2022. A comparable process was carried out to establish the threshold or minimum performance level, defined as the level of performance below which no incentive payment is appropriate. Our philosophy is to incentivize management in both strong and weak markets. Our fiscal 2023 EBITDA and EPS goals reflected how our business cycle was impacted by the ongoing recovery from COVID-19 variants and the related supply chain disruptions, as well as from the economic uncertainty and the backdrop of slowly improving demand in the freight rail market.
The following table sets forth the EPS and EBITDA goals under the fiscal 2023 annual cash bonus opportunity. Payout amounts are interpolated between threshold and target, and between target and maximum.
|
EBITDA (in millions) |
EPS | Payout | |||||||||
Threshold (Minimum) |
$175 | $ | 1.33 | 50 | % | |||||||
Target (Goal) |
$250 | $ | 1.90 | 100 | % | |||||||
Maximum |
$375 | $ | 3.00 | 200 | % |
Achievement below threshold results in no payout. After the conclusion of fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee evaluated our performance against the EPS and EBITDA targets and determined that we achieved $2.97 for EPS and approximately $340.3 million for EBITDA.
For fiscal 2023, achievement of strategic goals made up 20% of the annual bonus opportunity, and the goals were focused on three primary areas: strategic evaluation of our global business capacity footprint, successful launch and management of a European leasing business, and development and implementation of a short-term energy and greenhouse gas reduction strategy. After the conclusion of fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee evaluated our performance against the strategic goals, and determined that the strategic goals were achieved at 137.5% of target. In reaching its determination, the Compensation Committee took note of, among other things, the following fiscal 2023 achievements: execution of a cost and capacity restructuring plan in Romania; reduction of several thousand euros per wagon in production costs; significant mitigation impact of the Ukrainian war through renegotiation of existing contracts; strategic evaluation of our North America production capacity and optimal production structure; origination and syndication of several hundred leases for railcars in Europe for fiscal 2023 and into fiscal 2024; continued progress toward new leasing and management infrastructure launch in early fiscal 2024; and completion of a pilot renewable energy project in Central Mexico with average monthly production of just over 67,000 kW hours.
In accordance with the payout multiples described above, the Compensation Committee approved bonus payments to the NEOs in an amount that resulted in a total fiscal 2023 bonus payment for each NEO equaling 175.3% of the NEO’s respective fiscal 2023 target annual cash bonus opportunity. The actual fiscal 2023 annual bonus payments for the NEOs are presented in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
|
EBITDA (in millions) |
EPS (weighted 40%) |
Payout | |||||||||
Threshold (Minimum) |
$ | 175 | $ | 1.33 | 50 | % | ||||||
Target (Goal) |
$ | 250 | $ | 1.90 | 100 | % | ||||||
Actual |
$ | 340.3 | $ | 2.97 | 175.3 | %(1) | ||||||
Maximum |
$ | 375 | $ | 3.00 | 200 | % |
(1) | Includes 137.5% of target for the strategic goal portion (weighted 20%) of the annual bonus opportunity. |
EBITDA for purposes of the annual cash bonus plan is a non-GAAP financial measure. We defined it as net earnings before interest and foreign exchange, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, and the impact associated with items we do not believe are indicative of our core business or which affect comparability, such as asset disposal and exit related costs.
EPS for purposes of the annual cash bonus plan is a non-GAAP financial measure. We defined it as diluted earnings per common share before the impact associated with items we do not believe are indicative of our core business or which affect comparability, such as asset disposal and exit related costs.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
30
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
LONG-TERM EQUITY AWARDS
The most significant component of our NEO compensation program is long-term equity awards. These equity awards focus the efforts of our NEOs on the achievement of long-term objectives and align the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. The value delivered by the equity awards is dependent on our stock price performance, and it is maximized when the Company achieves strong long-term performance. In fiscal 2023, these equity awards consisted of RSUs and PSUs.
Performance-based RSUs are designed to focus attention on, and to reward the achievement of, our long-term financial objectives and sustained appreciation in shareholder value. As described in more detail below, in response to shareholder feedback, in fiscal 2023 we transitioned to a PSU program with a rTSR performance metric (as opposed to a rTSR modifier). We believe that the fiscal 2023 PSUs directly link a significant portion of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation to our stock price performance. At the end of a three-year performance period, a percentage ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs initially awarded will be earned based on the extent to which the three-year goals are achieved. The three-year measurement period begins on September 1 and ends on August 31.
