UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No. )
![]() |
Filed by the Registrant | ![]() |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
Check the appropriate box: | |
![]() |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
![]() |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14A-6(E)(2)) |
![]() |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
![]() |
Definitive Additional Materials |
![]() |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply): | ||
![]() |
No fee required. | |
![]() |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
![]() |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
Our Company
ArcBest is a multibillion-dollar integrated logistics company that leverages our full suite of shipping and logistics solutions to meet our customers’ supply chain needs.
With the ability to optimize, connect and deliver across various modes of transportation, we serve as a single logistics resource and help keep the global supply chain moving. This integrated approach, combined with our technology and expertise, helps ensure our customers have the right solutions to get the job done — no matter the shipment size, type of product or speed of delivery.
We started 100 years ago as a local Arkansas freight hauler. Today, through organic growth, smart strategic acquisitions, visionary leadership and a mindset focused on the future, we’re a publicly traded $5 billion logistics powerhouse with over 15,000 employees across more than 250 campuses and service centers.
ArcBest is a trusted advisor, with our customers at the center of it all. We listen, get to know their business and look at things from their perspective, so the strategies and solutions we recommend align with their goals.
Our long history of innovation enriches these deep customer relationships. We invest heavily in strategic initiatives aimed at transformation — helping shippers and capacity providers successfully navigate the complex logistics landscape. With a strong emphasis on disruptive technology and advanced analytics, we’re enabling more sustainable supply chains and delivering intelligent solutions that make it easier for our customers to achieve their objectives.
In pursuit of our mission to connect and positively impact the world through solving logistics challenges and aligned to our values-driven culture, we’re also focused on advancing Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) initiatives. We’re committed to identifying, analyzing and reporting on ESG-related data and conducting business in a way that helps create a safer, more sustainable and inclusive company and world. This includes our commitment to having a workplace that respects all cultures, perspectives and experiences so that we provide the best atmosphere for our employees and the best service to our customers.
Welcome to ArcBest.
Our Values |
Creativity |
Integrity |
Collaboration |
|||
![]() We create |
![]() We do the |
![]() We work |
||||
Growth |
Excellence |
Wellness |
||||
![]() We grow our people |
![]() We exceed |
![]() We embrace |
||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO UPDATE THE EXCULPATION PROVISION |
![]() |
arcb.com/investor-relations |
Judy R. McReynolds
ArcBest Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2023
“We started in 1923 as a small, local freight hauler, and today we are a multibillion-dollar integrated logistics powerhouse.”
![]() $5.3B |
TOTAL REVENUE IN 2022, UP 34% VS. 2021
|
![]() +46% |
INCREASE IN EARNINGS PER DILUTED SHARE VS 2021
|
Dear ArcBest Stockholders,
I am very pleased to invite you to attend the ArcBest Corporation Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 26, 2023, at 8:00 a.m. CDT. The meeting will be held in person at our corporate headquarters, 8401 McClure Drive, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72916. As we approach the Annual Meeting, I would like to provide an update on ArcBest in 2022 and where we are today.
In 2022, ArcBest achieved many financial milestones, with our second consecutive year of record-setting annual revenue and net income. We also marked one year since acquiring MoLo Solutions, which has enabled us to deliver a more seamless and enhanced truckload solution. This, in turn, has helped us provide better customer service and carrier management.
2023 marks an extraordinary milestone — our 100th anniversary. Since getting our start in 1923 as a small, local freight hauler in western Arkansas, we have evolved into a $5.3 billion-dollar integrated logistics powerhouse. With more than 15,000 employees, we develop best-in-class and innovative approaches that help keep the global supply chain moving.
ArcBest is mindful of the changing economic and industry environment, and we continue to pursue a balanced approach to capital allocation. Looking ahead, we will continue to execute on our long-term vision and strategy focused on people, technology and our integrated solutions. And we will continue to listen to our customers and view our business through their lens. With longstanding partnerships, our customers trust us to identify and provide the right solutions and help drive their business forward. We are committed to delivering for them at every turn.
With innovation at our core, we see tremendous opportunity to serve our employees, shippers and capacity providers more effectively and efficiently by leveraging technology. ArcBest invests heavily on innovation with substantial investment in strategic projects and transformative initiatives. With this focus, we are building the future of logistics technology.
Additionally, as part of our growth strategy, our team continues to focus on our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) efforts. Our industry impacts the environment, and we believe it’s our responsibility to develop solutions that help reduce that impact.
ArcBest is well positioned to continue to serve customers and create value for stockholders for the next century. We are committed to delivering on our goals and driving growth as we work toward our long-term financial targets. Our work in 2022 and beyond continues to be guided by our mission to connect and positively impact the world through solving logistics challenges.
At this year’s meeting, you will be asked to vote on five proposals listed in the enclosed Notice of Annual Meeting: I. the election of nine nominees to serve on our Board of Directors for a one-year term; II. the advisory vote to approve executive compensation; III. the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; IV. the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023; and V. the amendment of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to update the exculpation provision. Please take time to review the information on each of the proposals contained within this Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR Proposals I, II, IV and V and “1 Year” for Proposal III.
On behalf of our Board of Directors and our 15,000+ team members, thank you for your ongoing support and for being part of our journey to 100 years. I look forward to this year and all of the opportunities ahead.
Very truly yours,
At ArcBest, we continue to make progress on our environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives. In 2022, we made strides in measuring CO2 emissions, developing our philanthropy framework, and advancing spaces for diverse employee communities.
We’re proud to have earned, for the second time, Bronze medal status for our 2022 sustainability rating from EcoVadis, a sustainability intelligence provider that rates more than 100,000 companies worldwide. With criteria across four themes (Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics and Sustainable Procurement), Bronze status recognizes companies performing in the top 50% of all companies rated.
In 2022, ABF Freight System, Inc., our largest subsidiary, was named an EPA SmartWay High Performer for the 2nd consecutive year, our 3rd time to receive this designation. We have made it a priority to minimize fuel consumption and reduce emissions through operational improvements and equipment upgrades. We also continue to pilot electric yard tractors, forklifts, and Class 6 trucks to further explore emissions-reduction opportunities.
For the first time, we calculated and disclosed our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions in our ESG Report released in June 2022. We made several additional disclosures in 2022, making progress toward aligning to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards for ESG reporting and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework.
As part of our Facility Enhancement and Growth plan, we remodeled and renovated a number of facilities across the country, replacing thousands of lighting fixtures with LED and upgrading restroom fixtures. In addition to the benefits for employees, we expect these improvements to reduce our electricity and water consumption. We look forward to monitoring the results over time.
As both a facility upgrade and a step toward reducing emissions, we have nearly completed the installation of a solar power system at our Fort Wayne, IN service center. This system will produce approximately 50,000 kWh of renewable electricity each year and will serve as a pilot to explore the potential for systems at other facilities in the future.
![]() |
![]() |
3X EPA SMARTWAY HIGH PERFORMER |
SCOPE 1 AND SCOPE 2 CARBON EMISSIONS DISCLOSED FOR FIRST TIME |
In 2022, we announced three foundational philanthropy pillars to help guide our impact: community, education, and people. Through these pillars, we donated over $1 million to over 150 organizations across the country.
Within our Community pillar, we continued serving in focus areas, including the United Way of Fort Smith Area, local events — such as Paint the Park Pink, True Grit Ride and The Walk to End Alzheimer’s — and local developments. Within our Education pillar, we matched employee contributions to over 18 schools through our Educational Match Program. As a Fort Smith Partners in Education organization, employees also devote time to students through mentorship programs and STEM activities like Girls Who Code and LEGO robotics competitions. Within our People pillar, we positively impacted the world through the causes our employees care about, including the Polaris Project, Ronald McDonald House, Down Syndrome Connections, and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.
In alignment with the People pillar, the Leadership Academy Class of 2021 fundraised over $42,000 for Project Hero — a non-profit that supports rehabilitation therapy for veterans and military members through cycling. Along with this donation, employees at service centers in Dayton and South Chicago fundraised over $50,000 for the Fischer House Foundation and Canaryville Veteran Riders Association, demonstrating our continued support of veteran causes.
![]() |
![]() |
$1 MILLION DONATED TO |
ESTABLISHED 3 PHILANTHROPY PILLARS: COMMUNITY, EDUCATION AND PEOPLE |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 5
In 2022, a top priority was continuing to ensure all employees feel safe and welcome, as well as expanding our diverse talent pools. In the first quarter, we launched a DEI Task Force with employees from across the organization. This 12-member group is responsible for providing recommendations and employee feedback around DEI, as well as identifying best practices for workplace inclusivity. Based on the recommendations of this group, we highlighted several diverse holidays and heritage months internally and externally for the first time — including Juneteenth, Diwali, and Native American Heritage Month. The DEI Task Force also hosted its first events, including a New Hire Inclusion Night and a virtual Hispanic Heritage Month Panel Discussion.
Through the ArcBest Recruiting team, we attended 10 recruiting and career events at diverse campuses, including multiple Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and one Native American-serving Nontribal Institution (NASNTI). Additionally, through the Student Opportunity Center we partnered with Morgan State University, an HBCU in Baltimore, for an experiential classroom project during the fall semester.
We also began a search for a neuroinclusivity employment advisor. In October, we announced our collaboration with Integrate — a nonprofit organization that helps identify, recruit and retain professionals on the autism spectrum — to foster a neuroinclusive workforce and continue attracting the best talent with unique skill sets.
An initial employee resource group (ERG) framework was developed by the DEI Task Force, with two new groups forming at the end of 2022. The first employee-led group is focused on creating community around new hires and relocated employees (CoNECT: Colleagues Networking and Embracing Community Ties), and the second is focused on the LGBTQ+ community and allyship (Pride Network).
We also continued tracking new hire diversity. In 2022, 61% of our new hires represented one or more of the diverse backgrounds categorized by gender, race, ethnicity, and military status.
![]() |
![]() |
2 NEW ERGS FORMED |
61% OF NEW HIRE GENDER, RACE, ETHNICITY, |
Our people are at the heart of our success, and we work to ensure they have the resources and training necessary to be successful in their roles. In 2022, we provided our employees with over 680 different online course titles, totaling over 38,000 enrollments into online courses across the organization. We also offered over 400 sessions of over 100 different live course titles, via webinar or in-person, totaling over 10,000 enrollments and over 43,000 hours of live training on job skills and soft skills topics. Through our Aspiring Leaders Program, Leadership Series, and Leadership Academy, over 250 employees across the organization received instructor-guided training designed to develop skills for leadership and management.
Living true to our value of Excellence, our training team delivered over 270 hours of Quality Process content. This course ensures employees are familiar with the “5 Step Problem Elimination Process” and help us live out our vision of “We’ll Find A Way”.
ArcBest was recognized as a 2022 Training APEX award winner by Training magazine, improving year-over-year in this ranking from spot 16 to spot 14.
Our Educational Assistance Program continued supporting full-time employee development by reimbursing a percentage of the cost for educational courses. In 2022, $260,130 was reimbursed to employees pursuing graduate certificates and master’s degrees. Along with supporting employee learning, our performance and succession processes help us identify the next generation of company leaders; 249 employees were flagged as potential successor candidates for senior leadership roles.
![]() |
![]() |
43,000+ HOURS OF TRAINING |
2022 TRAINING APEX AWARD WINNER, OUR 13TH YEAR |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 6
APRIL 26, 2023 8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time
ArcBest Headquarters 8401 McClure Drive Fort Smith, Arkansas 72916 |
![]() |
NOTICE of Annual Meeting of Stockholders ArcBest Corporation |
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF ARCBEST CORPORATION:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ArcBest Corporation (“ArcBest” or the “Company”) on April 26, 2023, at 8:00 a.m. (CDT). You may attend in person at the principal offices of the Company located at 8401 McClure Drive, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72916. To obtain directions to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote in person, contact the Company’s Investor Relations Department at toll-free telephone number 800-961-9744, email address invrel@arcb.com or through the Company’s website www.arcb.com.
The annual meeting is being convened for the following purposes:
To elect nine directors for a one-year term to expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
To conduct an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
To conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of holding future advisory votes on executive compensation;
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023;
To approve amendment of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to update the exculpation provision; and
To act upon such other matters as may properly be brought before the meeting affecting the business and affairs of the Company.
By Order of the Board of Directors, March 17, 2023.
Michael Johns
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
RECORD DATE; PROXIES
Only stockholders of record at the close of business February 27, 2023, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please follow the instructions to vote by Internet or by telephone, or complete, sign, date and return your proxy card if you received one, as promptly as possible. It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting. For more information about how to attend the annual meeting, see “Information About the Meeting” on page 72 of this Proxy Statement. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a brokerage firm or bank, then your brokerage firm or bank is responsible for voting on your behalf based on your instructions. The Board of Directors urges you to contact the person responsible for your account today and instruct them to execute a proxy considering the recommendations of the Board, which are described in this Proxy Statement. If you hold your shares in street name and you wish to personally vote at the meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares. For more information on how to vote, see “Information About the Meeting.”
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on April 26, 2023: The Proxy Statement and 2022 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
If you wish to receive future proxy statements and annual reports electronically rather than receiving paper copies in the mail, please see page 74 for instructions. This approach can provide information to you more conveniently, while reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting and helping to reduce our distribution costs.
8401 MCCLURE DRIVE / P.O. BOX 10048 / FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS 72917-0048 / 479-785-6000
HOW TO VOTE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Please refer to the following proxy materials or the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which voting methods are available to you. |
BY INTERNET www.proxyvote.com |
BY PHONE 1-800-690-6903 (automated line) |
BY MAIL If you received paper copies of your proxy materials, sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided |
IN PERSON You can attend the Annual Meeting in person and vote, even if you gave a proxy in advance |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 7
THIS SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS CERTAIN INFORMATION FROM THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE INFORMATION THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER. YOU SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE PROXY STATEMENT BEFORE VOTING YOUR SHARES. FOR MORE COMPLETE INFORMATION REGARDING ARCBEST’S 2022 PERFORMANCE, PLEASE REVIEW OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022.