The Compensation Committee approved the fiscal 2023 awards in October 2022. Approximately 60% of each NEO’s target fiscal 2023 equity awards was in the form of PSUs and approximately 40% was in the form of RSUs.
We do not pay dividends on unearned RSUs or PSUs. The target value of the awards intended to be delivered to each NEO was converted into a number of RSUs and target PSUs based on the trailing 30-day average price of a share of our Common Stock. The amount of RSUs and PSUs (including minimum, target and maximum potential payouts) granted to the NEOs in fiscal 2023 are disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in fiscal 2023 table on page 37.
Together, RSUs and PSUs are important tools to motivate and retain our highly valuable executive officers, since the value of the awards is delivered to our executive officers over three-year periods, generally subject to their continued service. We may modify our equity award program from one fiscal year to the next, including performance targets, for our executive officers, including our NEOs, to continue to maintain a strong alignment of their interests with the interests of our shareholders.
Fiscal 2023 PSU Performance Metrics
Our process for setting performance metrics, conducted at the beginning of each three-year performance period, includes goals related to profitability and return on invested capital while taking into account the cyclical nature of our business. Our targets are designed to incent behavior that enhances shareholder value at all points in the business cycle.
The Compensation Committee typically grants equity awards to NEOs during its regularly scheduled meeting early in the fiscal year. However, the timing of this approval may be changed in the event of extraordinary circumstances, including in connection with mid-year promotions and new-hires. The Compensation Committee does not grant equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information. Similarly, the Compensation Committee does not time the release of material nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.
We generally establish our objectives depending on where we are in the business cycle. When backlog and demand are high and asset prices strong, we generally emphasize earning a higher return. When the market is weak and prices are under pressure, we generally emphasize making prudent decisions related to production capacity and other considerations, as well as investments at attractive prices, over attempting to earn unrealistic short-term returns. Making intelligent decisions at the right points in the cycle allows us to increase shareholder value over the long term by protecting our core business and market share. When appropriate and supported by the underlying economic conditions and market demand, the Compensation Committee will increase or decrease targets year-over-year to properly incent management.
The Compensation Committee selected EBITDA, ROIC and rTSR as the metrics for fiscal 2023 PSUs, weighted 60%, 20% and 20% respectively, as follows:
|
EBITDA (in millions) |
ROIC | rTSR | Payout | ||||||||||||
Threshold (Minimum) |
$ | 600 | 6 | % | 25th %tile | 50 | % | |||||||||
Target (Goal) |
$ | 900 | 10 | % | 50th %tile | 100 | % | |||||||||
Maximum |
$ | 1,200 | 15 | % | 75th %tile | 200 | % |
Achievement below threshold results in no payout for the respective metric. Payout amounts are interpolated between threshold and target, and between target and maximum levels, as appropriate. Vesting is independent for each performance criteria.
As in previous fiscal years, the Compensation Committee reviewed the use of EBITDA as a metric in both the annual bonus and long-term performance equity programs. We continue to believe that EBITDA is an important indicator of our operating performance and
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
31
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
correlates with increased shareholder value. We believe that ROIC is a meaningful overall measure of our business performance because it reflects our performance relative to our investments. In response to shareholder feedback, the fiscal 2023 PSU program includes an rTSR performance metric (as opposed to an rTSR modifier). We continue to believe that rTSR is a meaningful measure of shareholder value creation.
The Compensation Committee selected the S&P 600 Index for the rTSR metric given its representation of our industry peers and that it is challenging relative to other potential benchmark indices. The Compensation Committee further believes that the S&P 600 Index is a proxy to measuring a broad and consistent group of companies that will experience similar market influences as the Company over the cycle of the PSU performance period.