Annual Meeting Information
This Proxy Statement is furnished to the stockholders of the Company in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the ArcBest Board of Directors (the “Board”) to be voted at the Annual Meeting. The matters we will act upon at the Annual Meeting are:
Proposal |
Board Voting Recommendation |
Vote Required to Pass |
Where to Find More Information |
Elect nine directors for a one-year term |
FOR all nominees |
A nominee is elected by a plurality of the votes cast |
Page 12 |
Approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation |
FOR |
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote |
Page 62 |
Approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes to approve executive compensation |
For a frequency of 1 YEAR |
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote |
Page 63 |
Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023 |
FOR |
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of Common Stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote |
Page 66 |
Approve amendment of the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to update the exculpation provision |
FOR |
The affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock |
Page 68 |
![]() What’s New? |
◼
In June 2022, we published our third Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report for the calendar year 2021, disclosing our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions for the first time. Visit arcb.com/ESG to view the report.(1) ◼
We announced our three foundational philanthropy pillars to help guide our impact: Community, Education and People. Visit arcb.com/investor-relations/philanthropy to learn more about ArcBest Philanthropy. ◼
We developed robust plans to celebrate our 100th anniversary in 2023. |
(1) |
Documents referenced or hyperlinked in this proxy statement are not and will not be incorporated by reference unless expressly indicated otherwise. Such documents may contain information from various sources and our assumptions thereon and may also contain hypothetical or adverse scenarios and assumptions that may not necessarily be representative of current, actual or expected risks or results. You are cautioned not to place undue weight on such information. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 8
Name |
Occupation |
Age |
Director Since |
Independent |
Other Public Directorships |
Committees |
|||
Audit |
Compensation |
Nominating/Corporate Governance |
|||||||
Salvatore A. Abbate |
Chief Executive Officer for Veritiv Corporation |
54 |
2023 |
![]() |
1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Eduardo F. Conrado |
President for Ascension |
56 |
2016 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Fredrik J. Eliasson |
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Change Healthcare Inc. |
52 |
2019 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Michael P. Hogan |
Chief Growth and Strategy Officer for Forme Financial |
63 |
2016 |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Kathleen D. McElligott |
Former Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer for McKesson Corporation |
67 |
2015 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Judy R. McReynolds Chair |
President and Chief Executive Officer for ArcBest |
60 |
2010 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Craig E. |
Professor, Vanderbilt University |
69 |
2011 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Steven L. Spinner Lead Independent Director |
Operating Partner for MidOcean Partners |
63 |
2011 |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Janice E. |
Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Rogers Corporation |
63 |
2012 |
![]() |
1 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Member |
![]() |
Chair |
![]() |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 9
Our nine nominees represent a diverse range of skills:
Supply chains continued to be disrupted, and in 2022, many shippers depended on ArcBest’s expertise as an integrated logistics provider to help them navigate the challenges of effectively and efficiently delivering their products. With over 15,000 employees utilizing their industry knowledge while offering a breadth of solutions, ArcBest truly lived out its mission to connect and positively impact the world through solving logistics challenges. In 2022, we achieved record revenue, operating income, net income and earnings per share. We have accomplished a lot, and we are positioned to make much more progress in the future.
![]() |
$399.3M |
![]() |
$11.69 |
OPERATING INCOME, AN INCREASE OF 42% VS. 2021 |
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE, AN INCREASE OF 46% VS. 2021
|
Our executive compensation program strikes a balance between fixed and variable elements. As shown below, 80% of compensation for our CEO, and 68% of compensation (on average) for our other Named Executive Officers, was at risk in 2022.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 10
The Compensation Committee continually reviews the Company’s executive compensation program to ensure our practices promote stockholders’ best interests. Some of our key policies are summarized below.
What We Do: |
|
What We Don’t Do: |
||
![]() |
We tie pay to performance. The majority of executive pay is at risk. |
|
![]() |
NO tax gross-up payments for any amounts considered excess parachute payments. |
![]() |
We use three-year ratable vesting for our restricted stock units to encourage retention and a long-term perspective. |
|
![]() |
NO single-trigger payments upon a change in control. |
![]() |
Named Executive Officers and Directors are subject to significant stock ownership requirements. |
|
![]() |
NO excessive perquisites. |
![]() |
Half (50%) of the long-term incentive value granted to Named Executive Officers is contingent on the Company’s performance over a 3-year period. |
|
![]() |
NO hedging or pledging of Company stock. |
![]() |
We have caps on both the annual incentive and long-term incentive payouts. |
|
![]() |
NO employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers. |
![]() |
We have a robust clawback policy. |
|
![]() |
NO re-pricing of stock options without stockholder approval. |
![]() |
We conduct annual risk assessments of our compensation plans. |
|
![]() |
NO guaranteed bonuses. |
![]() |
We have an independent Compensation Committee. |
|
|
|
![]() |
The Compensation Committee has an independent compensation consultant. |
|
|
|
![]() |
We benchmark our compensation practices to peers with which we compete for talent. |
|
|
|
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 11
All of the nominees are currently serving as directors of the Company. If elected, each nominee will serve until ArcBest’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2024 or until the individual’s earlier death, resignation or removal from office. Based on a recommendation from the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the Board appointed Salvatore A. Abbate to the Board on January 30, 2023. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Abbate was recommended to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee as a potential Board candidate by Korn Ferry, which was engaged by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to assist in identifying potential Board candidates.
Each nominee has indicated a willingness to serve as a member of the Board, if elected. If, for any reason, a nominee becomes unable to serve or will not serve, either the number of the Company’s directors will be reduced or the Board will designate a substitute nominee.
The Company’s bylaws provide that directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by stockholders, in person or by proxy, at a meeting at which a quorum is present. The Company’s bylaws also require that any director in an uncontested election who does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast must promptly tender a resignation to the Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider any resignation tendered under this policy and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject it, and the Board will act on such resignation, taking into account such recommendation, within 90 days following the certification of the election results.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may consider any information it deems appropriate, including any reasons given by stockholders for their votes against a director, the qualifications of the director, and the director’s contributions to the Board and the Company. The Board will promptly disclose its decision to accept or reject the resignation and, if rejected, the reasons for doing so. If a director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board, then such director will continue to serve. If a director’s resignation is accepted by the Board, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any remaining vacancy or decrease the size of the Board.
Unless otherwise instructed or unless authority to vote is withheld, your proxy will be voted for the election of each of the nominees.
A biography of each Director nominee, current as of February 1, 2023, appears below. There are no family relationships among any of the nominees and executive officers of the Company or its subsidiaries.
SALVATORE A. ABBATE | ||
![]() Age 54
Director since: 2023
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Compensation ■
Nominating/ Corporate Governance |
Key experience ■
Sales and marketing ■
Manufacturing and process improvement ■
Logistics ■
Public company executive management ■
Strategic planning
Other directorships ■
Veritiv Corporation (Board member)
Mr. Abbate is Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Veritiv Corporation. Based in Atlanta, GA, Veritiv is a Fortune 500 company and a leading North American business-to-business distribution solutions company. Before becoming its CEO, Mr. Abbate served as Chief Operating Officer for Veritiv from January 2020 until September 2020 and as Chief Commercial Officer from April 2018 until December 2019. Prior to joining Veritiv, his leadership roles included Senior Vice President, Chief Sales & Marketing Officer for Andersen Windows & Doors, Inc. and Vice-President, Global Sales and Marketing for the performance films division of Solutia, Inc., a performance materials and specialty chemical provider which is now part of the Eastman Chemical Company. Mr. Abbate began his career at Armstrong World Industries, where he spent 15 years in all three of its business units in various roles including sales, marketing, manufacturing, and process improvement. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 12
EDUARDO F. CONRADO | ||
![]() Age 56
Director since: 2016
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Compensation ■
Nominating/ Corporate Governance (Chair) |
Key experience ■
Brand marketing ■
Corporate strategy and strategic development ■
Digital transformation ■
New business development ■
Digital and data strategy ■
Product innovation ■
Operations ■
Cybersecurity
Other directorships ■
Previously served as a director on the not-for-profit boards of Ascension, Chicago Red Cross, and The Chicago Field Museum
Mr. Conrado is President for Ascension, the nation’s largest non-profit health system. Before becoming President, Mr. Conrado was Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and Innovations Officer from July 2019 through January 2023. He joined Ascension in September 2018 as Executive Vice President and Chief Digital Officer. Before that, Mr. Conrado had a 25-year career at Motorola Solutions, Inc., a global provider of communication infrastructure, devices, accessories, software and services, serving in numerous senior executive positions, culminating in his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy & Innovation Officer from August 2015 until December 2017. Mr. Conrado’s previous roles at Motorola Solutions included Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer, Senior Vice President — Marketing & IT, Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for Global Business & Technology Marketing. He also worked in various marketing, distribution and network capacities for Motorola Solutions. |
FREDRIK J. ELIASSON | ||
![]() Age 52
Director since: 2019
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Audit |
Key experience ■
Financial and capital markets ■
Transportation and logistics ■
Sales and marketing ■
Operations ■
Mergers and acquisitions ■
Innovation and emerging technologies ■
Cost-structure transformation and revenue optimization ■
Cybersecurity
Other directorships ■
Gates Industrial Corporation plc (Audit Committee Chair) ■
Previously served on the Jacksonville (Florida) Chamber Board of Directors and as chair of the business recruiting portion of the chamber, JAXUSA Partnership ■
Previously served on the Audit Committee of United Way Jacksonville ■
Previously served as Executive Member and Finance Committee chair for the Jacksonville Zoo Board of Directors
Mr. Eliasson currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Gates Industrial Corporation plc. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Change Healthcare Inc., one of the largest independent healthcare IT companies in the United States, from 2018 to 2022. He joined Change Healthcare in 2018 after a 22-year career at CSX Corporation, where he served in various executive leadership capacities, including President in 2017, Executive Vice President and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer from 2015 to 2017, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2012 to 2015. |
MICHAEL P. HOGAN | ||
![]() Age 63
Director since: 2016
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Audit |
Key experience ■
Strategic planning ■
IT and Cybersecurity ■
Marketing and sales ■
Ecommerce ■
Multi-channel and digital business ■
Corporate governance ■
Digital products and mobile and consumer electronics products
Other directorships ■
Feed the Children, a non-profit organization (Chairman of the Board)
Mr. Hogan is the Chief Growth and Strategy Officer for Forme Financial, the first financial advisory firm created specifically to serve physicians. He previously retired as President of Tax Smart Innovation for Blucora, Inc., a provider of technology-enabled financial solutions, in June 2020. Prior to joining Blucora in October 2018, Mr. Hogan served as Executive Vice President — Strategic Business & Brand Development for GameStop Corporation from 2012 until February 2018. From 2008 until 2012, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for GameStop. Prior to 2008, Mr. Hogan served as a principal with Strategic Frameworking, a strategic consulting firm; Senior Vice President — Marketing for Dean Foods Company; and Vice President — International Marketing for Frito-Lay, Inc. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 13
KATHLEEN D. MCELLIGOTT | ||
![]() Age 67
Director since: 2015
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Compensation (Chair) ■
Nominating/ Corporate Governance |
Key experience ■
Manufacturing ■
Supply chain and distribution ■
Acquisitions and divestitures ■
Big data, cloud computing, and technology strategy ■
Cybersecurity ■
Technology ■
Transportation and enterprise logistics ■
Strategic planning
Other directorships ■
Previously served on the board of Forescout Technologies, Inc. (May 2019 to Aug. 2020) ■
Previously served as board president of Connections to Success, a St. Louis-based non-profit organization
Ms. McElligott retired in February 2020 as Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Chief Technology Officer for McKesson Corporation, a healthcare services and information technology company. She joined McKesson in July 2015, after serving as Chief Information Officer and Vice President — Information Technology for Emerson Electric Co. from February 2010 to July 2015, and Group Chief Information Officer, Industrial Automation and Vice President for Emerson Power Transmission for over nine years before that. Prior to joining Emerson, Ms. McElligott spent 22 years with General Electric Company in multiple information systems leadership and managerial roles. |
JUDY R. MCREYNOLDS | ||
![]() Age 60
Director since: 2010
Chairman of the Board since: 2016
Committees: ■
None |
Key experience ■
Significant industry-specific experience ■
Expertise with respect to both ArcBest and its transportation and logistics subsidiaries resulting from a 26-year tenure with the Company ■
Operations ■
Finance ■
Customer experience ■
Strategic planning ■
Logistics ■
Less-than-truckload and truckload transportation ■
Talent management, labor and pension ■
Investment and corporate banking, financial analysis, capital structures and shareholder value ■
ESG oversight
Other directorships ■
OGE Energy (since 2011) (Compensation Committee; Lead Director since Dec. 2020) (Compensation Committee chair, Nominating and Governance Committee, 2011 to Dec. 2020) ■
Previously served as Chair on the American Transportation Research Institute board ■
Previously served as a member of the Board and the Executive Committee for the American Trucking Associations ■
Previously served on the Transportation Industry Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Ms. McReynolds has served as ArcBest President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2010 and Chairman of the Board since April 2016. Since joining the Company in 1997, she has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; Vice President — Controller; Controller; and Director of Corporate Accounting. Ms. McReynolds is a Certified Public Accountant. |
DR. CRAIG E. PHILIP | ||
![]() Age 69
Director since: 2011
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Compensation ■
Nominating/ Corporate Governance |
Key experience ■
40-year career in the marine, rail and intermodal industries ■
Leadership experience in various modes of freight transportation ■
Industrial marketing ■
Strategic planning ■
Legal/Regulatory
Other directorships ■
Marine Board of the Transportation Research Board, a unit of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (Chairman) ■
Transportation Research Board (Resilience Section Committee)
Dr. Philip joined the faculty of Vanderbilt University, a private research university, in 2015, as Research Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering. He is the former Director of Vanderbilt Center for Transportation and Operational Resiliency (VECTOR). Dr. Philip retired as Chief Executive Officer for Ingram Barge Company, a barge company and quality marine transporter of dry cargo and one of the top chemical carriers on the river, in 2014. He was President for Ingram Barge from 1994 until 1999, when he was named Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Philip began his transportation career with Conrail in 1980, worked for Ingram Barge for five years, and briefly served as Vice President of the Intermodal Division of Southern Pacific Railroad before returning to Ingram Barge in 1991. He has also held adjunct faculty positions at Princeton University and Vanderbilt University. In 2014, Dr. Philip was elected to membership in the National Academy of Engineering. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 14
STEVEN L. SPINNER | ||
![]() Age 63
Director since: 2011
Lead Independent Director since: 2022
Committees: ■
Audit |
Key experience ■
Public company executive management ■
Logistics ■
Network business ■
Wholesale food distribution business ■
Operations ■
ESG oversight
Other directorships ■
MidOcean Partners (Private Equity Executive Board) ■
Vidafuel (Board member) ■
Boxcar Partners (Partner) ■
Previously served on the Board of Directors of United Natural Foods, Inc. (Chairman of the Board)
Mr. Spinner currently serves as an Operating Partner for MidOcean Partners, a private company offering capital solutions across private equity and credit markets. In August 2021, he became a Partner at Boxcar Partners, a multi-family office venture investment firm. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board for United Natural Foods, Inc., an independent national distributor of natural, organic and specialty foods and related products, from September 2008 to August 2021 when he retired. Prior to joining United Natural Foods in 2008, he was a Director and Chief Executive Officer for Performance Food Group Company (“PFGC”) from October 2006 to May 2008 and PFGC’s President and Chief Executive Officer for three years before that. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer for PFGC’s Broadline Division from February 2002 to May 2005, and Division President for Broadline from August 2001 to February 2002. |
JANICE E. STIPP | ||
![]() Age 63
Director since: 2012
INDEPENDENT
Committees: ■
Audit (Chair) |
Key experience ■
Financial and accounting experience with a variety of industrial companies, both public and private ■
Auditing, financial controls, financial management and accounting and treasury ■
Corporate restructuring ■
Public company executive management ■
Risk Management ■
Acquisitions
Other directorships ■
Rotork, plc (since 2020) (Nomination and Remuneration Committees; Audit Committee chair) ■
Previously served on the Board of Directors of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (Audit Committee; Nominating and Governance Committee chair) ■
Previously served on the Board of Sappi Limited (Audit Committee) ■
Previously served on the Board of Directors of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.
Ms. Stipp retired in 2018 from her role as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Rogers Corporation, a global leader in engineered materials solutions. Prior to joining Rogers Corporation in November 2015, Ms. Stipp was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Tecumseh Products Company. She has also previously served as the Chief Financial Officer for Revstone Industries LLC; Acument Global Technologies, Inc.; and GDX Automotive. Ms. Stipp began her career in 1981 with Lear Siegler Incorporated, working in corporate audit. From 1984 to 1999, she worked for General Motors Corp. in a variety of financial roles. She is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Global Management Accountant. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 15
We believe the Board’s membership should represent a diversity of backgrounds, experiences and skills. To that end, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has established a matrix, outlining the skills and experiences they believe are most relevant for the Company. This matrix is periodically reviewed by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and updated as necessary.
Expertise/Qualification |
Abbate |
Conrado |
Eliasson |
Hogan |
McElligott |
McReynolds |
Philip |
Spinner |
Stipp |
Acquisitions |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Audit |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Corporate Governance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Current CEO/CFO |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Cybersecurity |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Entrepreneurial Experience |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Environmental, Social & Governance |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Executive Compensation |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
HR/Labor |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
International |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Investment Banking/Finance/Private Equity |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Legal/Regulatory/Gov’t Relations |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Marketing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Other Public Company Board/Management |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Other Transportation Related Board/ Management |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Risk Management |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Strategic Planning |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Technology |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Transportation/Logistics |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 16
The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our Board members and nominees as of January 30, 2023. Each of the categories listed in the tables below has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).
BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX (AS OF JANUARY 30, 2023) |
||
Total Number of Directors |
9 |
|
|
Female |
Male |
Part I: Gender Identity |
||
Directors |
3 |
6 |
Part II: Demographic Background |
||
Hispanic or Latinx |
- |
1 |
White |
3 |
5 |
BOARD DIVERSITY MATRIX (AS OF JANUARY 17, 2022) |
||
Total Number of Directors |
9 |
|
|
Female |
Male |
Part I: Gender Identity |
||
Directors |
3 |
6 |
Part II: Demographic Background |
||
Hispanic or Latinx |
- |
1 |
White |
3 |
5 |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 17
The Board has determined that a leadership structure with Ms. McReynolds serving in a combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer role and an independent director serving as the Lead Independent Director is in the best interests of ArcBest and its stockholders.
The Board recognizes that there are many viewpoints concerning a board’s optimal leadership structure and considered all options in making its decision. The Board reviewed trends in board practices, recommended best practices for corporate governance, and the board practices of the Company’s peers. The Board also considered the advantages of having a combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Among other things, a person serving in this combined role can quickly identify company concerns and communicate this information to other Board members, providing superior information due to his or her unique insights into the Company’s day-to-day operations.
In deciding to adopt the current leadership structure, the Board considered Ms. McReynolds’ leadership qualities, management capability, and knowledge of ArcBest’s business and the transportation and logistics industry; the long-term, strategic perspective she has exhibited as the President and Chief Executive Officer; and her focus on growing long-term shareholder value. The Board also considered Ms. McReynolds’ tenure with the Company. The Board believes that serving as both Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer enables Ms. McReynolds to more effectively and efficiently execute the Company’s strategic initiatives and respond to key business issues and risks that she encounters in daily operations.
The Board believes that an executive Chairman should be balanced by a strong Lead Independent Director with a clearly defined and dynamic leadership role in the governance of the Board. The Company’s bylaws provide that if the Chairman is not an independent Director, the independent Directors must annually elect a Lead Independent Director. The bylaws assign to the Lead Independent Director extensive authority and responsibilities relating to the Board’s governance and functions, including:
calling and chairing meetings of independent Directors, and setting agendas for such meetings;
liaising between the independent Directors and the Chairman and communicating with the Chairman after each meeting of independent Directors to provide feedback;
chairing all Board meetings where the Chairman is not present;
reviewing, advising on, and approving Board meeting agendas and meeting schedules;
being available for consultation and direct communication with stockholders, when appropriate; and
participating in the annual performance evaluation of individual members of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer (in consultation with the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee).
The Lead Independent Director’s authority and responsibilities generally correspond to those performed by an independent Chairman.
Effective January 1, 2022, the Board elected Stephen E. Gorman to serve as Lead Independent Director, replacing Mr. Spinner who had served as the Lead Independent Director since 2016. On August 5, 2022, Mr. Gorman resigned from the Board. Accordingly, the Board replaced Mr. Gorman as Lead Independent Director with Mr. Spinner in October 2022. In the Board’s view, Mr. Spinner possesses the characteristics and qualities necessary to fulfill the Lead Independent Director’s important role of guiding and facilitating the independent Directors’ participation in the Company’s governance. During his more than 11 years on our Board, and previous experience serving as Lead Independent Director, Mr. Spinner has demonstrated a thorough understanding of the Board’s oversight role and leading corporate governance practices. Supplementing the Lead Independent Director are Board committees composed entirely of independent Directors.
The Company’s leadership structure includes an experienced management team, upon whose advice, reports and opinions the Board relies. Regularly scheduled management reports and presentations, based on operational, financial, talent, legal and risk management aspects of the Company’s operations, provide vital information to the Board. The independent Directors have complete access to, and direct contact with, members of senior management. The Board also relies on the advice of counsel, accountants, executive compensation consultants, auditors, strategic planning consultants, risk management consultants, and other expert advisors.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 18
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has determined that all members of the Board except Ms. McReynolds are independent pursuant to applicable independence standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). The independent Directors met in executive session four times in 2022. Mr. Gorman, as Lead Independent Director, presided over three of those meetings, and following Mr. Gorman’s departure, Mr. Spinner, as Lead Independent Director, presided over one of those meetings.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending potential Board members based on any specific criteria the Board may specify from time to time and such other factors as it deems appropriate. Relevant considerations include:
special training or skill
experience with businesses and other organizations that are similar to the Company in size and type
experience with or knowledge of businesses or organizations or technical expertise that is particularly relevant to the Company’s current or future business plans
financial expertise
advanced studies and certifications
specific industry or transportation experience
personal characteristics that bring diversity to the Board
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also considers the interplay of a candidate’s experience with the experience of the other Directors, whether the candidate has sufficient time to devote to the responsibilities of a director, and whether the candidate is free from conflicts of interest or legal issues. There is currently no set of specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee recommended by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, as different factors may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times, and the needs of the Board may vary in light of its composition and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s perceptions about future issues and needs. However, the Board has found the skills and experiences described above under “Board Skills Profile” to be particularly relevant and desirable.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believes that to best evaluate matters the Board oversees, the Board needs a mix of business and personal backgrounds. For that reason, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews a listing of the qualifications and attributes of our current Directors and potential candidates. While the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy on diversity with regard to consideration of director nominees, diversity is taken into account when determining how a candidate’s qualities and attributes would complement the other Directors’ backgrounds.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may identify potential candidates from the pool of individuals known by members of the Board and individuals recommended by management, and/or engage a third party search firm to help identify appropriate candidates.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Recommendations should be sent to the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee at the address provided in the section of this Proxy Statement titled “Stockholder Communication with the Board”. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific policy regarding the consideration of stockholder recommendations for director candidates because the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee would evaluate stockholder recommendations in the same manner as it evaluates director candidates recommended by other sources, using the process and criteria described above.
The Board believes the Company’s current management structure facilitates risk oversight by combining experienced leadership with independent review by the Board and its committees. Potential risk factors that are monitored through this structure include financial, operational, technological, disaster, environmental, social, cybersecurity, talent, legal and regulatory, fraud/corruption, employment practices, executive compensation, and reputational and legislative issues. Management periodically makes presentations to the Board on the Company’s overall enterprise risk management program, including reports on the Company’s top existing risks, how the risks have been trending, and how they are addressed by Company strategy; mitigating activities; emerging risks and circumstances; and the effectiveness of the security, back-up, and contingency provisions of the Company’s information systems. The Board’s committees assist with risk oversight within their respective areas of responsibility, and the Board is regularly informed about each committee’s activities.
The Audit Committee directly oversees risk management relating to financial reporting and public disclosure and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of general financial risk matters, significant risk
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 19
exposures, including cybersecurity and ESG-related risks, and the Company’s policies for risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee meets regularly with financial management, including the Chief Financial Officer, the Vice President–Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, and the Vice President–Internal Audit, as well as our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviews the activities of the Company’s Risk Management Committee, which consists of several members of senior management.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight of risk relating to the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees and officers. Management has evaluated those policies and practices, including our incentive plans, and determined they do not create any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Compensation Risk Assessment.”
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing risks associated with corporate governance, social and environmental issues, and the Company’s CEO succession process. In connection with this responsibility, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and their implementation and oversees our ESG strategy, practices and policies.
The Board ensures that ArcBest has a strong bench of well-prepared internal candidates, who align with the defined leadership competencies but have diverse strengths, to fill both planned and unplanned vacancies with limited disruption. Another critical part of the succession planning strategy is the executive team’s regular, data-driven review of the organizational structure, retention, culture, compensation, and talent development practices that support the execution of ArcBest’s strategic business goals. The Board, Talent Review Committee and Management share responsibility for management development and succession planning.
A key responsibility of the Board is succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer, including identification and evaluation of potential successors. The Board also annually reviews succession planning for executive officers, including successor strengths and development opportunities and strategic talent metrics.
This committee, led by the CEO and primarily composed of the CEO’s direct reports, conducts annual reviews of succession plans for critical roles, as well as strategic talent data, with a focus on maintaining a values-driven culture in which career development for current and future leaders is critical to driving employee and organizational growth.
The Chief Human Resources Officer and senior Human Resources leaders work with functional leaders across ArcBest in developing and implementing programs to attract, assess, develop, engage, and retain leaders at all levels of the organization.
The Board has established Audit, Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance, and Qualified Legal Compliance Committees to devote attention to specific subjects and to assist in the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees are described below. The charters for all four committees are available on our website, arcb.com, in the “Invest—Corporate Governance” section.
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
||
Ms. Stipp (Chair), and
Meetings in 2022: 6 |
The Audit Committee assists the Board by fulfilling oversight responsibilities relating to: |
|
◼
the integrity of financial reports and related financial information provided by the Company to the public and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); ◼
the Company’s systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and compliance with policies, including ethics policies; ◼
the performance of the Company’s internal audit, accounting and financial reporting functions; ◼
the Company’s risk management policies and processes for identifying, monitoring, and managing significant risk exposures; and ◼
the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
||
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets all applicable SEC and Nasdaq independence standards and financial literacy requirements that apply to audit committee members. The Board has determined that Ms. Stipp, Mr. Hogan and Mr. Eliasson are audit committee financial experts as defined under applicable SEC rules. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 20
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
||
Ms. McElligott (Chair),
Meetings in 2022: 5 |
The Compensation Committee is responsible for: |
|
◼
reviewing and approving executive officer compensation and has authority to make and administer employee awards under the ArcBest Corporation Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Plan and the Amended and Restated ArcBest Corporation Ownership Incentive Plan (the “Ownership Incentive Plan”), including setting performance goals and determining the extent to which those goals were achieved; ◼
reviewing and approving the Company’s peer group; ◼
evaluating the need for, and provisions of, contracts and severance arrangements for executive officers; ◼
monitoring compliance by Executive Officers with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines; and ◼
overseeing the Company’s anti-hedging/pledging policy and the Company’s clawback policy. |
||
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets applicable Nasdaq independence standards and non-employee director requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). |
NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
||
Mr. Conrado Mr. Abbate, and Dr. Philip
Meetings in 2022: 5 |
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include: |
|
◼
identifying individuals believed to be qualified to become Directors; ◼
selecting and recommending to the Board for its approval the nominees to stand for election as Directors or, if applicable, to be appointed to fill vacancies on the Board; ◼
determining appropriate compensation for Directors; ◼
recommending any changes regarding size, structure, composition, processes and practices of the Board; ◼
reviewing the independence of Directors and assessing whether members are meeting the applicable independence standards for service on the various Board committees; ◼
working with the Board to identify, evaluate and make recommendations regarding potential successors for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; ◼
reviewing the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines; ◼
providing oversight with respect to the Company’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) strategy, practices, and policies and as appropriate provide updates and make recommendations to the Board; ◼
monitoring emerging trends, best practices and regulatory developments related to ESG matters; ◼
overseeing the annual Board evaluation and CEO evaluation. |
||
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has determined that each member of the committee is independent, as defined in applicable Nasdaq independence standards. |
QUALIFIED LEGAL COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE |
||
Ms. Stipp (Chair), and Messrs. Eliasson, Hogan, and |
The Qualified Legal Compliance Committee is responsible for confidentially receiving, retaining and considering any report of evidence of a material violation of securities law, a material breach of fiduciary duty, or a similar material violation of any federal or state law by the Company or by any officer, director, employee or agent of the Company that is made or referred to the Committee by the Chief Executive Officer or the Company’s chief legal officer or legal advisors. The Audit Committee serves as the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee. |
The Board has five regularly scheduled meetings each year to review significant developments affecting the Company and to act on matters requiring Board approval. The Board holds special meetings when action is required between regular meetings. The Board met six times during 2022. Eight members of the Board participated in 100%, and one member participated in 87.5%, of all regularly scheduled Board and applicable committee meetings held during the year.
It is the Company’s policy that all members of the Board attend the annual meeting of its stockholders, except when illness or other personal matters prevent such attendance. All members of the Board attended the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The Board has imposed a mandatory retirement age for all Directors. No Director may seek re-election to the Board after attaining age 75. Because we recognize the commitment of time and energy that a public company board requires, no Director is permitted to serve on the boards of more than two other public companies while serving on the ArcBest Board, unless he or she has obtained approval from the ArcBest Board.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 21
The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies broadly to all Directors, officers, employees, representatives, agents, sub-contractors, vendors, and suppliers of the Company. The Code of Conduct incorporates the UN Global Compact’s ten principles in the areas of human rights, labor, the environment and anti-corruption.
The Company intends to post on its website any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Controller, or any person performing similar functions and that relates to any of the following elements of the Code of Conduct: honest and ethical conduct; disclosure in reports or documents filed with the SEC and other public communications; compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations; prompt internal reporting of code violations; and accountability for adherence to the Code of Conduct.
Acting on the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the Board developed and adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the functioning of the Board and its committees and to set forth a common set of expectations as to how the Board should fulfill its responsibilities. Among other things, the Corporate Governance Guidelines address the composition of the Board, including independence standards; the selection, term and expectations for Directors; the conduct of meetings and executive sessions; and the composition and primary objectives of the Board’s committees.
The full texts of the Code of Conduct and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted in the Investors section of the Company’s website, arcb.com.
Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, requires that the Company disclose certain “related party transactions” with the Company’s Directors and executive officers, among others. There were no commercial transactions between related parties and the Company that required disclosure in this Proxy Statement.