Fiscal 2021 PSU Program Payout
As disclosed in our proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting and shown in the table below, the fiscal 2021 PSU program included EBITDA and ROIC goals over a 3-year performance period. The Compensation Committee selected EBITDA and ROIC as the metrics for performance grants in the fiscal 2021 annual PSU program with a relative TSR modifier to continue to focus on alignment of total shareholder return and executive compensation. Weighting of the metrics for the fiscal 2021 award was 80% for EBITDA, and 20% for ROIC to emphasize cash flow generation and earnings. Achievement below threshold would have resulted in no payout for the respective metric. The payout could have been increased or decreased by 10% based on relative TSR performance. The relative TSR modifier would have been used if the Company was in the top three or bottom three among the peers at the end of the 3-year measurement period. The target EBITDA and ROIC goals, and actual performance results, are set forth in the table below:
|
EBITDA (in millions) |
ROIC | Payout | |||||||||
Threshold (Minimum) |
$ | 500 | 6 | % | 50 | % | ||||||
Actual |
$ | 716.8 | 6.1 | % | 79.2 | % | ||||||
Target (Goal) |
$ | 800 | 10 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Maximum |
$ | 1,200 | 15 | % | 200 | % |
At the end of fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee determined that actual achievement of EBITDA was equal to 86.1% of target and actual achievement of ROIC was 51.3% of target. The TSR modifier was not applicable. Payout amounts were interpolated between threshold and target.
EBITDA for purposes of the PSUs is a non-GAAP financial measure. We defined it as net earnings before interest and foreign exchange, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, and the impact associated with items we do not believe are indicative of our core business or which affect comparability, such as asset disposal and exit related costs.
ROIC for purposes of the PSUs is a non-GAAP financial measure. We defined it as the average annual net operating profit after cash taxes for the measurement period divided by the average invested capital for the four annual periods beginning from the last day of the prior fiscal year through the last day of the measurement period, excluding the impact associated with items we do not believe are indicative of our core business or which affect comparability, such as asset disposal and exit related costs.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company maintains a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation (NQDC) Plan that permits participants, including our NEOs, to elect to defer a portion of their compensation, including shares of stock or cash. The NQDC Plan does not pay or provide for preferential or above-market earnings. Amounts deferred under the plan are credited with hypothetical and/or actual earnings based on participant investment elections made from among investment options available under the plan. Messrs. Downes, Comstock and Krueger elected to participate in the NQDC Plan in fiscal 2023; none of the other NEOs elected to defer any portion of their fiscal 2023 cash or equity compensation under the NQDC Plan.
The Company makes discretionary contributions to the NQDC Plan on behalf of participants. In January 2023, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary contributions equal to 6% of participants’ annual base salary earned plus actual bonus earned, in each case for the prior calendar year.
Life Insurance
The Company provides an executive life insurance program to its executive officers and certain other management employees. The Company owns life insurance policies ensuring the executives’ lives and has endorsed the rights to the death benefits to the
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
32
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
participating executives. Upon termination of the executive’s employment, the Company will transfer ownership of the policy to the executive, resulting in taxable income to the executive at the time of transfer. Each NEO participates in the executive life insurance program, and each has an aggregate death benefit amount of $1 million.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
The Company maintains a program of certain perquisites for NEOs. In early fiscal 2023, the Company discontinued the provision of Company-owned automobiles or automobile allowances. The Company continues to not provide tax gross-ups for perquisites or personal benefits and no longer maintains employment agreements with NEOs. We regularly evaluate our perquisite program balancing employment retention challenges and our own industry practices.
The Company provides employee benefits to all eligible employees in the United States, including our NEOs, which the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation objective to better enable us to attract and retain highly talented employees. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in these benefit plans and programs, including, medical, dental, vision, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance and a 401(k) plan with a matching contribution component, on the same basis as other full-time employees.
Termination and Change of Control Provisions
We have entered into agreements with our NEOs that provide certain benefits if employment is terminated in connection with or within 24 months after a change of control (“COC”). The COC agreements are “double-trigger” agreements, meaning that benefits are payable only if a COC occurs and an executive’s employment is involuntarily terminated (including due to death, disability and a resignation by the NEO for “good reason”).
In addition, our 2017 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (“2017 A&R Plan”) and 2021 Stock Incentive Plan and the related award agreements provide for full accelerated vesting of restricted stock and RSU awards upon termination of an NEO’s employment due to death or disability (with performance-based awards vesting at the target level). In the event of a COC in which equity awards are not converted, assumed, substituted or replaced, all restricted stock and RSU awards will vest in full (with performance-based awards vesting based on actual achievement and, for performance-based awards granted after 2020, prorated for the duration of the performance period prior to such COC).