Annually, as part of the Company’s proxy preparation, all Directors and executive officers who are subject to related party transaction disclosure are instructed to report in writing any such transactions to the Company, and to report to the Company any such transactions that may be planned or that occur during the year. As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, in determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the Audit Committee considers all the relevant facts and circumstances available, including (if applicable): (i) whether there is an appropriate business justification for the transaction; (ii) the benefits that accrue to the Company as a result of the transaction; (iii) the terms available to unrelated third parties entering into similar transactions; (iv) the impact of the transaction on a director’s independence (in the event the related party is a director, an immediate family member of a director, or an entity of which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer); (v) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (vi) whether it is a single transaction or a series of ongoing, related transactions; and (vii) whether entering into the transaction would be consistent with the Company’s Code of Conduct.
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with the members of its Board. Under these agreements, the Company is obligated to indemnify its Directors to the fullest extent permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law for expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding arising out of their services as a Director. The Company believes that these agreements are helpful in attracting and retaining qualified Directors. The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the bylaws also provide for indemnification of the Company’s officers and Directors to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 22
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and awarding compensation to the non-employee Directors and has retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC, an independent compensation consultant, to assist in fulfilling that responsibility. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee sets the levels and forms of non-employee Director compensation based on its experience, review of the compensation paid to directors of comparable publicly traded companies, and Meridian’s advice.
We offer a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board.
In January 2022, Meridian conducted a review of director compensation, including compensation paid to directors of the Company’s executive compensation peer group as well as compensation paid to directors of similarly sized general industry companies. Following this review, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee increased the member annual retainer from $80,000 to $85,000, the lead independent director annual retainer from $25,000 to $30,000, the Compensation Committee Chair annual retainer from $15,000 to $20,000 and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair annual retainer from $10,000 to $15,000. The increases were made based on a review of the 50th percentile of our peer group and similarly sized general industry companies.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee moved the timing of its next annual review of Director compensation from January to October. Meridian conducted an updated study in October 2022, and no further changes were made to the program for 2023.
The following table shows the standard cash compensation for non-employee Directors for 2022. Retainers are cumulative, meaning that each non-employee Director receives a “Member Retainer” plus the appropriate retainer fee for any other positions held.
Annual Retainers (Paid in Monthly Installments) |
|
|
Members |
$ |
85,000 |
Lead Independent Director |
|
30,000 |
Audit Committee Chair |
|
25,000 |
Compensation Committee Chair |
|
20,000 |
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair |
|
15,000 |
Actual cash compensation paid to Directors in 2022 is reflected in the “2022 Director Compensation Table.”
The target equity grant value for non-employee Directors in 2022 was increased from $110,000 to $125,000 based on a review of the 50th percentile of our peer group and similarly sized general industry companies. Awards were made in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) in an amount determined by dividing the target grant value by the closing price of ArcBest Common Stock on the date of grant and rounding to the nearest hundred shares. Equity grants for the non-employee Directors typically are approved during the Board’s second-quarter meeting with an effective grant date that is five business days following the Company’s quarterly earnings release, unless a different date is approved by the Board.
RSU awards granted to non-employee Directors vest one year from the date of grant. All of the RSU awards are subject to accelerated vesting in the event of a Director’s death or disability or a change in control of the Company. Accelerated vesting for RSUs also occurs when a Director attains normal retirement eligibility (i.e., age 65 with five years of service as a Director). Ms. McElligott and Dr. Philip are currently eligible for normal retirement. A Director who attains early retirement eligibility (i.e., three years of service as a Director) is eligible for accelerated vesting of a pro rata number of shares based on the number of whole months since the award date. Ms. Stipp and Messrs. Conrado, Eliasson, Hogan and Spinner are currently eligible for early retirement.
Vested RSU awards are paid in shares of ArcBest Common Stock on the earlier to occur of the normal vesting date applicable to the award or the Director’s termination of service with the Company unless payment is deferred by the Director under the provisions of the Ownership Incentive Plan.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 23
We typically provide transportation for Directors to attend Board meetings, pay for their hotel stays, and provide meals. Upon request, we may reimburse some or all of the cost of an educational conference and related travel.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believes that the Directors should maintain a level of equity holdings in the Company that will further align their interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Board adopted a Stock Ownership Policy requiring Directors to own a minimum value of stock in the Company. For 2022, Directors were required to own shares with a total value equal to five times their total annual retainers. Directors are not permitted to sell any shares of Company stock (except to pay the taxes generated as a result of the vesting of equity grants) until they satisfy the stock ownership requirement, and then may only sell the shares that exceed the stock ownership requirement. RSUs (including unvested RSUs and RSUs that have vested but are deferred or subject to transfer restrictions) and stock owned outright count toward the stock ownership requirements.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee reviews ownership levels annually. As of the review completed in 2022, all of the Directors have met their ownership requirements.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 24
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to non-employee Directors for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Name(1) |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
Stock
Awards (2, 3) |
|
All Other Compensation |
Total |
||||
Eduardo F. Conrado(5) |
$ |
100,000 |
$ |
126,848 |
|
$ |
- |
$ |
226,848 |
Fredrik J. Eliasson |
|
85,000 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
211,848 |
Stephen E. Gorman(4) |
|
68,320 |
|
126,848 |
(6) |
|
- |
|
195,168 |
Michael P. Hogan |
|
85,000 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
211,848 |
Kathleen D. McElligott(5) |
|
105,000 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
231,848 |
Craig E. Philip |
|
85,000 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
211,848 |
Steven L. Spinner(4) |
|
92,500 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
219,348 |
Janice E. Stipp(5) |
|
110,000 |
|
126,848 |
|
|
- |
|
236,848 |
(1)
Judy R. McReynolds, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not included in this table since she is an employee of the Company and thus received no compensation for her service as a Director. The compensation received by Ms. McReynolds as an officer of the Company is shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 42. (2)
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards made during 2022, computed using the grant date fair value ($79.28 per share), in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) determined without regard to estimated forfeitures and adjusted for present value of dividends (to reflect that dividend equivalents are not paid with respect to unvested RSU awards). All non-employee Directors received an award of 1,600 RSUs under the Ownership Incentive Plan on May 6, 2022 (computed using a stated annual value of $125,000 and the grant date closing stock price of $79.75 per share). No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid to non-employee Directors on RSUs, except for RSUs that vest but are deferred by the Director under the terms of the plan. See Note L to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report for additional detail on share-based compensation. (3)
As of December 31, 2022, each non-employee Director had the following aggregate number of RSUs outstanding, although only the value of the 2022 RSU award is provided in the Stock Awards column, above. |
Name |
Vested but Subject to Transfer Restrictions(i) |
Unvested |
Total RSUs Outstanding |
Eduardo F. Conrado |
18,833 |
667 |
19,500 |
Fredrik J. Eliasson |
2,233 |
667 |
2,900 |
Stephen E. Gorman |
- |
- |
- |
Michael P. Hogan |
7,133 |
667 |
7,800 |
Kathleen D. McElligott |
8,300 |
- |
8,300 |
Craig E. Philip |
1,600 |
- |
1,600 |
Steven L. Spinner |
933 |
667 |
1,600 |
Janice E. Stipp |
933 |
667 |
1,600 |
(i)
The balance in the Vested but Subject to Transfer Restrictions column includes shares deferred under the terms of the equity plan. |
(4)
Lead Independent Directors during 2022: Mr. Gorman and Mr. Spinner. Following Mr. Gorman’s resignation from the Board in August, Mr. Spinner was appointed as Lead Independent Director in October. Accordingly, their fees were prorated to reflect their terms during the year as Lead Independent Director. (5)
Committee Chairpersons during 2022: Ms. Stipp, Audit Committee and Qualified Legal Compliance Committee; Ms. McElligott, Compensation Committee; and Mr. Conrado, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. (6)
As a result of Mr. Gorman’s departure from the Board in August 2022, his stock award was settled in September under the terms of the Ownership Incentive Plan. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 25
We would like to introduce the current executive officers of the Company and its subsidiary, ABF Freight System, Inc. There are no family relationships among Directors and executive officers of the Company or its subsidiaries.
![]() |
JUDY R. MCREYNOLDS, age 60, is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company. Her full biography appears above under “Directors of the Company.” |
![]() |
DENNIS L. ANDERSON II, age 42, was named Chief Strategy Officer in March 2023, after serving as Chief Customer Officer from April 2020 to March 2023. Prior to that, he was Chief Customer Experience Officer from January 2017 through March 2020. Mr. Anderson was Vice President — Strategy from February 2014 through December 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Anderson served as Director of Strategy from June 2011 through January 2014. For ABF Freight, Mr. Anderson was Senior Pricing Analyst for three years and Manager of Pricing after that. He holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the University of Arkansas. |
![]() |
DAVID R. COBB, age 57, has been Chief Financial Officer since January 2015. He previously served as Vice President and Controller for over eight years, and Chief Accounting Officer for four years. Before joining the Company, Mr. Cobb was employed by Smith International, Inc., a publicly traded international oilfield service company acquired by Schlumberger Limited, as Vice President and Controller for four years; by Kent Electronics Corporation, a publicly traded specialty electronics distributor and network integrator, for six years; and by Price Waterhouse, a predecessor of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for seven years. Mr. Cobb is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Cobb holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from Abilene Christian University. |
![]() |
ERIN K. GATTIS, age 49, has been Chief Human Resources Officer since July 2016. She previously served as Vice President — Human Resources from October 2011 through June 2016, Chief of Staff from January 2010 through September 2011, and Manager of Retirement Services & Executive Compensation from August 2006 through December 2009. She joined the Company in 1999 and between 1999 and 2006 worked for both the Company and ABF Freight as a Retirement Specialist, Benefits Analyst, Supervisor of Executive Compensation and Manager of Executive Compensation. She holds a bachelor’s degree in economics and finance from Arkansas Tech University. Ms. Gattis has a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) and SHRM–SCP certification. |
![]() |
MICHAEL R. JOHNS, age 64, has been Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 2023, a title he assumed after serving as Vice President — General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from April 2007 to December 2022. For sixteen years before joining the Company, he was a partner in the law firm of Dover Dixon Horne PLLC in Little Rock, Arkansas. Mr. Johns was a practicing attorney in two other Little Rock law firms for seven years, including Rose Law Firm, prior to 1991. He is a member of the American Bar Association, Sebastian County Bar Association, and Arkansas Society of Certified Public Accountants. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Arkansas and a law degree from Southern Methodist University. |
![]() |
STEVEN LEONARD, age 48, was named Chief Commercial Officer and President, Asset-Light Logistics in March 2023, after serving as Chief Sales and Customer Engagement Officer from April 2020 to March 2023. Mr. Leonard previously served as Vice President — Customer Solutions from January 2017 through March 2020. He previously served as Vice President — Global Forwarding for the Company’s subsidiary, Panther Premium Logistics®, from November 2014 through December 2016. Mr. Leonard joined the Company in 2001 as a quotation analyst for ArcBest brand U-Pack®, and has held positions that include Manager of Quotation Services, Manager of TimeKeeper Pricing, Director of Strategic Planning, and Divisional Vice President. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Arkansas. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 26
![]() |
DANIEL E. LOE, age 48, has been Chief Yield Officer since January 2017. He also served as President, Asset-Light Logistics from September 2020 to March 2023. Mr. Loe previously served as Vice President — Enterprise Customer Solutions from May 2014 through December 2016. From 2010 through April 2014, Mr. Loe served as Vice President — Yield Management for ABF Freight. He previously served ABF Freight as Director of Marketing & Public Relations for six years, and Senior Pricing Analyst for four years. Mr. Loe joined the Company in 1997, working as an analyst in the Pricing Department. He holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from the University of Arkansas. |
![]() |
MICHAEL E. NEWCITY, age 53, has been Senior Vice President — Chief Innovation Officer for the Company, and President of the Company’s subsidiary ArcBest Technologies, Inc., since January 2015. He previously served the Company as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Information Officer from August 2013 through December 2014, Vice President — Chief Financial Officer from June 2010 through July 2013, and Director — Economic Analysis from November 2007 through May 2010. Prior to that he served as Director — E-Systems & Emerging Technologies for ABF Freight for two years, and in several managerial positions with ABF Freight that spanned marketing, information technology and business development for over five years. He began his career with the Company in 1993 at its subsidiary, ArcBest Technologies, Inc., leading e-commerce development initiatives for six years. Mr. Newcity holds a bachelor’s degree in computer information systems from the University of Arkansas and a master’s degree from the Walton College at the University of Arkansas. |
![]() |
SETH RUNSER, age 38, has been President of ABF Freight since July 2021. He previously served the Company as ABF Vice President — Linehaul Operations from August 2019 to February 2021 and as Chief Operating Officer from February through June 2021. Prior to that he served as Regional Vice President — Operations from March 2016 to July 2019. Mr. Runser joined the company in 2007, as a management trainee and served in various roles including operations supervisor, regional training specialist and service center manager prior to his promotion to Regional Vice President — Operations in 2016. Mr. Runser is an Arkansas Trucking Association board member and holds a bachelor’s degree in marketing from Kent State University. |
![]() |
JASON PARKS, age 43, has been Vice President — Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since March 2023. Prior to assuming his current role, Mr. Parks served as Assistant Corporate Controller beginning in June 2018. He joined the Company in 2014 as Senior Manager — Corporate Accounting. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Parks was employed for nine years with Ernst & Young, LLP. He holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Arkansas-Fort Smith and is a licensed CPA in the state of Arkansas. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 27
This Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation programs and the compensation decisions made during the year regarding our Named Executive Officers. The Board’s Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee” or “Committee”) determines compensation and reviews, approves, and oversees the administration of plans and programs for our Named Executive Officers. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the compensation tables and narrative disclosures that begin on page 42.
The Named Executive Officers for 2022 were:
JUDY R. MCREYNOLDS |
DAVID R. COBB |
MICHAEL E. NEWCITY |
SETH RUNSER |
DANIEL E. LOE |
DENNIS L. ANDERSON II |
ArcBest Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
ArcBest Chief Financial Officer |
ArcBest Senior Vice President — Chief Innovation Officer and ArcBest Technologies President |
ABF Freight |
Chief Yield Officer |
Chief
Strategy |
Due to the minimal differences in compensation between Messrs. Loe and Anderson, the Company determined to voluntarily include both officers as named executive officers.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 28
The table below summarizes our key 2022 and 2021 financial results.
Supply chain challenges continued in 2022, but we remained dedicated to and focused on our customers. Throughout the pandemic, our team navigated enormous amounts of change and pressures in the market to deliver for our customers and drive our business forward. With a spirit of innovation, we continuously analyze emerging technologies and collaborate with partners to actively support our customers’ success. Our rich history of delivering innovative solutions that make it easier for customers to do business is central to our ongoing strategy. Providing best-in-class customer experience and leading-edge solutions would not be possible without our people, who are at the heart of our success. The talent, character and hard work of our employees enabled us to turn challenges into opportunities and have another record-breaking year in 2022. Our laser focus on our customers, our people and technology has allowed us to provide long-term, sustainable value for our shareholders.
In 2022, we achieve our highest ever consolidated revenue at $5.3 billion for the year, an increase of 34% over 2021. We also achieved record net income and diluted earnings per share. Revenues of our Asset-Based segment reached $3 billion and revenues of our Asset-Light operations exceeded $2 billion for the first time in Company history. Our operating ratio, which is expressed as a percentage of revenues, was 92.5% — an improvement of 0.4 percentage points over our previous record operating results in 2021. Our revenue growth in 2022 reflects the acquired operations of MoLo, combined with strong customer demand and a solid market pricing environment. Our improved results also reflect revenue optimization initiatives, improvements in network efficiency and delivering integrated solutions to meet our customers’ needs in a changing freight market.
Our executive compensation program provides a strong relationship between pay and Company performance. For example, the annual cash incentive for 2022 was based on operating income (adjusted) (“Adjusted Operating Income”) and Return on Capital Employed (adjusted) (“Adjusted ROCE”). As outlined further in “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation” on the following pages, Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted ROCE both exceeded the maximum performance amounts in 2022, resulting in a maximum payout of 250% of the target incentive opportunity and an increase in total cash compensation for our Named Executive Officers in 2022 compared to 2021.
Our performance over the long term also reflects the strong pay-for-performance structure of our incentive compensation program for our executives. The 2020-2022 cash long-term incentive compensation plan (“C-LTIP”) was based on Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) compared to our peer group and pre-established Adjusted ROCE goals. Actual Company performance generated a maximum payout of 250% of the target incentive opportunity under the 2020-2022 plan, as outlined further below in “Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” The RSU awards granted in 2017 (the “2017 RSU awards”) and in 2018 (the “2018 RSU awards”) fully vested and settled on May 12, 2022, and August 1, 2022, respectively. The vesting parameters for these awards are described in our Proxy Statements for the 2018 and 2019 Annual Meetings of Stockholders filed with the SEC on March 22, 2018, and March 8, 2019, respectively.
For more information regarding our pay-for-performance philosophy, we encourage you to review the remainder of our CD&A, including the section titled “Compensation Philosophy and Objectives,” as well as our new “Pay Versus Performance” table on page 57, which we are providing as required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 29
The primary elements of direct compensation awarded to the Named Executive Officers are shown below.
|
Compensation Element |
How Paid |
Features |
For More Information |
FIXED |
Base salary |
Cash |
Reviewed annually and reflects executive’s experience, the scope and complexity of the executive’s position, current objectives and responsibilities, internal equity, the executive’s performance, retention needs, and market factors |
Page 33 |
AT RISK (variable) |
Annual incentive (AIP) |
Cash |
Based on annual goals for Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted ROCE, weighted equally |
Page 34 |
AT RISK (variable)
|
Long-term incentive |
C-LTIP (50% of target) |
Based on three-year goals for Adjusted ROCE and relative TSR, weighted equally |
Page 36 |
Time-vested RSUs (50% of target) |
Vest pro-rata over three years following grant date |
Page 37 |
The Compensation Committee continually reviews the Company’s executive compensation program to ensure our practices promote stockholders’ best interests. Some of our key policies are summarized below.
What We Do: |
|
What We Don’t Do: |
||
![]() |
We tie pay to performance. The majority of executive pay is at risk. |
|
![]() |
NO tax gross-up payments for any amounts considered excess parachute payments. |
![]() |
We use three-year ratable vesting for our restricted stock units to encourage retention and a long-term perspective. |
|
![]() |
NO single-trigger payments upon a change in control. |
![]() |
Named Executive Officers and Directors are subject to significant stock ownership requirements. |
|
![]() |
NO excessive perquisites. |
![]() |
Half (50%) of the long-term incentive value granted to Named Executive Officers is contingent on the Company’s performance over a 3-year period. |
|
![]() |
NO hedging or pledging of Company stock. |
![]() |
We have caps on both the annual incentive and long-term incentive payouts. |
|
![]() |
NO employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers. |
![]() |
We have a robust clawback policy. |
|
![]() |
NO re-pricing of stock options without stockholder approval. |
![]() |
We conduct annual risk assessments of our compensation plans. |
|
![]() |
NO guaranteed bonuses. |
![]() |
We have an independent Compensation Committee. |
|
|
|
![]() |
The Compensation Committee has an independent compensation consultant. |
|
|
|
![]() |
We benchmark our compensation practices to peers with which we compete for talent. |
|
|
|
The primary objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are to:
attract and retain highly qualified executives;
motivate the Company’s leaders to work together as a team to deliver superior business performance;
encourage balance between short-term results and the long-term strategic decisions needed to ensure sustained business performance over time; and
ensure that the interests and risk tolerance of the Company’s leaders are closely aligned with those of our stockholders.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 30
As discussed in the sections that follow, we use a variety of compensation vehicles to reflect this compensation philosophy and meet the Company’s objectives. The Compensation Committee does not prescribe a targeted allocation for the various compensation components. Both internal and external influences on our compensation program fluctuate periodically, and we believe it is in the best interest of the Company, our stockholders, and the Named Executive Officers for the Committee to have the flexibility to design a compensation program appropriate to the current market environment and the Company’s goals.
Our compensation program is designed to retain and secure the continued leadership of our existing managerial talent as well as to attract future leaders for the Company. Each Named Executive Officer is a long-term employee of the Company, with tenures ranging from 15 to 29 years, resulting in a management team that is very knowledgeable about the Company and the transportation industry. This experience is extremely valuable, and our executives can be targets for recruitment by other companies, especially in the transportation and logistics industry. Other factors we consider when determining executive compensation include scope and complexity of the position, current objectives and responsibilities, internal equity, relative compensation within the peer group, and the executive’s performance.
One of the primary considerations in implementing our compensation philosophy and objectives is striking the proper balance between fixed and at-risk (variable) compensation. Fixed compensation ensures that an executive receives a minimum level of pay irrespective of Company performance, which is important for retention and risk reduction. Variable compensation ties the executive’s compensation to Company performance, aligning the executive’s interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The following charts show the significant portion of the Named Executive Officers’ 2022 target compensation that was at risk and based on either reaching certain performance goals or the value of the Company’s Common Stock.
In 2022, the Company held its twelfth annual stockholder advisory vote on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, earning approximately 97% support. The Committee considered this strong support by stockholders as well as many other factors in evaluating the Company’s executive compensation programs. These factors include the alignment of our compensation programs with our corporate business objectives, evaluations of our programs by external consultants, and review of data from a select group of peers. Based on these considerations, the Committee did not make any changes to our executive compensation program, policies or pay levels as a result of the 2022 say on pay advisory vote. The Committee and Company value feedback from our stockholders, and we will continue to consider this feedback when evaluating decisions regarding our executive compensation programs in the future.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing and approving compensation levels and incentive plans for the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee has determined and reviewed the value and forms of compensation for Named Executive Officers and other officers based on Committee members’ knowledge and experience, competitive market compensation information, periodic review and analysis from an independent compensation consultant, and management recommendations. The Committee approves salary levels, incentive plan performance metrics, performance goals, payout
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 31
opportunities, equity award levels and terms, and the peer group used for market benchmarking. The Committee also evaluates the need for, and the provisions of, severance arrangements for the Named Executive Officers; reviews risks associated with compensation plans; and administers the Company’s clawback policy.
The Compensation Committee directly engages Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC as its independent executive compensation consultant. Meridian provided ongoing consulting assistance to the Compensation Committee throughout the year on areas such as compensation design, proxy disclosure, market trends, technical considerations and other matters. In particular, Meridian assisted the Committee by evaluating the Company’s compensation programs and award levels, participated in Committee meetings when requested, and reviewed Committee materials.
Other than executive and director compensation consulting to the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, Meridian does not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee has the final authority to hire and terminate the independent compensation consultant and evaluates the consultant periodically. The Chair of the Compensation Committee approves the fees paid to the consultant. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Meridian under SEC rules and concluded that Meridian’s work for the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.
The Company has retained Mercer LLC to provide additional consulting services at the request of management and to assist with management’s recommendations for selecting our peer group and executive compensation. Mercer assists management with market analysis, plan design, proxy disclosure review and review of corporate governance practices. The Company has assessed the independence of Mercer under SEC rules and concluded that Mercer’s work for management does not raise any conflict of interest. At the Company’s request, Mercer conducted a compensation review for Named Executive Officers in July 2021. This study helped inform compensation decisions for 2022.
The Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, and Chief Human Resources Officer are routinely invited to attend Committee meetings to provide analysis and recommendations on compensation issues and other matters the Committee is considering. At certain meetings, Ms. McReynolds presents pay recommendations for her direct reports. Ms. McReynolds does not make recommendations regarding her own compensation. No executive participates in discussions concerning his or her own pay or attends Committee executive sessions, except to the extent requested by the Committee.
Management formulates its recommendations with assistance from Mercer. The Committee considers management recommendations and discusses proposals with Meridian before making decisions on compensation awarded to the executives. The Committee believes these discussions provide valuable insight, but the Committee is solely responsible for approving all pay decisions for the Named Executive Officers.
The Compensation Committee delegates to management the implementation and record-keeping functions related to the various elements of compensation it has approved, to the extent permissible. The Committee may not and does not delegate its authority to review and determine the form or value of compensation for Named Executive Officers.
Total direct compensation for the Named Executive Officers is divided into two general categories: short-term cash compensation and long-term incentive compensation.
Although the Committee also reviews retirement, perquisites, and other benefits such as the 401(k) plan and health and welfare benefits, these benefits are not referenced against market data or used in determining direct compensation levels. For more information, see “Retirement and Other Benefits” and “Perquisites” in this CD&A.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 32
The Committee compares the Company’s compensation levels with the compensation of executives at similar entities in our industry to determine whether our compensation is competitive. The peer group is also used to gauge the Company’s performance for relative TSR in the C-LTIP.
The peer group includes the companies with which we compete in the transportation and logistics industry and for executive talent. Each year, with input from Meridian, the Committee reviews our current peer group using criteria such as market capitalization and revenues. Management also makes recommendations for our peer group, with input from Mercer.
Our peer group for market compensation benchmarking for 2022 is listed in the table below. Our peer group is identical to our prior peer group from 2021 other than the removal of Echo Global Logistics, Inc. (which underwent a go-private transaction) and the addition of TFI International Inc. following its acquisition of UPS Freight in April 2021.
Company Name |
Revenue in 2022 ($ millions) |
ArcBest Corporation |
5,324 |
Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. |
1,217 |
Forward Air Corporation |
1,973 |
Hub Group, Inc. |
5,340 |
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. |
14,814 |
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. |
7,429 |
Landstar System, Inc. |
7,437 |
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
6,260 |
Saia, Inc. |
2,792 |
Schneider National, Inc. |
6,604 |
TFI International Inc. |
8,813 |
US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. |
2,161 |
Werner Enterprises, Inc. |
3,290 |
Yellow Corporation (f/k/a YRC Worldwide Inc.) |
5,245 |
Target total compensation and each pay component are designed to approximate the 50th percentile of the peer group, with actual pay outcomes that vary based on company performance. Although the Committee considers these market benchmarks, compensation for a given executive may further vary from market based on the executive’s experience, the scope and complexity of the executive’s position, the executive’s current objectives and responsibilities, internal equity, the executive’s performance, and retention needs.
In setting performance goals for the incentive plans, the Committee references the historical long-term ROCE of the S&P 500 companies. We believe the S&P 500 is an appropriate performance benchmark because it is a broad-based group of U.S. companies in leading industries and reflects the risk and return characteristics of the broader market on an ongoing basis. While the S&P 500 primarily includes companies that are larger than the Company, the performance of these companies reflects stable, well-managed organizations. The Committee believes that performance at or above the level of the S&P 500 companies is acceptable performance and worthy of performance-based incentive payments. In addition, for long-term incentives, the Company uses TSR relative to our industry peer group to more directly align the long-term cash incentive plan with shareholder value creation.
Base salary is a fixed component of compensation paid for performing specific job duties and functions. Base salary is an important component of compensation and is crucial to our ability to attract and retain key talent. The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries for Named Executive Officers annually, considering the following:
the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, including consideration of the executive’s experience, the scope and complexity of the executive’s position, the executive’s current objectives and responsibilities, internal equity, the executive’s performance, and retention needs;
market analysis;
input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant;
economic and inflationary factors;
the Company’s recent and historical financial performance;
the Company’s strategic plans;
the Company’s resources; and
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations (regarding executives other than herself).
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 33
The Committee does not assign a specific weighting to any of these factors. In considering any increase in base salary, the Committee takes into account the effect such an increase would have on the Named Executive Officer’s potential annual incentive, because compensation under those awards is calculated based on a percentage of the individual’s base salary.
Based on the Committee’s annual review and the strong performance of the Named Executive Officer team, the Committee increased base salary levels to generally reflect the 50th percentile of the peer group effective January 1, 2022. The following chart sets forth the base salaries for each Named Executive Officer for 2021 and 2022.
|
Base Salary at December 31, 2021 |
Base Salary at December 31, 2022 |
||
Judy R. McReynolds |
|
$ 824,000 |
|
$ 848,720 |
David R. Cobb |
|
475,000 |
|
489,250 |
Michael E. Newcity |
|
403,297 |
|
415,396 |
Seth Runser(1) |
|
382,133 |
|
437,750 |
Daniel E. Loe |
|
401,700 |
|
413,751 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
|
401,700 |
|
413,751 |
(1)
Mr. Runser became ABF Freight President in July 2021. His salary in 2021 is reflective of a mid-year role change. |
The annual cash incentive for 2022 was based on the Company’s ROCE (adjusted) and operating income (adjusted). As in prior years, the two performance metrics were equally weighted.
Operating income (adjusted) is generally determined based on the operating income shown by the Company’s consolidated financial statements, adjusted for nonrecurring or unusual items and other items set forth in the ArcBest Corporation Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Plan. The use of operating income reinforces the Company’s emphasis on profitable growth.
ROCE (adjusted) is generally calculated by dividing net income by average adjusted debt plus average equity for the applicable period (with net income, debt and equity adjusted for nonrecurring or unusual items and other items set forth in the ArcBest Corporation Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Plan). As discussed earlier, our ROCE goal is based on the historical average ROCE of the S&P 500 companies over longer periods of time. The Committee and management believe that ROCE keeps participants focused on the profitable use of Company resources, which increases the value of the Company to its stockholders. We use a historical average ROCE of the S&P 500, typically over a period of at least ten years, so the performance target does not reflect short-term market volatility.
Each Named Executive Officer’s target annual incentive opportunity is expressed as a percentage of base salary. The following table shows the incentive targets for 2022.
|
Annual Target Incentive (% of Base Salary) |
Judy R. McReynolds |
100% |
David R. Cobb |
75% |
Michael E. Newcity |
65% |
Seth Runser |
70% |
Daniel E. Loe |
65% |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
65% |
The annual incentive opportunities (as a percentage of base salary) for the named executive officers were unchanged from 2021. The maximum total payout potential is 250% of the target incentive, assuming Company performance is at or above the maximum goal levels for operating income and ROCE.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 34
The following tables show the goals and associated payouts for the two performance metrics utilized for the 2022 annual incentive.