NEOs who have deferred a portion of their compensation under our NQDC Plan may be entitled to payment of deferred amounts upon a termination of employment or a COC, depending on the NEO’s deferral elections and payment triggering events.
We believe that these protections serve our retention objectives by permitting our NEOs to maintain continued focus and dedication to their responsibilities in order to maximize shareholder value, including in the event of a transaction that could result in a COC of the Company. We believe that these protections promote the stability, continuity and impartiality of our executives in a COC situation. The level of protection is intended to be similar to that provided by similarly sized organizations.
NEO COMPENSATION FISCAL 2024
Looking forward to fiscal 2024, we continue to focus on shareholder alignment and our commitment to pay-for-performance.
2024 Annual Incentive Metrics |
2024-2026 Long-Term Incentive Metrics | |
• An earnings per share (EPS) metric, which accounts for 40% of the payout weighting to ensure alignment with shareholders’ interests
• Continuing an EBITDA metric, which accounts for 40% of the payout weighting
• Strategic goals, which account for 20% of payout weighting and are focused on three primary areas: manufacturing excellence, technology, and human capital management
• EBITDA and EPS targets were set higher than 2023 achievement
|
• For PSUs, EBITDA, ROIC, and rTSR performance metrics, with 60%, 20% and 20%, respectively of the payout weighting
• Retain weighting that is heavily performance-based with at least 60% of the awards being performance-based for our NEOs
• Utilizing EBITDA and ROIC to incentivize earnings, operational cash flow and capital efficiency
• EBITDA target is higher and ROIC is the same as the prior targets set in fiscal 2023 |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
33
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
GOVERNANCE
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND STOCK RETENTION
The Company has stock ownership guidelines for its executive officers, including the NEOs, under which all executive officers of the Company are expected to retain holdings of Company stock (with a value equal to a multiple of base salary ranging from three to six times base salary for NEOs). The applicable multiple depends on the executive officer’s position with the Company, as set forth below.
Named Executive Officer |
Stock Ownership Target as a Multiple of Salary |
In Compliance/ On Track Yes/No | ||||||||
CEO & PRESIDENT, Lorie L. Tekorius |
6.0x | Yes | ||||||||
SVP, Adrian J. Downes |
3.0x | Yes | ||||||||
EVP, Brian J. Comstock |
3.0x | Yes | ||||||||
SVP, William Krueger |
3.0x | Yes | ||||||||
SVP, Martin R. Baker |
3.0x | Yes |
Executive officers are expected to achieve compliance with the applicable guidelines within five years of the date of adoption of the guidelines or appointment as an executive officer, whichever is later. They are encouraged to retain ownership of shares representing at least 50% of the after-tax value acquired through compensatory stock awards until the guidelines are met. Shares that count towards satisfaction of the guidelines include shares covered by unvested RSUs. Shares subject to unexercised options, unvested PSUs and shares subject to future sales in a 10b5-1 plan do not count towards satisfaction of the guidelines. All of our NEOs have satisfied, or are on track to meet, the executive stock ownership expectation.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICY
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), we maintain a clawback policy, which requires that certain incentive compensation paid to any current or former executive officer, including our NEOs, will be subject to recoupment if (x) the incentive compensation was calculated based on financial statements that were required to be restated due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements, without regard to any fault or misconduct, and (y) that noncompliance resulted in overpayment of the incentive compensation within the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the restatement was required. Incentive compensation subject to the clawback policy consists of compensation that is granted, earned or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure (as defined in the rules implementing such requirement), including stock price and total shareholder return, on and after October 2, 2023.
HEDGING AND PLEDGING OF COMPANY STOCK
The Company’s Policy Regarding Trading in Company Securities prohibits directors, executive officers, including the NEOs, and employees from hedging the economic risk of owning shares of Company stock (including engaging in short sales, trading in or writing options on Company securities, or entering into other hedging transactions, including, but not limited to, prepaid variable forward contracts, zero-cost collars, equity swaps or exchange funds). The policy also restricts directors and executive officers from holding Company stock in a margin account, or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan, except in very limited circumstances (not including margin debt) with advance approval of the Board Chair and CEO. No such approvals have been given to date.
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Generally, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), disallows a tax deduction to certain publicly-held corporations for any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid in any taxable year to their chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and certain other current and former highly compensated officers that qualify as covered employees within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee has previously considered tax deductibility when structuring our executive compensation arrangements for our current and former executive officers. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, pay compensation that is not fully tax deductible to the extent it determines that doing so is appropriate to attract and retain executive talent or to meet other business needs. The Compensation Committee intends to continue to compensate our current and former executive officers, including the NEOs, in a manner consistent with our best interests and the best interests of our shareholders.
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
34
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TAXATION OF “PARACHUTE” PAYMENTS AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION
We do not provide our NEOs with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that the NEO might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A of the Code. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers, directors who hold significant equity interests in our Company, and certain other service providers may be subject to an excise tax if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change of control of our Company that exceeds certain prescribed limits, and that the Company, or a successor, may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. Section 409A of the Code also imposes additional significant taxes on an executive officer, director or other service provider to the Company in the event that he or she receives “deferred compensation” that does not meet certain requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We follow the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 for our stock-based awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 generally requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards (including PSUs), based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below for equity awards to our NEOs as required by the applicable SEC rules. FASB ASC Topic 718 also generally requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that the recipient of such compensation is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award. For performance unit awards (including PSUs), stock-based compensation expense recognized may be adjusted over the performance period based on interim estimates of performance against pre-set objectives.
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Mercer, assesses and considers potential risks when reviewing and approving our compensation programs, policies and practices for our executive officers, including our NEOs, and our employees. We designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking. Based on its assessment, the Compensation Committee believes that any risks arising from our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
As required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management the above section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” prepared by the Company’s management as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2023.
Thomas B. Fargo, Chairman
Graeme A. Jack
Wendy L. Teramoto
Kelly M. Williams
Mr. Huffines and Mr. Ottensmeyer each joined the Compensation Committee in October 2023 and thus did not contribute to this Compensation Committee Report or the matters discussed herein.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
35
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation Tables
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL 2023
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) |
Stock Awards(1) ($) |
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) |
All Other Compensation(3) ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS Chief Executive Officer and President |
2023 | 900,000 | 2,819,190 | 1,735,470 | 184,821 | 5,639,481 | ||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 800,000 | 1,666,024 | 1,382,640 | 127,742 | 3,976,406 | |||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 675,000 | 1,638,078 | 666,792 | 116,218 | 3,096,088 | |||||||||||||||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
2023 | 525,000 | 702,254 | 782,276 | 90,503 | 2,100,033 | ||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 508,333 | 527,594 | 711,209 | 66,221 | 1,813,357 | |||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 458,333 | 491,424 | 366,520 | 58,630 | 1,374,907 | |||||||||||||||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK Executive Vice President, |
2023 | 591,667 | (4) | 1,230,202 | 985,332 | 103,975 | 2,911,176 | |||||||||||||||||
2022 | 562,500 | 1,110,684 | 879,582 | 115,041 | 2,667,807 | |||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 506,667 | 982,847 | 452,839 | 85,756 | 2,028,109 | |||||||||||||||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER Senior Vice President, |
2023 | 560,000 | 861,138 | 932,596 | 104,917 | 2,458,651 | ||||||||||||||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER Senior Vice President, |
2023 | 465,000 | 645,875 | 733,631 | 87,894 | 1,932,400 |
(1) | The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the time-based RSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021 and the performance-based RSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding estimated forfeitures. The estimated fair value of performance-based RSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance measures for the applicable performance period as of the date on which the performance-based RSUs were granted for accounting purposes. Performance-based RSUs include both corporate performance and market-related goals. Consistent with the applicable accounting standards, the grant date fair value of the market-related goal component has been determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are consistent with the valuation methodologies specified in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023. The grant date fair value of the fiscal 2023 performance-based RSUs assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved under the applicable performance measures is $3,503,874 for Ms. Tekorius; $872,785 for Mr. Downes; $1,528,975 for Mr. Comstock; $1,070,265 for Mr. Krueger and $802,730 for Mr. Baker. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by our NEOs. |