Actual operating income achieved for 2022 as measured under the annual plan was $514.4 million, greater than the maximum performance amount, resulting in a payout of 200% for the operating income portion of the annual incentive. ROCE for the year was 39.9%, greater than the maximum performance amount, resulting in a payout of 300% for the ROCE portion of the annual incentive. Combining the two payouts, weighted 50% each, produced a maximum total payout of 250% of the target incentive opportunity. Actual payouts for 2022 performance are shown below:
|
2022 Target Annual Incentive Opportunity |
2022 Actual Annual Incentive Plan Payout |
||
Judy R. McReynolds |
|
$ 848,720 |
|
$ 2,121,800 |
David R. Cobb |
|
366,938 |
|
917,344 |
Michael E. Newcity |
|
270,007 |
|
675,018 |
Seth Runser |
|
306,425 |
|
766,062 |
Daniel E. Loe |
|
268,938 |
|
672,345 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
|
268,938 |
|
672,345 |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 35
Our long-term compensation target incentive opportunity consists of two components: (i) a three-year cash incentive opportunity (“C-LTIP”), and (ii) a time-vested RSU award. The following table shows the targets for long-term incentive compensation opportunities awarded in 2022 for the 2022-2024 C-LTIP and the 2022 RSU award.
|
Total Long-Term Compensation Target Incentive Opportunity (Fixed Dollar Amount) |
2022-2024 C-LTIP Target Value |
2022 RSU Grant Value |
Judy R. McReynolds |
$ 2,500,000 |
$ 1,250,000 |
$ 1,250,000 |
David R. Cobb |
800,000 |
400,000 |
400,000 |
Michael E. Newcity |
540,000 |
270,000 |
270,000 |
Seth Runser |
650,000 |
325,000 |
325,000 |
Daniel E. Loe |
550,000 |
275,000 |
275,000 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
550,000 |
275,000 |
275,000 |
The value of the long-term target incentive opportunity established for each Named Executive Officer was based, in large part, on the respective officers’ positions within the Company. Because half of the target award is delivered in the form of RSUs, the Committee also considers the number of shares available for grant, the number of previously granted awards currently outstanding, the burn rate, and potential shareholder dilution.
The Committee has awarded long-term cash incentive opportunities since 2006. We have observed that these awards, which are exclusively performance-based, appropriately reward management and drive performance with respect to the Company’s key financial metrics. The three-year performance cycle encourages a long-term perspective, while the payout being driven by relative TSR and three-year average ROCE (adjusted) incentivizes sustainable value creation relative to our peers along with profitability and capital efficiency. Using cash-based awards also mitigates the dilutive effect of solely offering long-term equity compensation. In February 2022, the Committee granted a three-year cash incentive award for the performance period from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024, using the same two metrics we have used in recent years: three-year average ROCE (adjusted) and relative TSR, each weighted 50%.
Relative TSR rewards participants when the Company outperforms our peer group and directly aligns executives’ interests with shareholder value creation relative to our peers. The payout for the relative TSR component is based on the percentile rank of the Compounded Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”) of our TSR relative to our peer group over the three-year measurement period. For these purposes, we calculate TSR as the annualized rate of return reflecting price appreciation between the beginning 60-day average share price (ending December 31 of the year immediately prior to the beginning of the measurement period) and the ending 60-day average share price (ending December 31 of the final year of the measurement period), adjusted for dividends paid and the compounding effect of reinvested dividends. CAGR converts the total return into a value that indicates what the return was on an annual basis for the three-year period. For information on the performance peer group for the relative TSR component of the 2022-2024 cash long-term incentive plan, refer to page 33.
ROCE for the three-year performance period measures the efficient use of corporate assets to create profitable growth and aligns executives’ interest with our profitability and appropriate employment of capital.
For the ROCE component, the three-year average goal is based on historical averages for S&P 500 companies over longer periods of time, as discussed on page 34. ROCE is generally calculated by dividing net income by average adjusted debt plus average equity for the applicable period (with net income, debt and equity adjusted for nonrecurring or unusual items and other items set forth in the ArcBest Corporation Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Plan).
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 36
The tables below show the goals and associated payouts for the two performance metrics utilized for the 2022-2024 C-LTIP. Payments for the 2022-2024 C-LTIP, if any, will be made in early 2025. The maximum total payout potential is 250% of the target incentive, assuming Company performance is at or above the maximum goal levels for operating income and ROCE.
Relative TSR |
Payout Earned for Relative TSR (% of target earned)* |
< 25th percentile |
0% |
25th percentile (threshold) |
25% |
50th percentile |
100% |
≥75th percentile |
200% |
ROCE % Achieved |
Payout Earned for ROCE (% of target earned)* |
<8% |
0% |
8% (threshold) |
50% |
13% |
100% |
≥18% |
300% |
The payout earned for performance at levels between those indicated is calculated using straight-line interpolation, except there is no payout for performance below the threshold level.
The Company grants RSU awards to help align the executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. In 2022, Named Executive Officers were granted time-vested RSUs as shown in the table below.
Named Executive Officer |
RSU Target Grant Value |
RSUs Granted in 2022* |
Judy R. McReynolds |
$ 1,250,000 |
15,700 |
David R. Cobb |
400,000 |
5,000 |
Michael E. Newcity |
270,000 |
3,400 |
Seth Runser |
325,000 |
4,100 |
Daniel E. Loe |
275,000 |
3,400 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
275,000 |
3,400 |
*
The number of RSUs granted is based on the target award value established by the Committee divided by the closing stock price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant and rounded to the nearest 100 units. |
The Committee believes the award of RSUs with time-based vesting makes it easier for the Named Executive Officers to accumulate an equity interest in the Company and comply with our Stock Ownership Policy and also helps to retain key talent. RSUs granted in 2022 are subject to three-year ratable vesting, with one-third of the awards vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. Stock will be issued in settlement of the RSUs on the vesting dates, or earlier if the Named Executive Officer experiences a qualifying termination of employment. No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid to Named Executive Officers on RSUs. See “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End” for additional information regarding these awards.
The performance period for the 2020-2022 C-LTIP ended on December 31, 2022. The Company’s actual TSR percentile rank was 100th and three-year average ROCE (adjusted) was 26.7%, both above the maximum performance levels, resulting in an aggregate payout of 250% of the target incentive opportunity, as reflected in the table below. The individual incentive targets were calculated using base salary during the performance period. The original performance payout tables for the 2020-2022 awards can be found in our proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
2020-2022 Target C-LTIP Opportunity |
2020-2022 Actual C-LTIP Payout |
Judy R. McReynolds |
$ 860,000 |
$ 2,150,000 |
David R. Cobb |
325,000 |
812,500 |
Michael E. Newcity |
265,000 |
662,500 |
Seth Runser(1) |
170,000 |
425,000 |
Daniel E. Loe |
210,000 |
525,000 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
210,000 |
525,000 |
Mr. Runser’s target C-LTIP opportunity for the 2020-2022 performance period is based on his role as Vice President — Linehaul Operations at the time of the award.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 37
Management has evaluated our compensation policies and practices, including our incentive plans, to determine whether any create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The primary responsibility for this evaluation is assigned to the Company’s Risk Management Committee, which is made up of several members of senior management. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Management’s evaluation, including the conclusions reached by the Risk Management Committee, was discussed with the Compensation Committee.
The information used by management and the Risk Management Committee and provided to the Compensation Committee included a framework of potential risk factors for certain compensation plans and identified how the Company’s existing processes and compensation programs mitigate those risks. Mitigating factors for potential risks included:
a combination of short- and long-term compensation;
a combination of equity- and cash-based compensation;
multiple performance metrics;
relative performance metrics;
robust financial control policies and audit practices;
caps for potential amounts earned under annual and long-term incentive plans;
a robust clawback policy;
a prohibition against hedging transactions or pledging of shares;
multi-year vesting periods for equity awards;
stock ownership requirements for executive officers;
retention of an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee;
approval of performance criteria and performance results by the Compensation Committee, which consists of only independent Directors; and
review of peer groups by an independent compensation consultant and the Compensation Committee.
The most recent risk management evaluation was provided to the Compensation Committee in December 2022. Based on the information provided and the Compensation Committee’s knowledge of the Company’s compensation policies and practices, the Compensation Committee agreed with management’s conclusion that the risks arising from our compensation plans and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Committee believes the Named Executive Officers should maintain meaningful equity holdings in the Company to align their interests with those of the Company’s other stockholders. The Board adopted a Stock Ownership Policy for Named Executive Officers that requires them to own stock with a value equal to or greater than an established multiple of their base salary, as shown in the table below.
Position Title |
Stock Ownership Multiple |
ArcBest Chairman, President and CEO |
5 x base salary |
Other Named Executive Officers |
3 x base salary |
Participants are prohibited from selling any Company stock (except to pay the taxes generated by an equity grant vesting) until the ownership requirement is attained. Stock owned in a Company-sponsored retirement plan, RSUs, and stock owned outright all count toward the ownership requirement. The Committee reviews ownership levels annually. As of the most recent review in April 2022, all Named Executive Officers have met or exceeded their ownership multiple requirement.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee administers the Stock Ownership Policy and considers changes related to employees as recommended by the Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate this policy at any time or waive the restrictions for any individual in its sole discretion.
Pursuant to the Ownership Incentive Plan, any shares issued in the future upon exercise of a stock option or stock appreciation right (should any be granted under the plan) may not be sold before the earlier of (i) twelve months following the date of exercise and (ii) the date of termination of the applicable employee’s employment.
The Company’s policy for granting equity awards states:
the Compensation Committee is responsible for granting equity-based compensation for employees;
the Compensation Committee establishes a fixed dollar value for each grant recipient;
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 38
the award dates for each grant are five business days following the Company’s applicable quarterly earnings release, unless a different date is approved by the Board;
the number of shares/units awarded will be based on the fixed dollar value established by the Compensation Committee divided by the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the specified award date and rounded to the nearest 100 shares, unless otherwise approved by the Board; and
any award that does not conform to these policy requirements must be approved by the Board.
The Committee has implemented a policy for the “clawback” of any bonus or incentive compensation awarded to any executive officer, including a Named Executive Officer, under certain circumstances. Under the terms of the policy, the Committee may require reimbursement of any cash, equity or equity-based award or payment made under any incentive plan to an executive officer in the event of:
a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, regardless of the existence of misconduct or fault;
an overpayment as the result of an error, including errors in determination of performance metric results or in the calculation of an officer’s covered compensation; or
an Act of Misconduct (as such term is defined in the clawback policy) by the officer.
All Company officers, including Named Executive Officers, and certain other employees, as well as non-employee Directors, are subject to the Insider Trading Policy, which prohibits certain transactions in the Company’s securities, including the purchase or sale of puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities. The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits monetization transactions, such as forward sale contracts (in which a stockholder continues to own the underlying security without having all the risks or rewards of ownership, executes a short-sale of Company securities, or “sells against the box”—failing to deliver sold securities), as well as any other hedging or pledging transaction involving the Company’s securities. This policy does not include ArcBest stock options exercised in accordance with the terms of the Company’s equity plan. The Company does not have any outstanding stock option awards.
The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in retirement and benefit programs as described below. The Committee believes the benefits provided by these programs continue to be important factors in attracting and retaining the overall officer group, including the Named Executive Officers.
Prior to 2009, the Company provided Named Executive Officers with the predominant portion of their long-term compensation through post-employment payments under the Supplemental Benefit Plan (the “SBP”) and Deferred Salary Agreements (“DSA”) described on page 48. All benefits under these plans have been frozen, and officers now receive a significant portion of their long-term compensation through the long-term incentive cash and equity compensation previously described. Ms. McReynolds is the only Named Executive Officer with a frozen SBP or DSA benefit. The other Named Executive Officers were promoted or hired after the freeze and therefore are not participants in those plans.
Following are the various benefit programs in which the Named Executive Officers have either active or frozen participation.
The Company maintains the ArcBest 401(k) and DC Retirement Plan for eligible non-contractual employees. The Named Executive Officers can participate in this plan on the same basis as all other eligible employees. The Company matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s eligible earnings subject to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) annual compensation limit.
The Company also makes Discretionary Defined Contributions under the 401(k) and DC Retirement Plan, which are determined annually based on the Company’s operating results. The amount of the Discretionary Defined Contribution is based on a percentage of annual eligible compensation (as defined under the plan).
The Company provides medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability benefits to all eligible non-contractual employees. The Named Executive Officers can participate in these benefit plans on the same basis as all other eligible non-contractual employees.
Corporate officers and certain other subsidiary officers, including the Named Executive Officers, are provided with life insurance coverage of $1 million in the event they suffer accidental death while traveling on Company business.
Corporate officers and certain other subsidiary officers, including the Named Executive Officers, and their eligible dependents have lifetime health coverage under the Company’s Executive Medical Policy following their termination of employment after age 55 with 10 years of service. The health coverage is provided through a fully insured third party-provided health plan. Eligible retired officers from age 55 to 60 pay a premium to the Company, equivalent to the then-current COBRA rate applicable to qualifying former employees. From age 60 to 65, a retired officer is required to reimburse the Company an amount equivalent to $250 per
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 39
individual covered per month, up to a maximum of $500 per month. For retired officers age 65 and over, reduced premiums are charged by the Company for continued retiree coverage. Participation in this plan was frozen in 2017. All of our current Named Executive Officers are eligible participants.
The Executive Medical Policy provides that coverage will be forfeited if the officer becomes an employee, consultant or director of, or has an ownership interest in, any competitor of the Company.
Prior to 2010, the Company maintained a noncontributory, unfunded supplemental pension benefit plan (“SBP”) that supplemented benefits under the Company’s legacy Pension Plan. Under the SBP, the Company paid sums in addition to amounts payable under the Pension Plan to eligible officers, including eligible Named Executive Officers. The SBP has been frozen since December 31, 2009. Ms. McReynolds has a frozen benefit under the SBP. See “2022 Pension Benefits” for more information.
The Company has unfunded, noncontributory DSAs with certain of their officers. No Named Executive Officers are active participants in a DSA, but Ms. McReynolds has a frozen benefit under a DSA. See “2022 Pension Benefits” for more information.
Perquisites provided by the Company are generally limited to situations where there is some related business benefit to the Company, such as personal travel cost associated with spousal attendance at Company or industry events. See the “Summary Compensation Table” for a listing of the reportable perquisites for the Named Executive Officers.
None of our Named Executive Officers is party to an employment agreement with the Company. However, the Named Executive Officers do participate in the Amended and Restated 2012 Change in Control Plan (the “2012 Change in Control Plan”) for certain senior officers of the Company. The Board amended and restated the plan in October 2022 to, among other things, clarify the treatment of outstanding equity awards upon a change in control. The Committee believes this plan serves the best interests of our stockholders since it is designed to help retain executives during uncertain times leading up to and immediately following a change in control. By providing fair compensation in the event of termination following a change in control, the plan is designed to allow the executives to reasonably evaluate potential actions without concern over how it may impact them financially.