(2) | The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column reflect actual payments made under the annual cash bonus plan for fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021. |
(3) | The amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column for fiscal 2023 consist of (i) $134,958, $74,173, $87,275, $79,116, and $68,194 in discretionary employer contributions under the NQDC Plan for Ms. Tekorius and Messrs. Downes, Comstock, Krueger, and Baker, respectively; (ii) $12,200 in matching employer contributions under the 401(k) plan for each NEO; (iii) $14,900, $4,130, $4,500, $2,400, and $7,500 in life insurance premiums for Ms. Tekorius and Messrs. Downes, Comstock, Krueger, and Baker, respectively, (iv) benefits related to spousal attendance at Company business events and executive medical benefits for Ms. Tekorius and Mr. Krueger and (v) an automobile allowance for Ms. Tekorius (which was discontinued in early fiscal 2023 when the Company discontinued the provision of Company-owned automobiles or automobile allowances). The value of such benefits was determined based on the actual cost of such benefits to the Company. |
(4) | The amount reported reflects a mid-year compensation increase. |
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
36
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2023
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
|
All Other (#)
|
Grant Value of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,705 | 61,407 | 122,814 |
|
|
|
1,751,937 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,938 | 1,067,253 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
396,000 | 990,000 | 1,881,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,649 | 15,296 | 30,592 |
|
|
|
436,392 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,198 | 265,862 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
178,500 | 446,250 | 847,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,399 | 26,796 | 53,592 |
|
|
|
764,487 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,864 | 465,715 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
228,000 | 570,000 | 1,083,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,380 | 18,757 | 37,514 |
|
|
|
535,133 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,505 | 326,005 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
212,800 | 532,000 | 1,010,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034 | 14,068 | 28,136 |
|
|
|
401,364 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
10-18-22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,379 | 244,511 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
167,400 | 418,500 | 794,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The amounts reported in the Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards columns reflect potential payments under the annual cash bonus opportunity for NEOs, if performance had been achieved at the threshold, target or maximum performance levels. Actual payments under the annual cash bonus opportunity earned for fiscal 2023 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the annual cash bonus opportunity. |
(2) | The amounts reported in the Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards columns reflect payout opportunities of the performance-based RSUs granted under the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. The performance-based RSUs generally vest at the end of the three-year performance period upon achieving set performance metrics, generally subject to the NEO’s continued service to us. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the performance-based RSUs. |
(3) | The amounts reported in this column reflect time-based RSUs granted under the 2021 Stock Incentive Plan, which, other than the time-based RSUs granted to Mr. Baker, generally vest annually over three years in equal installments, subject to the NEO’s continued service to us. Mr. Baker’s time-based RSUs generally vest annually over two years, subject to Mr. Baker’s continued service to us. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the time-based RSUs. |
(4) | The amounts reported in the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the time-based RSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2023 and the performance-based RSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2023, as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, excluding estimated forfeitures. The estimated fair value of performance-based RSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance measures for the applicable performance period as of the date on which the performance-based RSUs were granted for accounting purposes. Performance-based RSUs include both corporate performance and market-related goals. Consistent with the applicable accounting standards, the grant date fair value of the market-related goal component has been determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are consistent with the valuation methodologies specified in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023. |
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
37
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AS OF 2023 FISCAL YEAR-END
Stock Awards
|
||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Shares that Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares that Have Not Vested ($)(1) |
Equity Incentive Plan or Other Rights (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan ($)(1) |
||||||||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
6,574 | (2) | 279,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
9,126 | (3) | 388,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
40,938 | (4) | 1,742,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,586 | (7) | 1,259,180 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,481 | (8) | 786,551 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,705 | (9) | 1,306,805 | |||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
1,972 | (2) | 83,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
2,890 | (3) | 122,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
10,198 | (4) | 434,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,876 | (7) | 377,763 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,853 | (8) | 249,104 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,649 | (9) | 325,541 | |||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
3,944 | (2) | 167,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
6,084 | (3) | 258,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
17,864 | (4) | 760,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,752 | (7) | 755,525 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,321 | (8) | 524,382 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,399 | (9) | 570,261 | |||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
2,404 | (5) | 102,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
4,639 | (3) | 197,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
12,505 | (4) | 532,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,615 | (7) | 409,214 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,263 | (8) | 266,553 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,380 | (9) | 399,213 | |||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
2,739 | (2) | 116,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
3,802 | (3) | 161,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
9,379 | (6) | 399,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,328 | (7) | 524,680 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,701 | (8) | 327,755 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,034 | (9) | 299,367 |
(1) | Amounts calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on NYSE on August 31, 2023 (the last trading day of our fiscal year), which was $42.56. |
(2) | Time-based RSUs granted on October 20, 2020, vesting on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date in equal installments, generally subject to continued service to us. |
(3) | Time-based RSUs granted on October 20, 2021, vesting on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date in equal installments, generally subject to continued service to us. |
(4) | Time-based RSUs granted on October 18, 2022, vesting on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date in equal installments, generally subject to continued service to us. |
(5) | Time-based RSUs granted on October 20, 2020, 50% vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 25% vesting on each of the second and third anniversary of the grant date, generally subject to continued service to us. |
(6) | Time-based RSUs granted on October 18, 2022, vesting on the first and second anniversary of the grant date in equal installments, generally subject to continued service to us. |
(7) | Performance-based RSUs granted on October 20, 2020, and subject to vesting contingent on the achievement of performance goals for the performance period ending August 31, 2023. The number of shares and payout value included in the table for these awards are calculated based on achieving target performance goals. In early fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that 79.2% of each NEO’s target PSUs were earned based on the three-year performance period, and such PSUs became vested. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding these awards. |
(8) | Performance-based RSUs granted on October 20, 2021, and subject to vesting contingent on the achievement of performance goals for the performance period ending August 31, 2024. The number of shares and payout value included in the table for these awards are calculated based on achieving target EBITDA goals and threshold ROIC goals. |
(9) | Performance-based RSUs granted on October 18, 2022, and subject to vesting contingent on the achievement of performance goals for the performance period ending August 31, 2025. The number of shares and payout value included in the table for these awards are calculated based on achieving threshold performance goals. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for additional details regarding the performance-based RSUs. |
![]() |
THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES |
38
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2023
|
Stock Awards
|
|||||||
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized On Vesting ($)(1) |
||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
38,982 | 1,388,479 | ||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
5,056 | 129,458 | ||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
10,266 | 262,868 | ||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
4,724 | 121,218 | ||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
7,455 | 190,817 |
(1) | The Value Realized on Vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vested by the closing price on the day immediately preceding the relevant vesting date. |
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL YEAR 2023
This table provides information about the NEOs’ earnings and balances under our NQDC Plan in fiscal year 2023 as well as Company contributions made in fiscal year 2023.
Name |
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year(1) ($) |
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year(1) ($) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(2) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
Aggregate ($)(3) |
|||||||||||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
0 | 134,958 | 65,315 | 0 | 800,181 | |||||||||||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
31,500 | 74,173 | 722,427 | 0 | 2,835,213 | |||||||||||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
439,791 | 87,275 | 190,723 | 0 | 3,168,127 | |||||||||||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
667,633 | 79,116 | 107,576 | 0 | 1,496,978 | |||||||||||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
0 | 68,194 | 67,834 | 0 | 669,485 |
(1) | All of the amounts reported in these columns are reported as fiscal year 2023 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | The NQDC Plan does not pay above-market or preferential earnings, therefore no earnings reported in this column are reported as fiscal 2023 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | The following amounts were reported in prior fiscal year summary compensation tables: $435,142, $303,274, and $1,015,966 for Ms. Tekorius and Messrs. Downes and Comstock, respectively. |
The NQDC Plan permits participants, including the NEOs, to elect to defer a portion of their compensation, including shares of stock awarded under the Company’s long-term incentive plan.
In January 2023, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary contributions equal to 6% of participants’ annual base salary earned plus actual bonus earned, in each case for the prior calendar year. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for more details regarding the NQDC Plan.
TERMINATION AND CHANGE OF CONTROL PROVISIONS
CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS
We have entered into change of control agreements with our NEOs, which provide for certain benefits if an NEO’s employment is terminated (x) by us without “cause” or due to the NEO’s “disability,” (y) by the NEO for “good reason” or (z) due to death, in each case in connection with or within 24 months after a “change of control” of the Company.