The benefits under the 2012 Change in Control Plan are intended to provide the officer participants with a reasonable severance package that is based on the value the officers have created and is realized by the Company’s stockholders in the event of a change in control. The Company does not gross up for taxes a Named Executive Officer may owe on change in control benefits, including any excise taxes under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4999. Under the terms of the 2012 Change in Control Plan, a best-net calculation will be performed to determine whether change in control benefits due to the Named Executive Officers should be reduced (so no excise tax will be imposed) or should be paid in full (with any resulting excise taxes to be paid in full by the Named Executive Officer). See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” for additional information regarding the provisions of the 2012 Change in Control Plan.
Section 162(m) of the IRC limits the tax deductibility of annual compensation paid to certain executives to $1 million. As a result, the Company will not receive a federal income tax deduction for any compensation paid to its Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million except to the extent awards are “grandfathered” under applicable exceptions. The Committee believes that stockholder interests are best served by not restricting its flexibility in structuring compensation programs, even if those programs result in non-deductible compensation expenses.
IRC Section 280G applies to payments made to executives of a company in connection with a change in control and prohibits the deduction of any “excess parachute payment.” Benefits payable under the 2012 Change in Control Plan, as well as accelerated vesting of equity awards and annual and long-term cash incentives, could result in “excess parachute payments” that are not deductible by the Company. For more information regarding amounts payable and benefits available upon the occurrence of certain changes in control, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
The Company designs and operates its nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements in a manner that is intended to be exempt or compliant with Section 409A of the IRC and the final regulations issued thereunder.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 40
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management, and based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that it be included in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report and the Company’s 2023 Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
Committee Members |
||
Kathleen D. McElligott, Chair Salvatore A. Abbate Eduardo F. Conrado Craig E. Philip |
None of the Compensation Committee members is an officer or employee or former officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of directors of any other entity, or the compensation committee of any other entity, that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee. Ms. McElligott, Messrs. Gorman and Conrado, and Dr. Philip served on the Compensation Committee in 2022.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 41
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth compensation paid for the years indicated for our 2022 Named Executive Officers.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) |
Change in Pension Value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(3) |
All Other Compensation ($)(4) |
Total ($) |
||||||
Judy R. McReynolds ArcBest Chairman, |
2022 |
$ |
848,720 |
$ |
1,230,566 |
$ |
4,271,800 |
$ |
16,127 |
$ |
63,680 |
$ |
6,430,893 |
2021 |
|
824,000 |
|
990,774 |
|
4,132,412 |
|
10,485 |
|
48,618 |
|
6,006,289 |
|
2020 |
|
800,000 |
|
806,238 |
|
2,520,480 |
|
27,653 |
|
20,237 |
|
4,174,608 |
|
David R. Cobb ArcBest CFO |
2022 |
|
489,250 |
|
391,900 |
|
1,729,844 |
|
- |
|
24,580 |
|
2,635,574 |
2021 |
|
475,000 |
|
399,786 |
|
1,719,079 |
|
- |
|
23,380 |
|
2,617,245 |
|
2020 |
|
430,500 |
|
304,960 |
|
960,477 |
|
- |
|
20,130 |
|
1,716,067 |
|
Michael E. Newcity ArcBest Senior Vice President-CIO and ArcBest Technologies President |
2022 |
|
415,396 |
|
266,492 |
|
1,337,518 |
|
- |
|
24,580 |
|
2,043,986 |
2021 |
|
403,297 |
|
269,421 |
|
1,317,286 |
|
- |
|
23,380 |
|
2,013,384 |
|
2020 |
|
391,550 |
|
253,498 |
|
808,672 |
|
- |
|
20,130 |
|
1,473,850 |
|
Seth Runser ABF Freight |
2022 |
|
437,750 |
|
321,358 |
|
1,191,062 |
|
- |
|
29,648 |
|
1,979,818 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Daniel E. Loe ArcBest Chief Yield Officer |
2022 |
|
413,751 |
|
266,492 |
|
1,197,345 |
|
- |
|
41,737 |
|
1,919,325 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Dennis L. Anderson II ArcBest Chief Strategy Officer |
2022 |
|
413,751 |
|
266,492 |
|
1,197,345 |
|
- |
|
29,763 |
|
1,907,351 |
2021 |
|
401,700 |
|
269,421 |
|
1,228,424 |
|
- |
|
29,074 |
|
1,928,619 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
(1)
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards granted to the Named Executive Officers on May 6, 2022, under the Ownership Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, determined without regard to estimated forfeitures and adjusted for present value of dividends (to reflect that dividend equivalents are not paid with respect to RSU awards). The actual value realized by the officer as a result of these awards will vary based on a number of factors, including the Company’s performance, stock price fluctuations and applicable vesting. No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid to Named Executive Officers on RSUs. See Note L to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report for additional detail regarding share-based compensation. (2)
Reflects cash compensation earned during 2022 from the annual incentive plan (“AIP”), and cash compensation earned from the 2020-2022 cash long-term incentive plan (“C-LTIP”), each of which were paid in February 2023. See the “2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table and the CD&A for additional information on the 2022 AIP and the C-LTIP. |
|
McReynolds |
Cobb |
Newcity |
Runser |
Loe |
Anderson |
||||||
Annual Incentive Plan |
$ |
2,121,800 |
$ |
917,344 |
$ |
675,018 |
$ |
766,062 |
$ |
672,345 |
$ |
672,345 |
C-LTIP |
|
2,150,000 |
|
812,500 |
|
662,500 |
|
425,000 |
|
525,000 |
|
525,000 |
Total |
$ |
4,271,800 |
$ |
1,729,844 |
$ |
1,337,518 |
$ |
1,191,062 |
$ |
1,197,345 |
$ |
1,197,345 |
(3)
Reflects the increase in actuarial present value during 2022 of each Named Executive Officer’s accumulated benefit under the Company’s legacy SBP and DSAs. The values reported are determined using the same assumptions as used by the Company for financial reporting purposes for the Company’s SBP and DSAs, except the payment date is assumed to be age 60 for the SBP rather than age 65. See “2022 Pension Benefits” for additional information on these plans. The 2022 change in actuarial present value by plan is as follows: |
|
McReynolds |
Cobb |
Newcity |
Runser |
Loe |
Anderson |
||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan |
$ |
7,198 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Deferred Salary Agreement |
|
8,929 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Total Increase |
$ |
16,127 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Earnings with respect to outstanding vested RSUs are not above market and are not included in this column. See “2022 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” for additional information on outstanding vested RSUs. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 42
(4)
All Other Compensation for 2022 consists of the following: |
|
McReynolds |
Cobb |
Newcity |
Runser |
Loe |
Anderson |
||||||
401(k) Company Match |
$ |
9,150 |
$ |
9,150 |
$ |
9,150 |
$ |
9,150 |
$ |
9,150 |
$ |
9,150 |
DC Contribution |
|
15,250 |
|
15,250 |
|
15,250 |
|
15,250 |
|
15,250 |
|
15,250 |
24-Hour Accidental Death Premiums(i) |
|
180 |
|
180 |
|
180 |
|
- |
|
180 |
|
180 |
Perquisites(ii) |
|
34,085 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
11,423 |
|
- |
Gross-Ups(iii) |
|
5,015 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5,248 |
|
5,734 |
|
5,183 |
Total Other Compensation |
$ |
63,680 |
$ |
24,580 |
$ |
24,580 |
$ |
29,648 |
$ |
41,737 |
$ |
29,763 |
(i)
The 24-hour accidental death benefit was closed to new participants before Mr. Runser was promoted to an eligible role; therefore, he does not receive this benefit. (ii)
Perquisites values for Ms. McReynolds and Mr. Loe include expenses for spousal travel to Company or industry events and any related Company lost tax deduction resulting from the spouse accompanying the Named Executive Officer on a Company airplane. Ms. McReynolds’ perquisite value also includes limited personal use of Company aircraft and a Christmas gift from the Company. The Company also provides a Christmas gift to each of the other Board members. No other Named Executive Officer received perquisites in excess of $10,000 during 2022, and therefore no value is reported. (iii)
Tax gross-ups for Ms. McReynolds and Messrs. Runser, Loe and Anderson are for gifts related to the Company’s annual President’s Club event and spousal travel on a Company airplane to a Company or industry event. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 43
The following table provides information related to non-equity and equity-based awards made to the Named Executive Officers for 2022:
Name |
Award Type(1) |
Approval Date(2,3,4) |
Grant Date |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2,3) |
All Other Stock Awards |
|||||||
|
Threshold ($) |
|
Target ($) |
|
Maximum ($) |
Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(4) |
|||||
Judy R. McReynolds |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
$ |
318,270 |
$ |
848,720 |
$ |
2,121,800 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
468,750 |
|
1,250,000 |
|
3,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,700 |
$ |
1,230,566 |
|
David R. Cobb |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
137,602 |
|
366,938 |
|
917,344 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
150,000 |
|
400,000 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
391,900 |
|
Michael E. Newcity |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
101,253 |
|
270,007 |
|
675,018 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
101,250 |
|
270,000 |
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
266,492 |
|
Seth Runser |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
114,909 |
|
306,425 |
|
766,063 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
121,875 |
|
325,000 |
|
812,500 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
321,358 |
|
Daniel E. Loe |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
100,852 |
|
268,938 |
|
672,345 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
103,125 |
|
275,000 |
|
687,500 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
266,492 |
|
Dennis L. Anderson II |
AIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
100,852 |
|
268,938 |
|
672,345 |
|
|
|
C-LTIP |
2/21/2022 |
2/21/2022 |
|
103,125 |
|
275,000 |
|
687,500 |
|
|
|
|
RSU |
4/26/2022 |
5/6/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
266,492 |
|
(1)
Award Types: AIP = annual incentive compensation plan RSU = restricted stock units granted under the Ownership Incentive Plan C-LTIP = three-year cash long-term incentive compensation plan (2022-2024 performance period) (2)
The performance criteria for the 2022 AIP award were approved by the Committee on February 21, 2022. Amounts shown in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column with respect to the 2022 AIP award represent the threshold, target and maximum payment levels of the 2022 AIP. The target amount reflected is calculated based on base salary earned in 2022. Awards under the annual incentive plan are described in greater detail in the narrative following this table and in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Components of Compensation — Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.” The actual amount of the AIP award paid for 2022 performance with respect to each Named Executive Officer is set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” (3)
The performance criteria for the 2022-2024 C-LTIP award were approved by the Committee on February 21, 2022. Amounts shown in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column represent the threshold, target and maximum payment levels with respect to C-LTIP awards granted in 2022. Awards under the cash long-term incentive compensation plan are described in greater detail in the narrative following this table and in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Components of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” (4)
The RSU award was approved by the Committee on April 26, 2022. As provided in the equity award policy, the grant date for the award was five business days following the first quarter’s earnings release. Value shown reflects the grant date fair value ($78.38 per share) of RSU awards made under the Ownership Incentive Plan on May 6, 2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, determined without regard to forfeitures and adjusted for present value of dividends (which are not payable with respect to RSUs granted to Named Executive Officers). |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 44
Annual incentive compensation plan (“AIP”) awards earned are generally paid as soon as administratively practicable following the date the awards are calculated and approved, but no later than March 15 of the year following the year to which the performance goals relate. Participants generally must be employed on the payment date in order to receive payment of their earned AIP awards. However, if a participant terminates during the plan year due to early retirement (age 55 with 10 years of service), normal retirement (age 65), death or disability, such participant remains eligible to receive a prorated AIP award, provided, in the case of early or normal retirement, the individual has been a participant for at least 90 days during the plan year. Upon any other termination, a participant’s award will be forfeited, unless the Committee, in its discretion, decides that a prorated award should be paid. Payment of a prorated incentive, if any, is made at the end of the measurement period and based upon actual performance results. The Amended and Restated 2012 Change in Control Plan provides for immediate payment of an earned award upon a qualified termination following a change in control, except where payment must be delayed six months for certain key employees as required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). Target incentive levels and information on performance goals are set forth in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Components of Compensation — Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.” Additional information regarding the treatment of these awards upon termination or a change in control is provided in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Generally, participants in the cash long-term incentive compensation plan (“C-LTIP”) must remain employed through the end of the measurement period in order to receive payment of any earned award. However, if a participant has at least 12 months of employment during a measurement period, such participant is eligible for a prorated benefit upon early retirement (age 55 with 10 years of service), normal retirement (age 65), death or disability, with payment determined based on target value, and payment, if any, is made at the end of the measurement period based upon actual performance results. Additional detail regarding the 2022 awards granted under the C-LTIP can be found in “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Components of Compensation — Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”
RSUs awarded in 2022 were granted under the Company’s Ownership Incentive Plan on May 6, 2022. The 2022 RSUs are subject to three-year ratable vesting, with one-third of the awards vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to early vesting if the participant experiences a qualifying termination from employment with the Company. Upon a participant’s normal retirement (age 65) or termination due to death or disability, the RSUs will fully vest. If termination of the participant occurs for good reason or without cause within 24 months of a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Amended and Restated 2012 Change in Control Plan), the participant’s outstanding RSUs awarded become fully vested and will be distributed as soon as administratively possible, except where payment must be delayed for six months for certain key employees as required by Section 409A of the IRC. No dividends are paid to Named Executive Officers on RSUs.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 45
The following table provides information related to any equity-based awards outstanding for the Named Executive Officers, as of December 31, 2022:
Stock Awards |
||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#)(1) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(2) |
|||||
Judy R. McReynolds |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
2,258 14,100 5,067 15,700 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
158,150 987,564 354,893 1,099,628 |
David R. Cobb |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
908 5,333 2,044 5,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,596 373,523 143,162 350,200 |
Michael E. Newcity |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
8,900 13,300 3,100 3,400 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
623,356 931,532 217,124 238,136 |
Seth Runser |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
2,800 8,400 3,700 4,100 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
196,112 588,336 259,148 287,164 |
Daniel E. Loe |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
7,100 10,300 3,100 3,400 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
497,284 721,412 217,124 238,136 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
05/09/2019(3) 05/12/2020(4) 05/11/2021(5) 05/06/2022(6) |
7,100 13,500 3,100 3,400 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
497,284 945,540 217,124 238,136 |
(1)
Ms. McReynolds and Mr. Cobb have attained early retirement eligibility in accordance with the terms of the RSU awards granted prior to 2022, resulting in pro rata vesting of such awards in an amount equal to (i) 1/48 of their RSU awards each month for awards in 2019 and 2020 (with full vesting on May 9, 2023, and May 12, 2024, respectively) and (ii) 1/36 of the total number of shares each month for awards granted in 2021 (with full vesting on May 11, 2024). (2)
Reflects the value of unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2022, awarded under the ArcBest Corporation Ownership Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, based on the closing market price of the Common Stock of $70.04 on December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of the year). (3)
These RSU awards fully vest on May 9, 2023, the fourth anniversary of their grant date. (4)
These RSU awards fully vest on May 12, 2024, the fourth anniversary of their grant date. (5)
These RSU awards fully vest on May 11, 2024, the third anniversary of their grant date. (6)
These RSU awards vest in three equal installments on May 6, 2023, May 6, 2024, and May 6, 2025. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 46
The following table provides information related to RSUs that vested during 2022 for the Named Executive Officers. None of our Named Executive Officers held stock option awards during 2022.