The following table shows the estimated benefits that would have been payable to the NEOs under the change of control agreements if a COC had occurred on August 31, 2023, and each NEO’s employment had been terminated on that date by us without “cause” or by the NEO for “good reason”.
2024 PROXY STATEMENT |
![]() |
39
FISCAL 2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Name |
Cash Severance Benefit(1) ($) |
Continued ($) |
Equity Award Acceleration(3) ($) |
Total ($)(4) |
||||||||||||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
4,811,790 | 19,034 | 7,157,102 | 11,987,926 | ||||||||||||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
1,595,797 | 29,127 | 1,946,482 | 3,571,405 | ||||||||||||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
2,532,421 | 25,378 | 3,665,693 | 6,223,492 | ||||||||||||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
2,295,106 | 0 | 2,335,650 | 4,630,756 | ||||||||||||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
1,474,244 | 26,981 | 2,165,112 | 3,666,336 |
(1) | The change of control agreement with each NEO provides for a payment equal to one and one half times (or two and one half times for Ms. Tekorius and two times for Messrs. Comstock and Krueger) the sum of (x) the NEO’s current base salary plus (y) the average of the two most recent annual bonuses received by the NEO prior to the year in which the COC occurs. All payments are to be made in a single lump sum. |
(2) | The change of control agreements with each of our NEOs provide that the Company will pay the cost of continued benefits for up to 18 months (or 24 months for Mr. Comstock) following the termination of employment except to the extent similar benefits are provided by a subsequent employer. The amounts in this column are based on the average monthly cost of benefits during fiscal 2023. As of fiscal end 2023, Mr. Krueger did not participate in the relevant benefit plans. |
(3) | The change of control agreements with each of our NEOs provide that time-based awards will accelerate and become fully vested, and performance-based awards will accelerate and become fully vested at target levels. The amounts in the table are based on the closing price of a share of our common stock on August 31, 2023, which was $42.56. |
(4) | The change of control agreements with each of our NEOs provide that the Company may reduce these amounts in order to prevent any payments from being non-deductible under section 280G of the Code or subject to excise tax under Code section 4999. |
The following table shows the estimated benefits that would have been payable to the NEOs under the change of control agreements if a COC had occurred on August 31, 2023, and each NEO’s employment had been terminated on that date due to death or by us due to the NEO’s disability.
Name |
Continued ($) |
|||
LORIE L. TEKORIUS |
19,034 | |||
ADRIAN J. DOWNES |
29,127 | |||
BRIAN J. COMSTOCK |
25,378 | |||
WILLIAM KRUEGER |
0 | |||
MARTIN R. BAKER |
26,981 |
(1) | The change of control agreements with each of our NEOs provide that the Company will pay the cost of continued benefits up to 18 months (or 24 months for Mr. Comstock) following the termination of employment except to the extent similar benefits are provided by a subsequent employer. As of fiscal end 2023, Mr. Krueger did not participate in the relevant benefit plans. |
A “change of control” generally includes (1) the acquisition by any individual, entity or group of 30% or more of our stock having by the terms thereof ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the Board, (2) the consummation of a merger or consolidation that results in 50% or more of our stock being owned by persons who were not shareholders prior to the transaction, (3) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, (4) the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or (5) a replacement of a majority of the members of the Board by individuals whose nomination, election or appointment was not approved by the incumbent Board.
“Cause” generally means (1) the NEO’s willful and continued failure to substantially perform the NEO’s duties with the Company (subject to certain exceptions) or (2) the conviction of the NEO (including a plea of nolo contendere) of a felony or gross misdemeanor under federal or state law which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or which impairs the NEO’s ability to substantially perform the NEO’s duties for the Company.
“Good reason” generally means (1) a material change in the NEO’s status, positions, duties or responsibility which may reasonably be considered to be an adverse change, (2) a reduction by the Company of the NEO’s base salary exceeding 5% (or an adverse change in the form or timing of the payment), (3) a reduction by the Company of the NEO’s annual bonus exceeding 20%, (4) relocation of the NEO’s work place by more than 35 miles, (5) any purported termination by the Company of the NEO’s employment except as otherwise expressly permitted by the change of control agreement, or (6) any failure by the Company to require any Company successor to assume the change of control agreement.