Name |
Stock Awards |
|
Number
of Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)(1,2) |
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)(3) |
|
Judy R. McReynolds |
28,040 |
2,235,937 |
David R. Cobb |
11,030 |
879,631 |
Michael E. Newcity |
16,900 |
1,328,894 |
Seth Runser |
5,700 |
446,562 |
Daniel E. Loe |
13,700 |
1,076,218 |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
13,500 |
1,061,358 |
(1)
The 2017 RSU awards fully vested and settled on May 12, 2022, and the 2018 RSU awards fully vested and settled on August 1, 2022. All of the shares issued for the 2017 RSU award and the 2018 RSU award at final vesting are free of vesting and ownership restrictions. All shares owned by executive officers are subject to company-imposed restrictions that limit trading during periods when officers have material nonpublic information as well as the Company’s policy related to minimum stock ownership for executive officers, as discussed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis. (2)
RSUs held by Ms. McReynolds and Mr. Cobb granted prior to 2022 were subject to pro rata vesting in 2022 because each of these executive officers had attained early retirement eligibility under the terms of the RSU awards. Awards that vest on a pro rata basis due to attainment of early retirement eligibility are not settled until the earlier of the original vesting date (four years from the grant date for awards in 2019 and 2020, and three years from the grant date for awards in 2021) or the date of a qualifying termination of employment. As such, while the value of all pro rata vesting in 2022 is reflected in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table above and detailed in the table below, Ms. McReynolds and Mr. Cobb have not yet received the shares that vested in 2022 based on qualification for early retirement under awards that did not fully vest in 2022. |
|
McReynolds Vested in 2022 |
Cobb Vested in 2022 |
2017 RSU Award (settled) |
1,980 |
860 |
2018 RSU Award (settled) |
2,377 |
890 |
2019 RSU Award |
6,775 |
2,725 |
2020 RSU Award |
10,575 |
4,000 |
2021 RSU Award |
6,333 |
2,555 |
Total vesting in 2022 |
28,040 |
11,030 |
(3)
Value realized on RSU vesting is equal to the closing market price of the Common Stock on the date of vesting multiplied by the number of shares that vest on that date. |
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2022, with respect to the Company’s compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:
Plan Category |
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans, Excluding Securities Reflected
in Column (a) |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
|
1,023,251(1) |
- |
1,377,519 |
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders |
|
- |
- |
- |
Total |
|
1,023,251 |
- |
1,377,519 |
(1)
This amount reflects outstanding RSU awards under the Amended and Restated ArcBest Corporation Ownership Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which provides for the award of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, RSUs and performance award units. The Plan does not permit reload options. Pursuant to the Second Amendment to the Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders on April 29, 2021, the aggregate number of shares that have been reserved for issuance pursuant to awards under the Plan is 4,874,500. No options have been granted under the Plan. The Committee administers the Plan. |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 47
The following table illustrates the present value of the accumulated benefit as of December 31, 2022, under the SBP and DSA for the Named Executive Officers.
Name |
Plan Name |
Number
of Years Credited Service (#) |
Present
Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(3) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year($) |
Judy R. McReynolds(1) |
Supplemental Benefit Plan (SBP) Deferred Salary Agreement (DSA) |
10.7 10.7 |
$ 424,470 157,739 |
$ - - |
David R. Cobb(2) |
|
- |
- |
- |
Michael E. Newcity(2) |
|
- |
- |
- |
Seth Runser(2) |
|
- |
- |
- |
Daniel E. Loe(2) |
|
- |
- |
- |
Dennis L. Anderson II(2) |
|
- |
- |
- |
(1)
Ms. McReynolds elected to cease participation in the SBP and DSA, and the benefits were frozen effective January 31, 2008. Number of Years of Credited Service for the SBP and DSA was frozen based on her service as of the January 31, 2008 freeze date. (2)
Messrs. Newcity, Runser, Loe and Anderson were promoted to eligible roles after the SBP and DSA were closed to new entrants. Mr. Cobb was hired after the SBP and DSA were closed to new entrants. As such, Messrs. Cobb, Newcity, Runser, Loe and Anderson are not eligible to participate in the SBP or DSA. (3)
The actuarial present value of the accumulated benefits disclosed above is determined using the same assumptions as used by the Company for financial reporting purposes except the payment date is assumed to be age 60 for the SBP rather than age 65. Such assumptions are discussed in Note J to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the 2022 Annual Report. The earliest date a benefit can be paid with no benefit reduction under the SBP is age 60. The payment date is assumed to be age 65 for the DSA, which is the earliest date a benefit can be paid with no benefit reduction. |
The SBP supplements benefits under the Company’s legacy non-contractual defined benefit pension plan (“Pension Plan”), which was terminated effective December 31, 2017, and fully liquidated as of December 31, 2019. The SBP was designed to replace benefit reductions (i) from various IRC limits and (ii) from reductions in the rate of benefit accruals from the Company’s 1985 pension formula. The SBP takes into account all eligible earnings under the Pension Plan without regard to IRC limitations. Participation in the SBP was generally limited to officers of the Company or ABF Freight, including certain Named Executive Officers. No new participants were permitted in the SBP after December 2005, and caps have been placed on the maximum benefits payable. Benefit accruals in the SBP were frozen for all remaining participants effective December 31, 2009.
Benefits under the SBP were calculated as an annuity and then converted to a lump sum. The Pension Plan benefit was then subtracted from the resulting lump sum to determine the SBP benefit.
The annuity formula for the ArcBest Supplemental Benefit Plan is:
1.0% x $400 x years of service + 2.0% x (FAP–$400) x years of service
Early retirement eligible participants (age 55 with 10 years of service) are subject to a benefit reduction of 6% per year for each year he or she retires prior to age 60.
Upon termination of employment, benefits are paid in a lump sum as soon as administratively feasible. Certain benefits must be delayed for six months for key employees as required by Section 409A of the IRC. Benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company.
The Company has unfunded, noncontributory DSAs with certain of their officers, including certain Named Executive Officers. No DSA has been entered into since December 2005, and the Company does not intend to enter into these agreements in the future. For the existing DSAs, upon normal retirement (age 65), death or disability as defined in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” the DSA benefit is equal to 35% of the participant’s final monthly base salary paid monthly for 120 months. Upon termination of employment prior to age 65, the monthly benefit is equal to the participant’s years of service (with a maximum of 25 years) times 3% times 35% of the participant’s final monthly base salary. Benefit payments commence in the month following termination, except to the extent a portion of the benefit must be delayed for six months for key employees as required by Section 409A of the IRC. DSA benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company.
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 48
The DSAs provide that in the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control,” followed by the officer’s termination within 36 months for pre-2005 deferred salary accruals or within 24 months for post-2004 deferred salary accruals, all benefits become 100% vested. The DSA benefit will be paid as a lump sum within fifteen days, with the 120 monthly installments discounted at 6.22% as provided in the DSA, except where payment must be delayed for six months for key employees as required by Section 409A of the IRC. DSA benefits will be reduced to the extent required to avoid being classified as excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the IRC. Other than during a 36-month period following a change in control of the Company for benefits accrued and vested prior to 2005 or during a 24-month period following a change in control of the Company for benefits accrued and vested after 2004, any unpaid DSA benefit is subject to forfeiture if the participant is discharged for wrongful conduct injurious to the Company, or if, following the date of termination, the participant discloses confidential information relating to the Company to unauthorized persons or becomes employed or renders services to a competitor of the Company.
The following table shows the Named Executive Officers’ deferred compensation activity during 2022 with respect to outstanding vested RSUs. The vesting and settlement terms applicable to RSUs are described previously in the “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Stock Awards under the Ownership Incentive Plan” section and in footnote (1) to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Year-End” table.
Name |
|
Executive Contributions in
Last Fiscal
Year ($)(1) |
|
Registrant Contributions in
Last Fiscal
Year ($) |
|
Aggregate Earnings
in Last
Fiscal Year ($)(2) |
|
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(3) |
|
Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal
Year End ($)(4,5) |
Judy R. McReynolds |
$ |
2,235,937 |
$ |
- |
$ |
(2,957,419) |
$ |
355,957 |
$ |
4,158,555 |
David R. Cobb |
|
879,631 |
|
- |
|
(1,156,289) |
|
142,093 |
|
1,625,909 |
Michael E. Newcity |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Seth Runser |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Daniel E. Loe |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Dennis L. Anderson II |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
(1)
The executive contribution amount represents the value realized on vesting of all RSUs that vested during 2022 due to early retirement eligibility, as previously reported in the “2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table. (2)
The earnings amount represents an estimate of annual earnings (or losses) with respect to vested but unsettled RSUs and is based on the difference in closing market price of the Common Stock of $119.85 as of December 31, 2021, and $70.04 as of December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of the year), multiplied by the number of vested RSUs as of December 31, 2022, described in footnote (4) below. (3)
The value in the Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions column represents the value of the 2017 RSU awards that fully vested and were settled on May 12, 2022 plus the value of the 2018 RSU awards that fully vested and were settled on August 1, 2022. The value for the 2017 RSU awards is based on the closing market price of Common Stock of $74.30 on the settlement date, and includes 1,980 RSUs for Ms. McReynolds and 860 RSUs for Mr. Cobb. The value for the 2018 RSU awards is based on the closing market price of Common Stock of $87.86 on the settlement date, and includes 2,377 RSUs for Ms. McReynolds and 890 RSUs for Mr. Cobb. (4)
Includes the value associated with 59,374 vested but unsettled RSUs for Ms. McReynolds and 23,214 vested but unsettled RSUs for Mr. Cobb. The value is based on the closing market price of the Common Stock of $70.04 on December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of the year). RSUs that vested during 2022 are reported in the “2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table. (5)
The aggregate grant date fair value with respect to RSUs in prior years (2019-2021), including those previously reported in the “Summary Compensation Table,” are set forth in the table below. To the extent those previously-awarded RSUs have become vested but remain unsettled, the value associated with those RSUs as of December 31, 2022 (calculated as described in footnote (4) above) is reported in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column above. The grant date fair value of RSUs awarded in 2022 is reported in the “Stock Awards” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” |
|
McReynolds |
|
Cobb |
2019 RSU Grant Date Fair Value |
748,773 |
301,167 |
|
2020 RSU Grant Date Fair Value |
806,238 |
304,960 |
|
2021 RSU Grant Date Fair Value |
990,774 |
399,786 |
|
Total |
$ 2,545,785 |
$ 1,005,913 |
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 49
The Company does not have any employment contracts or severance arrangements with any Named Executive Officer that provide for payments in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control, other than the applicable termination provisions contained within the various arrangements discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
The termination and change in control provisions existing as of December 31, 2022, are described below and quantified in the table on page 54. All payments are assumed to be made in accordance with the six-month delay for key employees as required by Section 409A of the IRC, where applicable.
Regardless of the manner in which a Named Executive Officer’s employment with the Company terminates, the officer is entitled to receive compensation and other benefits earned during the term of his or her employment, including the following:
Accrued vacation;
Amounts earned but not yet paid under the annual incentive plan (“AIP”) and cash long-term incentive compensation plan (“C-LTIP”) (see the “Summary Compensation Table” section for amounts earned in 2022);
DSA benefit earned as of the DSA freeze date, paid monthly over 120 months (see the “2022 Pension Benefits” table for present value as of December 31, 2022, and more information regarding DSAs); and
SBP benefit earned as of the SBP freeze date, distributed as a lump sum (see “2022 Pension Benefits” for values).
In the event a Named Executive Officer terminates and is eligible for early retirement, the officer will be entitled to the following, in addition to the items identified in “Potential Payments upon Termination.” Early retirement is generally defined as termination of employment after reaching at least age 55 with 10 years of service, but before age 65.
Vesting and settlement of a pro rata number of RSUs granted prior to 2022 based on the number of whole months elapsed since the award date if there has elapsed a minimum of 12 months since the award date (see “2022 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” table for values related to our early retirement-eligible Named Executive Officers); remaining unvested RSUs are forfeited, including unvested RSUs under the 2022 award, which are not subject to pro-rata vesting;
Executive medical coverage, with the retired officer responsible for paying a monthly premium amount equal to the then-current COBRA rate until age 60. All retirees are responsible for paying a premium equivalent to $250 per individual covered, up to a maximum of $500, from age 60 to 65, and a reduced monthly premium after age 65; and
A pro rata benefit under the C-LTIP and under the AIP based on the grant value for C-LTIP awards and actual performance results for the full performance period, if he or she has completed a minimum of (a) 12 months of the measurement period under the C-LTIP, and (b) 90 days of the measurement period under the AIP, respectively. Any pro rata payment earned will not be paid until the end of the measurement period for the plan. (See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for additional information on AIP awards and C-LTIP awards).
In the event of a Named Executive Officer’s termination due to his or her normal retirement, death or disability, the officer will be entitled to the following, in addition to the items identified in “Potential Payments upon Termination.” Under the Company’s plans, normal retirement is generally defined as termination of employment on or after attaining age 65, and disability is generally determined to have occurred if the participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.
Full vesting and settlement of all RSUs;
Executive medical coverage, with the retired officer (or his or her eligible dependents) responsible for paying a reduced monthly premium after age 65; and
A pro rata benefit under the C-LTIP and under the AIP based on the target value for C-LTIP awards and actual performance results for the full performance period, if he or she has completed a minimum of (a) 12 months of the measurement period under the C-LTIP, and (b) 90 days of the measurement period under the AIP, respectively. Any pro rata payment earned will not be paid until the end of the measurement period for the plan. (See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for additional information on AIP awards and C-LTIP awards).
/ 2023 PROXY STATEMENT 50
Subject to the terms of the Amended and Restated 2012 Change in Control Plan, as amended (the “Change in Control Plan”), in the event of a change in control of the Company, if termination of a Named Executive Officer occurs within 24 months of the change in control for “good reason” or without “cause” (as such terms are defined in the Change in Control Plan), the Named Executive Officer will be entitled to the following, in addition to the items identified in “Potential Payments upon Termination”:
RSUs become fully vested as of the termination date and will be distributed as soon as administratively possible;
For annual awards that have not yet reached the end of the measurement period, a prorated benefit under the AIP based on the number of whole months completed during the applicable measurement period through the termination date;
Under the DSA, if termination of the Named Executive Officer occurs within 36 months of the change in control for benefits accrued and vested prior to 2005 and within 24 months of the change in control for benefits accrued and vested after 2004, the officer becomes 100% vested in the DSA benefit and the benefit is distributed as a lump sum;
For C-LTIP awards that have not yet reached the end of the measurement period, a prorated benefit under the plan based on the number of whole months completed during the applicable measurement period through the termination date; amounts payable pursuant to such awards are computed and paid in the normal course of business and pursuant to the terms of the applicable plan after the end of the measurement period;